Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,688 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0AGU Advances

Fifty Years Later: Revisiting Viking 2 Seismic Signals Through InSight

4 affiliations
  1. 1SKLab‐DeepMinE MOEKLab‐OBCE School of Earth and Space Sciences Peking University Beijing China
  2. 2State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics and Forecasting Peking University Beijing China
  3. 3The Viking Seismology Team Pasadena CA USA
  4. 4Retired

Abstract

For nearly 50 years, the origin of the candidate seismic signals recorded by Viking 2 remained unresolved because of limited instrumental sensitivity, onboard observation, data compression, and the absence of Martian seismic context. Here we reconstruct the Viking seismic workflow and reinterpret the two Viking candidate events, recorded on sol 53 and sol 80, using the seismic context established by InSight. We show that the Viking seismometer was optimized for high‐spectral‐frequency seismic signals, consequently reducing its sensitivity to low‐spectral‐frequency events. If the original 10‐s S‐P travel‐time difference is correct, the inferred location of the sol 80 event overlaps the broad northern‐plains source region suggested for the seasonally recurrent high‐spectral‐frequency and 2.4‐Hz marsquake populations observed by InSight. Alternatively, if the first‐arrival phase represents a crustal conversion phase rather than a direct P wave, the sol 80 event corresponds to a distant tectonic (low‐spectral‐frequency or broadband) marsquake with an estimated moment magnitude of M W 4.6–4.8 or M W 4.9–5.1. A meteorite impact origin cannot be excluded either. The two Viking seismic signals decay more rapidly than typical InSight marsquakes, suggesting heterogeneity in the Martian attenuation structure. Together, these findings integrate Viking observations into the modern framework of Martian seismicity, illustrating how a legacy planetary data set can acquire renewed scientific implications when re‐examined in light of subsequent mission data.

Related

  1. A Technical Reanalysis of the Viking Carbon Assimilation-Pyrolytic Release Experiment
    Jan Spacek, Clay A. Abraham, Steven A. Benner
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
  2. Revisiting self-interacting dark matter with DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation observations
    Yixuan Zhu, Shuo Cao, Xuanni chen +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsCosmologyCrossref
  3. Revisiting the Einstein Cross with X-shooter spectra: New estimates of accretion disk parameters and broad emission line profiles from microlensing
    R. Jerez-Nicurcar, A. Esteban-Gutiérrez, V. Motta +1
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Shallow lunar fractures dominate the long-lasting seismic coda
    Lei Zhang, Qian Huang, Minghao Huang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlanetary science & exoplanetsGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  5. What powers the most energetic flares in the field? Kepler. Revisiting the superflaring star KIC 2852961
    Zs. Kővári, B. Seli, L. Kriskovics +11
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{xiao2026fifty,
  title = {{Fifty Years Later: Revisiting Viking 2 Seismic Signals Through InSight}},
  author = {Wanbo Xiao and Jiaqi Li and Yanbin Wang and Andrew Lazarewicz},
  journal = {AGU Advances},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1029/2026av002319},
  url = {https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026AV002319},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Fifty Years Later: Revisiting Viking 2 Seismic Signals Through InSight
AU  - Wanbo Xiao
AU  - Jiaqi Li
AU  - Yanbin Wang
AU  - Andrew Lazarewicz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - AGU Advances
DO  - 10.1029/2026av002319
UR  - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026AV002319
AB  - For nearly 50 years, the origin of the candidate seismic signals recorded by Viking 2 remained unresolved because of limited instrumental sensitivity, onboard observation, data compression, and the absence of Martian seismic context. Here we reconstruct the Viking seismic workflow and reinterpret the two Viking candidate events, recorded on sol 53 and sol 80, using the seismic context established by InSight. We show that the Viking seismometer was optimized for high‐spectral‐frequency seismic signals, consequently reducing its sensitivity to low‐spectral‐frequency events. If the original 10‐s S‐P travel‐time difference is correct, the inferred location of the sol 80 event overlaps the broad northern‐plains source region suggested for the seasonally recurrent high‐spectral‐frequency and 2.4‐Hz marsquake populations observed by InSight. Alternatively, if the first‐arrival phase represents a crustal conversion phase rather than a direct P wave, the sol 80 event corresponds to a distant tectonic (low‐spectral‐frequency or broadband) marsquake with an estimated moment magnitude of M W 4.6–4.8 or M W 4.9–5.1. A meteorite impact origin cannot be excluded either. The two Viking seismic signals decay more rapidly than typical InSight marsquakes, suggesting heterogeneity in the Martian attenuation structure. Together, these findings integrate Viking observations into the modern framework of Martian seismicity, illustrating how a legacy planetary data set can acquire renewed scientific implications when re‐examined in light of subsequent mission data.
SN  - 2576-604X
SN  - 2576-604X
ER  -