Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

  1. 1Faculty of Health Services, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
  2. 2Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF). Existing AF prediction scores were developed primarily in general populations, and their transportability to patients with COPD remains insufficiently established. This study aimed to develop and temporally validate a novel, disease-specific AF prediction model for patients with COPD.Methods

A total of 8385 COPD patients without prior AF from the UK Biobank (UKB) were included. Participants recruited in 2006-2009 formed the development set and those recruited in 2010 formed a temporal validation set. Cox proportional hazards, Elastic Net, random survival forest, and DeepSurv models were developed using clinical, biochemical, treatment-related, and genetic predictors. Performance was assessed using C-index, time-dependent AUC, Brier score, calibration, and decision-curve analysis, with 95% confidence intervals from 1000 participant-level bootstrap samples. Models were compared with CHARGE-AF and HARMS₂-AF.Results

During a median follow-up of 14.17 years, 1402 participants developed AF. Internal validation C-indices were 0.748 for Cox, 0.750 for Elastic Net, 0.738 for random survival forest, and 0.745 for DeepSurv; temporal validation values were 0.705, 0.706, 0.696, and 0.712, respectively. In temporal validation, Elastic Net showed higher discrimination than CHARGE-AF (C-index difference, 0.047; 95% CI, 0.022-0.073) and HARMS₂-AF (0.061; 95% CI, 0.032-0.090). Decision-curve analysis suggested potential clinical utility across selected 5-year thresholds. The Elastic Net model was implemented in an interactive web application.Conclusion

AF risk prediction in COPD achieved moderate discrimination across several modeling approaches. The developed models showed higher discrimination than published AF risk scores in several analyses, particularly in temporal validation, supporting further evaluation of individualized AF risk stratification in patients with COPD.

Related

  1. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of mortality in ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure
    Jiayi Shen, Yucheng Liu, Yikun Chen
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development and Internal Validation of a Retrospective Prediction Model for Fungal Infections in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Xiaolan Chen, Mingyan Wu, Jingjing Wang +2
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMC
  3. Risk factor analysis and development of a risk prediction model for facial pressure injury associated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on symptom science theory
    Chen Cheng, Lulu Cui, Changhai Wang +14
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Three-Month Unplanned Readmission in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Shuyu Yu, Haocheng Wei, Qiang Chen +3
    International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  5. Integrated transcriptomic and clinical prediction model for malignant pulmonary nodules : Model development, external dataset evaluation, and single-center expression validation
    Xingshu Zhang, Jie Yang, Ming Gong +2
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{xiao2026development,
  title = {{Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.}},
  author = {Xiaochun Xiao and Yingyi Qin and Chi Peng and Dongdong Li and Mengling Kuang and Yufei Gao and Cheng Wu},
  journal = {International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/copd.s641195},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968986},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
AU  - Xiaochun Xiao
AU  - Yingyi Qin
AU  - Chi Peng
AU  - Dongdong Li
AU  - Mengling Kuang
AU  - Yufei Gao
AU  - Cheng Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
DO  - 10.2147/copd.s641195
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968986
AB  - Background  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF). Existing AF prediction scores were developed primarily in general populations, and their transportability to patients with COPD remains insufficiently established. This study aimed to develop and temporally validate a novel, disease-specific AF prediction model for patients with COPD.Methods  A total of 8385 COPD patients without prior AF from the UK Biobank (UKB) were included. Participants recruited in 2006-2009 formed the development set and those recruited in 2010 formed a temporal validation set. Cox proportional hazards, Elastic Net, random survival forest, and DeepSurv models were developed using clinical, biochemical, treatment-related, and genetic predictors. Performance was assessed using C-index, time-dependent AUC, Brier score, calibration, and decision-curve analysis, with 95% confidence intervals from 1000 participant-level bootstrap samples. Models were compared with CHARGE-AF and HARMS₂-AF.Results  During a median follow-up of 14.17 years, 1402 participants developed AF. Internal validation C-indices were 0.748 for Cox, 0.750 for Elastic Net, 0.738 for random survival forest, and 0.745 for DeepSurv; temporal validation values were 0.705, 0.706, 0.696, and 0.712, respectively. In temporal validation, Elastic Net showed higher discrimination than CHARGE-AF (C-index difference, 0.047; 95% CI, 0.022-0.073) and HARMS₂-AF (0.061; 95% CI, 0.032-0.090). Decision-curve analysis suggested potential clinical utility across selected 5-year thresholds. The Elastic Net model was implemented in an interactive web application.Conclusion  AF risk prediction in COPD achieved moderate discrimination across several modeling approaches. The developed models showed higher discrimination than published AF risk scores in several analyses, particularly in temporal validation, supporting further evaluation of individualized AF risk stratification in patients with COPD.
SN  - 1176-9106
SN  - 1178-2005
ER  -