Paediatric escalation area and corridor care in the Emergency Department, a secondary analysis of the UNCORKED study
- 1Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
Abstract
ObjectiveTo describe the use of, and outcomes following, Emergency Department (ED) escalation area care among children.
DesignTwo-stage prospective multicentre observational study. Stage one was a cross-sectional snapshot study reporting the point prevalence of escalation area care; stage two was an observational cohort study of eligible participants present in the EDs during snapshots.
Setting5 snapshots of 96 type 1 UK EDs. 83/96 (86.5%) of sites were mixed EDs and 13 sites were paediatric-only EDs.
PatientsPatient level data was collected on those who experienced escalation area care and/or were admitted.
OutcomesThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients cared for in escalation areas in paediatric-only EDs. Secondary outcomes were demographics, length of stay (LOS), 28-day mortality, type of escalation area experienced and time in escalation areas in all ED types; stratified by escalation area experience.
Results6.6% (n=75/1132) of patients in paediatric-only EDs were receiving escalation area care during the study snapshots, the majority of this occurred in a minority of departments. Across all ED types, 15.4% (n=104/675) of admitted children experienced escalation area care during their ED stay. 124/244 (50.8%) of those cared for in escalation areas were cared for in a non-clinical area such as a corridor. 9.6% (n=8/83) of mixed EDs reported caring for adults in paediatric areas. Three children died within 28 days; all admitted to hospital without experiencing escalation area care. Hospital LOS was 2.00 days (1.00, 3.00) for those in escalation areas and 2.00 days (2.00, 4.00) for those not cared for in escalation areas.
ConclusionsEscalation area care is a common and systemic feature of paediatric emergency care in the UK which requires urgent action to ensure children are cared for in appropriate environments.
Related
- Implementation and Performance of a Clinical Debriefing Programme in a Paediatric Emergency Department: A Descriptive Qualitative Review
- From De-escalation to Restraint: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Clinician Decision-Making in Patient Agitation.
- Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
- Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism With Concurrent Benztropine-Associated Anticholinergic Effects in a Community Emergency Department Setting: A Case Report
BibTeX
@misc{anakebe2026paediatric,
title = {{Paediatric escalation area and corridor care in the Emergency Department, a secondary analysis of the UNCORKED study}},
author = {C. Anakebe and D. R. Owens and D. R. Roland and F. Birse and R. D. McHenry and B. Clarke and T. Roberts and Trainee Emergency Research Network UNCORKED study group},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.02.26362046},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362046v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Paediatric escalation area and corridor care in the Emergency Department, a secondary analysis of the UNCORKED study
AU - C. Anakebe
AU - D. R. Owens
AU - D. R. Roland
AU - F. Birse
AU - R. D. McHenry
AU - B. Clarke
AU - T. Roberts
AU - Trainee Emergency Research Network UNCORKED study group
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.02.26362046
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362046v1
AB - ObjectiveTo describe the use of, and outcomes following, Emergency Department (ED) escalation area care among children. DesignTwo-stage prospective multicentre observational study. Stage one was a cross-sectional snapshot study reporting the point prevalence of escalation area care; stage two was an observational cohort study of eligible participants present in the EDs during snapshots. Setting5 snapshots of 96 type 1 UK EDs. 83/96 (86.5%) of sites were mixed EDs and 13 sites were paediatric-only EDs. PatientsPatient level data was collected on those who experienced escalation area care and/or were admitted. OutcomesThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients cared for in escalation areas in paediatric-only EDs. Secondary outcomes were demographics, length of stay (LOS), 28-day mortality, type of escalation area experienced and time in escalation areas in all ED types; stratified by escalation area experience. Results6.6% (n=75/1132) of patients in paediatric-only EDs were receiving escalation area care during the study snapshots, the majority of this occurred in a minority of departments. Across all ED types, 15.4% (n=104/675) of admitted children experienced escalation area care during their ED stay. 124/244 (50.8%) of those cared for in escalation areas were cared for in a non-clinical area such as a corridor. 9.6% (n=8/83) of mixed EDs reported caring for adults in paediatric areas. Three children died within 28 days; all admitted to hospital without experiencing escalation area care. Hospital LOS was 2.00 days (1.00, 3.00) for those in escalation areas and 2.00 days (2.00, 4.00) for those not cared for in escalation areas. ConclusionsEscalation area care is a common and systemic feature of paediatric emergency care in the UK which requires urgent action to ensure children are cared for in appropriate environments.
ER -