What is Smoothness?
Abstract
Smoothness of a function on the real line is reflected in the decay of its Fourier transform, which suggests that smoothness of a function in L2(G) for a group G should mean concentration of the Fourier coefficients at low frequency. Such a reading presupposes an ordering of the irreducible representations of G, but for non-abelian G, no ordering is canonical. Given a symmetric generating set S, the Laplacian of the associated Cayley graph is block diagonal over the dual, and we order the irreps by the mean of the eigenvalues in each block. This produces an ordering function ω:Ĝ→ℝ that depends only on the pair (G,S). This function is bounded between zero and two, vanishing only at the trivial representation and achieving the upper bound exactly when the Cayley graph is bipartite. We then ask how much freedom the construction has. Within the class of operators satisfying natural axioms, the induced orderings are exactly the real functions on the dual vanishing at the trivial representation and agreeing on conjugate pairs, and the orderings coming from inversion orbits of conjugacy classes form a basis for them. We cut the freedom down further by requiring two additional inputs: nonnegativity of the class weights and a declaration of which group elements count as uniform incremental changes, which pins the operator to the Cayley-Laplacian up to positive scale. We observe that the construction persists for compact groups even though the Cayley graph does not, and we extend the theory to finite sets carrying a transitive group action, where the acting group selects which frequencies exist and the generating set orders them. The answer to the title question is therefore that smoothness is a property of a function together with a choice of group and generating set, not of the function alone.
Related
- Improved Guarantees for Langevin Monte Carlo with Average Smoothness
- Smoothness estimation for Whittle–Matérn processes on closed Riemannian manifolds
- Regularity for Minimizers of Mixed-Smoothness Variational Integrals
- K2-regularity is equivalent to smoothness for toric varieties
- Smoothness criterion for Fano orbifolds and bases of Lagrangian fibrations
BibTeX
@misc{bradshaw2026what,
title = {{What is Smoothness?}},
author = {Zachary P Bradshaw},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03246},
eprint = {2609.03246},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03246},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - What is Smoothness?
AU - Zachary P Bradshaw
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03246
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03246
AB - Smoothness of a function on the real line is reflected in the decay of its Fourier transform, which suggests that smoothness of a function in L^2(G) for a group G should mean concentration of the Fourier coefficients at low frequency. Such a reading presupposes an ordering of the irreducible representations of G, but for non-abelian G, no ordering is canonical. Given a symmetric generating set S, the Laplacian of the associated Cayley graph is block diagonal over the dual, and we order the irreps by the mean of the eigenvalues in each block. This produces an ordering function ω:Ĝ→ℝ that depends only on the pair (G,S). This function is bounded between zero and two, vanishing only at the trivial representation and achieving the upper bound exactly when the Cayley graph is bipartite. We then ask how much freedom the construction has. Within the class of operators satisfying natural axioms, the induced orderings are exactly the real functions on the dual vanishing at the trivial representation and agreeing on conjugate pairs, and the orderings coming from inversion orbits of conjugacy classes form a basis for them. We cut the freedom down further by requiring two additional inputs: nonnegativity of the class weights and a declaration of which group elements count as uniform incremental changes, which pins the operator to the Cayley-Laplacian up to positive scale. We observe that the construction persists for compact groups even though the Cayley graph does not, and we extend the theory to finite sets carrying a transitive group action, where the acting group selects which frequencies exist and the generating set orders them. The answer to the title question is therefore that smoothness is a property of a function together with a choice of group and generating set, not of the function alone.
ER -