Rivers unchained: A spatial optimization approach for prioritizing river barrier removal
6 affiliations
- 1Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland; Corresponding author.
- 2Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
- 3Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
- 4University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistokatu 2, 80100 Joensuu, Finland
- 5Finnish Environment Institute, Paavo Havaksen tie 3, 90570 Oulu, Finland
- 6Natural Resources Institute Finland, Survontie 9 A, 40500 Jyväskylä, Finland
Abstract
River fragmentation is a major constraint on ecological status and biodiversity in freshwater systems, creating a need for robust and operational tools to prioritize restoration. We develop a spatially explicit framework for prioritizing river barrier removal that integrates ecological indicators, river network connectivity, and economic constraints within a unified optimization approach. The framework combines a composite ecological benefit index with a dynamic, state-dependent representation of river network connectivity, allowing ecological gains from barrier removal to evolve as downstream and upstream conditions change. By linking connectivity, water quality, and species-specific habitat accessibility, the approach captures how restoration benefits depend on both local conditions and network structure. Applied at a national scale, the model reveals that ecological gains are highly non-linear and strongly shaped by network topology. Optimal restoration strategies form spatially coherent restoration corridors, where removing key bottlenecks unlocks extensive upstream habitats and guides subsequent removals within the same catchments. Restoration priorities vary with budget levels, hydropower opportunity costs, and policy objectives. Incorporating hydropower opportunity costs substantially alters restoration priorities, whereas alternative barrier-hydropower linkage formulations yield broadly similar aggregate outcomes once major hydropower assets are excluded from restoration portfolios. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that restoration outcomes are influenced by alternative ecological-response formulations and parameterizations but remain primarily driven by river-network structure and dynamic connectivity processes. The results highlight the importance of integrating ecological indicators with dynamic network processes in restoration planning and provide a generalizable framework for supporting large-scale river restoration under competing environmental and economic objectives.
Related
- Optimization of biomass production, morphology, architecture, and nutrient removal by Rhizopus oryzae M10A1 cultivated on potato starch processing effluents as a fungal cell factory.
- From Frequencies to Priorities: Interethnic Distribution of Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes as a Basis for Prioritizing Preemptive Testing in Russia’s Multiethnic Population
- An egocentric map prioritizing peri-personal space in the mouse rostro-lateral visual area
- Macrophage immunometabolic programming in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prioritizing TET2 and METTL3/m⁶A
- NeuronSifter: An Agent-in-Twin for Prioritizing Central Nervous System Interventions with World Action Models
BibTeX
@article{hyyrynen2026rivers,
title = {{Rivers unchained: A spatial optimization approach for prioritizing river barrier removal}},
author = {Matti Hyyrynen and Janne Artell and Pinja-Liina Jalkanen and Antti Iho and Jarno Turunen and Timo J. Ruokonen and Pauliina Louhi},
journal = {Ecological Indicators},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115590},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115590},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rivers unchained: A spatial optimization approach for prioritizing river barrier removal
AU - Matti Hyyrynen
AU - Janne Artell
AU - Pinja-Liina Jalkanen
AU - Antti Iho
AU - Jarno Turunen
AU - Timo J. Ruokonen
AU - Pauliina Louhi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Ecological Indicators
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115590
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115590
AB - River fragmentation is a major constraint on ecological status and biodiversity in freshwater systems, creating a need for robust and operational tools to prioritize restoration. We develop a spatially explicit framework for prioritizing river barrier removal that integrates ecological indicators, river network connectivity, and economic constraints within a unified optimization approach. The framework combines a composite ecological benefit index with a dynamic, state-dependent representation of river network connectivity, allowing ecological gains from barrier removal to evolve as downstream and upstream conditions change. By linking connectivity, water quality, and species-specific habitat accessibility, the approach captures how restoration benefits depend on both local conditions and network structure. Applied at a national scale, the model reveals that ecological gains are highly non-linear and strongly shaped by network topology. Optimal restoration strategies form spatially coherent restoration corridors, where removing key bottlenecks unlocks extensive upstream habitats and guides subsequent removals within the same catchments. Restoration priorities vary with budget levels, hydropower opportunity costs, and policy objectives. Incorporating hydropower opportunity costs substantially alters restoration priorities, whereas alternative barrier-hydropower linkage formulations yield broadly similar aggregate outcomes once major hydropower assets are excluded from restoration portfolios. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that restoration outcomes are influenced by alternative ecological-response formulations and parameterizations but remain primarily driven by river-network structure and dynamic connectivity processes. The results highlight the importance of integrating ecological indicators with dynamic network processes in restoration planning and provide a generalizable framework for supporting large-scale river restoration under competing environmental and economic objectives.
SN - 1470-160X
SN - 1872-7034
ER -