Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of clinical medicine

Pre-Resection Endoscopic Features in T1 Colorectal Cancer Selected for Salvage Surgery After ESD/EID: An Exploratory Comparison of SM1 and SM2–3 Invasion

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
  2. 2Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
  3. 3Brzeziny Specialist Hospital, 95-060 Brzeziny, Poland
  4. 4Military Medical Academy Memorial Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Lodz—Central Veteran Hospital, 90-549 Lodz, Poland

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate assessment of submucosal invasion is important when selecting patients with early colorectal cancer for organ-preserving treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) enable en bloc resection and detailed histopathological assessment. This study explored whether routinely recorded pre-resection endoscopic characteristics differed between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions within a selected cohort of patients who underwent salvage surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent ESD or EID and subsequently underwent salvage surgery because of non-curative histopathological findings. Among the 43 included patients, 37 underwent ESD and 6 underwent EID. Pre-resection Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification were compared according to final histopathological depth of submucosal invasion. Exploratory univariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with SM2–3 invasion. Results: Five patients had SM1 invasion and 38 had SM2–3 invasion. No statistically significant differences in the evaluated baseline or endoscopic variables were observed between the two groups. Exploratory regression estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals, reflecting the small number of SM1 cases. Conclusions: In this selected cohort of patients undergoing salvage surgery after non-curative ESD/EID, Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification did not show statistically significant differences between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions. Because curatively treated patients were not included and only five patients had SM1 invasion, these findings do not estimate the diagnostic performance of these classifications in the broader pre-resection population and should be considered hypothesis-generating.

Related

  1. Cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps 15 mm or smaller: delayed bleeding and resection outcomes in a retrospective cohort.
    Hyun Young Kim
    BMC gastroenterologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Age-stratified gradients of colorectal neoplasia and an exploratory endoscopic red-flag composite in a lesion-confirmed screening colonoscopy cohort
    Lina Du, Jingzhi Su, Jihua Dai +9
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Clinical, endoscopic, and pathological features of synchronous multiple early-stage colorectal cancer: a two-center retrospective case–control study
    Ranran Zeng, Xingting Guo, Jing Ning +8
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Endoscopic transorbital approach for resection of Meckel’s cave aspergillosis: illustrative case
    Raywat Noiphithak, Krit Khunvirojpanich, Putch Phairintr +1
    Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessonsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Short-Term Outcomes of Outpatient Endoscopic Resection for Selected Superficial Gastric Neoplasms: A Predominantly EMR-Based Real-World Cohort Study
    Seung-Jun Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{marynczak2026preresection,
  title = {{Pre-Resection Endoscopic Features in T1 Colorectal Cancer Selected for Salvage Surgery After ESD/EID: An Exploratory Comparison of SM1 and SM2–3 Invasion}},
  author = {Kasper Maryńczak and Julia Adamkiewicz and Jacek Kabziński and Aleksandra Osielczak and Przemysław Kasprzyk and Adam Dziki and Michał Spychalski and Ireneusz Majsterek and Łukasz Dziki},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197634},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665848},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pre-Resection Endoscopic Features in T1 Colorectal Cancer Selected for Salvage Surgery After ESD/EID: An Exploratory Comparison of SM1 and SM2–3 Invasion
AU  - Kasper Maryńczak
AU  - Julia Adamkiewicz
AU  - Jacek Kabziński
AU  - Aleksandra Osielczak
AU  - Przemysław Kasprzyk
AU  - Adam Dziki
AU  - Michał Spychalski
AU  - Ireneusz Majsterek
AU  - Łukasz Dziki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197634
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665848
AB  - Background/Objectives: Accurate assessment of submucosal invasion is important when selecting patients with early colorectal cancer for organ-preserving treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) enable en bloc resection and detailed histopathological assessment. This study explored whether routinely recorded pre-resection endoscopic characteristics differed between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions within a selected cohort of patients who underwent salvage surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent ESD or EID and subsequently underwent salvage surgery because of non-curative histopathological findings. Among the 43 included patients, 37 underwent ESD and 6 underwent EID. Pre-resection Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification were compared according to final histopathological depth of submucosal invasion. Exploratory univariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with SM2–3 invasion. Results: Five patients had SM1 invasion and 38 had SM2–3 invasion. No statistically significant differences in the evaluated baseline or endoscopic variables were observed between the two groups. Exploratory regression estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals, reflecting the small number of SM1 cases. Conclusions: In this selected cohort of patients undergoing salvage surgery after non-curative ESD/EID, Paris morphology and pit-pattern classification did not show statistically significant differences between SM1 and SM2–3 lesions. Because curatively treated patients were not included and only five patients had SM1 invasion, these findings do not estimate the diagnostic performance of these classifications in the broader pre-resection population and should be considered hypothesis-generating.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -