Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAtmosphere

Machine Learning-Based Hydrological Drought Prediction Integrating Teleconnections and Hydrological Memory in a Semi-Arid Basin, Algeria

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Civil Engineering, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan 24060, Türkiye
  2. 2Laboratory of Water & Environment, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, University Hassiba Benbouali of Chlef, B.P 78C, Ouled Fares, Chlef 02180, Algeria
  3. 3Department of Civil Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt 56100, Türkiye
  4. 4Department of Geography, Nakhchivan State University, AZ 7012 Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan
  5. 5Geography Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Igdir University, Igdir 76000, Türkiye
  6. 6G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Garhwal Regional Centre, Srinagar 246174, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

Hydrological drought forecasting in semi-arid basins is challenging due to the combined influence of meteorological forcing, large-scale atmospheric teleconnections, and basin memory processes, which are rarely jointly analysed within a leakage-free predictive framework. This study addresses this gap by evaluating gradient-boosted trees and neural forecasting models for one-month-ahead prediction of the Standardized Runoff Index (SRI) in two sub-basins of the Wadi Sahaouat Basin, Algeria. The models include gradient-boosted regression trees (GBRT), A-N-BEATS, A-N-HiTS, and TiDE, representing distinct forecasting architectures. Predictors consist of the Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI), seven teleconnection indices (NAO, AO, EAWR, SCAND, MEI, SOI, WeMO), and their one- to three-month lags. Two scenarios are tested: Scenario 1 uses SPI and teleconnection lags only, while Scenario 2 additionally includes lagged SRI values (SRI_lag1–3) to represent hydrological memory. A train-only Variance Inflation Factor (VIF > 10) procedure is applied to remove multicollinearity without data leakage. In Basin 1, SRI lags were excluded due to strong collinearity with SPI lags (r = 0.984), resulting in identical inputs for both scenarios. In Basin 2, SRI lags were retained to assess their predictive contribution. GBRT achieved the best overall performance across both basins and scenarios, with mean RMSE, NSE, and KGE values of 0.0682, 0.9907, and 0.8945, respectively. TiDE ranked second overall, with a mean RMSE of 0.1166, followed by A-N-HiTS in third place with a mean RMSE of 0.1203 and A-N-BEATS with the weakest overall performance, with a mean RMSE of 0.2159. These results indicate that gradient-boosted trees remain highly competitive with neural models for small monthly hydrological datasets and that the value of hydrological memory is basin-dependent and varies according to its independence from concurrent meteorological forcing.

Related

  1. Projection of hydrological droughts in the upper Hanjiang River under the climate change impact based on stacking machine learning model
    Xuerui Gao, Jingyuan Chen, Daning Liu +6
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  2. Estimation of hydrological drought using regional risk ranking and machine learning algorithms
    Pin-Chun Huang, Kwan Tun Lee, Naranchimeg Batsaikhan
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  3. GLORIF1, a global river flow dataset created by integrating process-based modelling and machine learning
    Sümeyye Büşra Işık, Oriol Pomarol Moya, Michele Magni +3
    Scientific DataPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsPMC
  4. A novel deep learning prediction method for PM2.5 integrating improved MSTL decomposition and FATA optimization algorithm
    Xiaoliang Zhao, Pinyuan Qiao, Bandna Bharti +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionStatisticsPLOS
  5. Machine-learning prediction of freezing temperature in Pb-contaminated soils remediated with biochar
    Laila Safi
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{katipoglu2026machine,
  title = {{Machine Learning-Based Hydrological Drought Prediction Integrating Teleconnections and Hydrological Memory in a Semi-Arid Basin, Algeria}},
  author = {Okan Mert Katipoğlu and Mohammed Achite and Veysi Kartal and Mehmet Ali Çelik and Kusum Pandey},
  journal = {Atmosphere},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.3390/atmos17070670},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17070670},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine Learning-Based Hydrological Drought Prediction Integrating Teleconnections and Hydrological Memory in a Semi-Arid Basin, Algeria
AU  - Okan Mert Katipoğlu
AU  - Mohammed Achite
AU  - Veysi Kartal
AU  - Mehmet Ali Çelik
AU  - Kusum Pandey
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/04
JO  - Atmosphere
DO  - 10.3390/atmos17070670
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17070670
AB  - Hydrological drought forecasting in semi-arid basins is challenging due to the combined influence of meteorological forcing, large-scale atmospheric teleconnections, and basin memory processes, which are rarely jointly analysed within a leakage-free predictive framework. This study addresses this gap by evaluating gradient-boosted trees and neural forecasting models for one-month-ahead prediction of the Standardized Runoff Index (SRI) in two sub-basins of the Wadi Sahaouat Basin, Algeria. The models include gradient-boosted regression trees (GBRT), A-N-BEATS, A-N-HiTS, and TiDE, representing distinct forecasting architectures. Predictors consist of the Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI), seven teleconnection indices (NAO, AO, EAWR, SCAND, MEI, SOI, WeMO), and their one- to three-month lags. Two scenarios are tested: Scenario 1 uses SPI and teleconnection lags only, while Scenario 2 additionally includes lagged SRI values (SRI_lag1–3) to represent hydrological memory. A train-only Variance Inflation Factor (VIF > 10) procedure is applied to remove multicollinearity without data leakage. In Basin 1, SRI lags were excluded due to strong collinearity with SPI lags (r = 0.984), resulting in identical inputs for both scenarios. In Basin 2, SRI lags were retained to assess their predictive contribution. GBRT achieved the best overall performance across both basins and scenarios, with mean RMSE, NSE, and KGE values of 0.0682, 0.9907, and 0.8945, respectively. TiDE ranked second overall, with a mean RMSE of 0.1166, followed by A-N-HiTS in third place with a mean RMSE of 0.1203 and A-N-BEATS with the weakest overall performance, with a mean RMSE of 0.2159. These results indicate that gradient-boosted trees remain highly competitive with neural models for small monthly hydrological datasets and that the value of hydrological memory is basin-dependent and varies according to its independence from concurrent meteorological forcing.
SN  - 2073-4433
ER  -