Incision orientation and scar formation in the shoulder area: a prospective multicenter study

Abstract

Optimal skin incision orientation in the shoulder remains debated: textbook guidelines recommend horizontal incisions, while the intraoperative pinch test suggests an upright orientation, and no consensus exists among tension-line concepts such as Langer’s, Kraissl’s, or more recent ones. In this prospective multicenter comparative study with partial randomization and blinded photographic assessment, we evaluated scar formation following horizontal, upright, and oblique incisions at 44 shoulder excision sites from 38 patients across three German centers (2020–2022), using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at 3 and 6 weeks. For the primary endpoint, the 6-week observer-reported overall POSAS score, no significant differences were observed between orientations. In exploratory analyses, upright incisions were among the best-rated by patients and observers at 6 weeks and showed significant improvement over time in thickness, elasticity, and vascularity, while oblique incisions showed significant pigmentation improvement; horizontal incisions did not improve. Subregion analyses showed higher stiffness and thickness scores for upright incisions, and worse overall scores for oblique incisions, in the lateral versus medial subregion. As the primary endpoint was non-significant, these exploratory findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating, positioning upright incisions as a promising candidate for early scar improvement warranting confirmation in larger, adequately powered studies.

Clinical Outcomes of the H-Shaped Incision in the Surgical Management of Naso-Orbito-Ethmoidal Fractures: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Effie Edsor, Prabhusankar K, Srinisha M +3
Cureus27 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
Divergence Between Pain and Functional Recovery After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Visual Analogue Scale, Constant-Murley Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Scores
Sanket Mishra, Ananta N Panda, Shubhranshu Choudhary +3
Cureus19 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
Validated Assessment of Ejaculatory and Erectile Function After Unilateral “Z”-Shaped Bladder Neck Incision (ZANCLE): A Prospective Study Using the MSHQ-EjD Short Form and IIEF-5
Alessandro Calarco, Pietro Morgia, Carlo Maria Scornajenghi +4
Journal of Clinical Medicine5 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
Effect of Hand Grip Exercise on Rotator Cuff Strength and Shoulder Function Recovery after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Byeong Sun Park, Seung Ik Cho, Da Hui Jeong +4
Clinics in orthopedic surgery11 Aug 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
Three-Month Ocular Surface and Dry-Eye Outcomes After Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Implantation versus Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Cohort Study
Huiyi Du, Huiqing Zhang, Anqi Yuan +1
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)30 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@article{olsavszky2026incision,
  title = {{Incision orientation and scar formation in the shoulder area: a prospective multicenter study}},
  author = {Victor Olsavszky and Olivier Ballo and Franca Christ and Philipp Enno Marquet and Sophia Kivelitz and Angelika Wachendorff and Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch and Gerd Gauglitz and Guido Bruning and Christian Kunte and Moritz Felcht},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-76144-1},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76144-1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Incision orientation and scar formation in the shoulder area: a prospective multicenter study
AU  - Victor Olsavszky
AU  - Olivier Ballo
AU  - Franca Christ
AU  - Philipp Enno Marquet
AU  - Sophia Kivelitz
AU  - Angelika Wachendorff
AU  - Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch
AU  - Gerd Gauglitz
AU  - Guido Bruning
AU  - Christian Kunte
AU  - Moritz Felcht
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-76144-1
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76144-1
AB  - Optimal skin incision orientation in the shoulder remains debated: textbook guidelines recommend horizontal incisions, while the intraoperative pinch test suggests an upright orientation, and no consensus exists among tension-line concepts such as Langer’s, Kraissl’s, or more recent ones. In this prospective multicenter comparative study with partial randomization and blinded photographic assessment, we evaluated scar formation following horizontal, upright, and oblique incisions at 44 shoulder excision sites from 38 patients across three German centers (2020–2022), using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at 3 and 6 weeks. For the primary endpoint, the 6-week observer-reported overall POSAS score, no significant differences were observed between orientations. In exploratory analyses, upright incisions were among the best-rated by patients and observers at 6 weeks and showed significant improvement over time in thickness, elasticity, and vascularity, while oblique incisions showed significant pigmentation improvement; horizontal incisions did not improve. Subregion analyses showed higher stiffness and thickness scores for upright incisions, and worse overall scores for oblique incisions, in the lateral versus medial subregion. As the primary endpoint was non-significant, these exploratory findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating, positioning upright incisions as a promising candidate for early scar improvement warranting confirmation in larger, adequately powered studies.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite