Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Use of Osteopathic Counterstrain for Postoperative Incisional Pain Following Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Case Report

  1. 1General Surgery, Central Surgical Associates, Jackson, USA
  2. 2General Surgery, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Monroe, USA
  3. 3Surgery, Willis-Knighton, Shreveport, USA

Abstract

Postoperative pain is commonly managed using multimodal analgesic strategies. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has been investigated as an adjunct to conventional postoperative care, although evidence regarding individual osteopathic techniques remains limited. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed focal pain at trocar sites following robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair with gastropexy. On postoperative day one, osteopathic evaluation identified localized tenderness corresponding to bilateral anterior thoracic 9 (AT9) counterstrain tender points. The patient reported an incisional pain score of 3/10, while tenderness at the identified points was assigned a baseline value of 10/10 for assessment during treatment. Following initial positioning into the counterstrain position of ease, the patient reported complete resolution of tenderness, with the tenderness score decreasing to 0/10 and remaining 0/10 throughout the 90-second treatment interval and following return to neutral. She subsequently reported no further abdominal pain during the remainder of her hospitalization and was discharged on postoperative day 3 following an upper gastrointestinal contrast study demonstrating no evidence of contrast leakage near the hiatal hernia repair. This case describes the application of osteopathic counterstrain for focal postoperative tenderness following minimally invasive surgery. Because this is a single-patient observation without a control condition, the observed temporal association cannot establish treatment efficacy, causality, or a specific relationship between the identified tender points and the surgical sites. Further controlled investigation is warranted to determine whether this response is reproducible and specific to counterstrain.

Related

  1. Incisional Hernia After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
    Arthur Peyrottes, Olivier Oberlin, Michael Baboudjian +6
    European urology open sciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Pfannenstiel versus periumbilical specimen extraction in laparoscopic low anterior resection: a comparative analysis of incisional hernia risk, postoperative recovery, and oncologic outcomes.
    Seung Yeon Kang, Dong Hyun Shin, Hyeon Woo Bae +6
    Techniques in coloproctologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Incisional Hernia Following Ileostomy Closure: Incidence and Associated Factors in a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Ahmed Tawfik, Khaldoun Fozo
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Postoperative C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of the Early Inflammatory Response in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. A case report-prone position ventilation as an ECMO sparing strategy for re-expansion pulmonary edema following minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    Alok Sonthalia, Charles Chan, Rana Sayeed +2
    Saudi journal of anaesthesiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{ponce2026osteopathic,
  title = {{Use of Osteopathic Counterstrain for Postoperative Incisional Pain Following Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Case Report}},
  author = {Alexander Ponce and Alexander D Gendreau and Sahana R Padumane and Spencer Hays and Mark H Smith},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117101},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716539},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Use of Osteopathic Counterstrain for Postoperative Incisional Pain Following Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Case Report
AU  - Alexander Ponce
AU  - Alexander D Gendreau
AU  - Sahana R Padumane
AU  - Spencer Hays
AU  - Mark H Smith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117101
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13716539
AB  - Postoperative pain is commonly managed using multimodal analgesic strategies. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has been investigated as an adjunct to conventional postoperative care, although evidence regarding individual osteopathic techniques remains limited. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed focal pain at trocar sites following robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair with gastropexy. On postoperative day one, osteopathic evaluation identified localized tenderness corresponding to bilateral anterior thoracic 9 (AT9) counterstrain tender points. The patient reported an incisional pain score of 3/10, while tenderness at the identified points was assigned a baseline value of 10/10 for assessment during treatment. Following initial positioning into the counterstrain position of ease, the patient reported complete resolution of tenderness, with the tenderness score decreasing to 0/10 and remaining 0/10 throughout the 90-second treatment interval and following return to neutral. She subsequently reported no further abdominal pain during the remainder of her hospitalization and was discharged on postoperative day 3 following an upper gastrointestinal contrast study demonstrating no evidence of contrast leakage near the hiatal hernia repair. This case describes the application of osteopathic counterstrain for focal postoperative tenderness following minimally invasive surgery. Because this is a single-patient observation without a control condition, the observed temporal association cannot establish treatment efficacy, causality, or a specific relationship between the identified tender points and the surgical sites. Further controlled investigation is warranted to determine whether this response is reproducible and specific to counterstrain.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -