GIS-based multi-criteria spatial decision support for equitable public toilet planning: mapping accessibility deficits, site suitability and priority intervention zones in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Spatial Decision Support, Space Science and Geospatial Institute
- 2Department of Urban Planning and Development, Ethiopian Civil Service University
- 3Department of Digital Image Processing, Space Science and Geospatial Institute
- 4Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University
Abstract
Rapid urbanization frequently outpaces sanitation infrastructure, leaving vulnerable residents without essential services. This study develops and applies a GIS-based spatial decision-support framework combining multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and network-based accessibility analysis to assess location suitability and prioritize public toilet development in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Eight spatial criteria, population density, proximity to public activity nodes, road connectivity, distance from existing facilities, land use/land cover, slope, soil characteristics, and proximity to rivers were standardized on a 1–5 suitability scale. A field inventory of 339 georeferenced facilities, constraint masking, network service-area analysis, and sensitivity analysis produced three principal findings. First, accessibility is severely deficient: only 25.07% of residents (822,514 of 3,280,422) live within the normative 500 m walking distance to public toilets; 74.93% lies beyond it. Second, provision is maldistributed: the highest-density population class records a provision ratio of 0.90 against 1.39 in the second-highest, with Addis Ketema and Yeka each serving ~ 13,400 residents per facility. Third, expert weights are internally consistent (CR = 0.0152), with demand and accessibility criteria receiving 79.2% of total weight. Suitability mapping classified 20.46% of the city (87.97 km²) as high/very-high suitability. Overlaying suitability with service deficits and building-footprint constraints delineated a priority development envelope of 25.43 km² (5.91% of the city). Robustness testing across alternative weights and thresholds demonstrated stable spatial priorities (Jaccard similarity 0.60–0.97; AUC = 0.864). This framework provides municipal planners a transparent, reproducible basis for prioritizing sanitation investment, whilst acknowledging that tenure screening, community engagement, disability-responsive design, and environmental compliance remain essential.
Related
- Integrating land-use dynamics, water quality, and multi-criteria ecological suitability for fish sanctuary prioritization in three major river basins of Bangladesh
- Seasonal Aridity Characterisation and AHP-Weighted Multi-Criteria Land Suitability Assessment for Cotton in a Semi-Arid Taluka of Saurashtra, Gujarat, India
- Optimization of UV-C irradiation time for biologically treated saline wastewater using artificial neural networks and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework
- A novel integrated objective-subjective weighting method using principal component analysis to correct overrepresentation of correlated criteria in sustainability decision-making
- A historical data curation (HDC) framework integrated with GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis to inform flood risk prioritization in data-scarce regions
BibTeX
@article{engda2026gisbased,
title = {{GIS-based multi-criteria spatial decision support for equitable public toilet planning: mapping accessibility deficits, site suitability and priority intervention zones in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia}},
author = {Esubalew Mulugeta Engda and Mesfin Herchema and Ziyen Achamyeleh Mekonnen and Kanenus Fufa Dararo and Firdissa Sadeta Tiye and Muralitharan Jothimani},
journal = {City and Built Environment},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1007/s44213-026-00088-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44213-026-00088-5},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - GIS-based multi-criteria spatial decision support for equitable public toilet planning: mapping accessibility deficits, site suitability and priority intervention zones in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
AU - Esubalew Mulugeta Engda
AU - Mesfin Herchema
AU - Ziyen Achamyeleh Mekonnen
AU - Kanenus Fufa Dararo
AU - Firdissa Sadeta Tiye
AU - Muralitharan Jothimani
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - City and Built Environment
DO - 10.1007/s44213-026-00088-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44213-026-00088-5
AB - Rapid urbanization frequently outpaces sanitation infrastructure, leaving vulnerable residents without essential services. This study develops and applies a GIS-based spatial decision-support framework combining multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and network-based accessibility analysis to assess location suitability and prioritize public toilet development in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Eight spatial criteria, population density, proximity to public activity nodes, road connectivity, distance from existing facilities, land use/land cover, slope, soil characteristics, and proximity to rivers were standardized on a 1–5 suitability scale. A field inventory of 339 georeferenced facilities, constraint masking, network service-area analysis, and sensitivity analysis produced three principal findings. First, accessibility is severely deficient: only 25.07% of residents (822,514 of 3,280,422) live within the normative 500 m walking distance to public toilets; 74.93% lies beyond it. Second, provision is maldistributed: the highest-density population class records a provision ratio of 0.90 against 1.39 in the second-highest, with Addis Ketema and Yeka each serving ~ 13,400 residents per facility. Third, expert weights are internally consistent (CR = 0.0152), with demand and accessibility criteria receiving 79.2% of total weight. Suitability mapping classified 20.46% of the city (87.97 km²) as high/very-high suitability. Overlaying suitability with service deficits and building-footprint constraints delineated a priority development envelope of 25.43 km² (5.91% of the city). Robustness testing across alternative weights and thresholds demonstrated stable spatial priorities (Jaccard similarity 0.60–0.97; AUC = 0.864). This framework provides municipal planners a transparent, reproducible basis for prioritizing sanitation investment, whilst acknowledging that tenure screening, community engagement, disability-responsive design, and environmental compliance remain essential.
SN - 2435-7936
ER -