Longitudinal AI Models Predict Cancer Adverse Events
Abstract
Clinical interventions for cancer treatment toxicities can reduce morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost, if high risk patients can be identified. We developed SPARC, a transformer-based foundation model, using real-world, longitudinal, routinely collected health measurements, to predict adverse event risk. Pre-training and fine-tuning SPARC on 101,920,379 measurements from 224,047 patients with cancer led to state-of-the-art performance at predicting cancer-related adverse events on (i) held-out data from the development cohort, (ii) a prospective validation cohort from the same center (Npatients=23,126), (iii) multiple publicly available external datasets (Npatients=26,012), and (iv) external, multi-hospital cohorts (Npatients=562,620, 206,840). SPARC generalized to multiple external centers and identified patients most likely to benefit from an intervention (G-CSF). Pooled multi-institution, more than single-institution, fine-tuning improved generalizability. We release SPARC as a community resource. Our results highlight the utility of AI time series models in oncologic management.
Related
- Adaptive MR-guided whole-pelvic SBRT with or without focal intraprostatic lesion boost for high-risk localized prostate Cancer: Adverse events and longitudinal quality-of-life outcomes
- An explainable artificial intelligence framework using electrocardiograms to predict mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events
- von Willebrand Factor and ADAMTS13 Predict Therapeutic Efficacy and Severe Adverse Events in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab.
- PhysioFusion: A Multi-Modal Ensemble using Static Preoperative Variables and Time Series Intraoperative Data to Predict Adverse Events Following Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Dynamic near-term risk prediction of clinically significant immune-related adverse events using longitudinal electronic health records
BibTeX
@misc{fu2026longitudinal,
title = {{Longitudinal AI Models Predict Cancer Adverse Events}},
author = {Chenlian Fu and Jie (Jennifer) Yu and Ruian (Ian) Shi and Michele Waters and Mitchell Pavlak and Andrea Arfe and Sohrab P. Shah and Alexis Battle and Kenneth L. Kehl and Brian M. Bot and US Cancer AI Alliance (CAIA) and Nikolaus Schultz and Quaid Morris and Justin Jee},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.22.26364879},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.22.26364879v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Longitudinal AI Models Predict Cancer Adverse Events
AU - Chenlian Fu
AU - Jie (Jennifer) Yu
AU - Ruian (Ian) Shi
AU - Michele Waters
AU - Mitchell Pavlak
AU - Andrea Arfe
AU - Sohrab P. Shah
AU - Alexis Battle
AU - Kenneth L. Kehl
AU - Brian M. Bot
AU - US Cancer AI Alliance (CAIA)
AU - Nikolaus Schultz
AU - Quaid Morris
AU - Justin Jee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.22.26364879
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.22.26364879v1
AB - Clinical interventions for cancer treatment toxicities can reduce morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost, if high risk patients can be identified. We developed SPARC, a transformer-based foundation model, using real-world, longitudinal, routinely collected health measurements, to predict adverse event risk. Pre-training and fine-tuning SPARC on 101,920,379 measurements from 224,047 patients with cancer led to state-of-the-art performance at predicting cancer-related adverse events on (i) held-out data from the development cohort, (ii) a prospective validation cohort from the same center (Npatients=23,126), (iii) multiple publicly available external datasets (Npatients=26,012), and (iv) external, multi-hospital cohorts (Npatients=562,620, 206,840). SPARC generalized to multiple external centers and identified patients most likely to benefit from an intervention (G-CSF). Pooled multi-institution, more than single-institution, fine-tuning improved generalizability. We release SPARC as a community resource. Our results highlight the utility of AI time series models in oncologic management.
ER -