National survey of perinatal professionals’ experiences and approaches to conducting prebirth periviable (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) conversations: a mixed-methods study
- 1The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
- 2Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
Abstract
Background: Conducting prebirth conversations with parents facing periviable birth (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) presents numerous challenges for perinatal professionals. This mixed-methods survey aimed to gather a holistic assessment of the experiences and issues encountered by UK-based perinatal professionals in relation to periviable birth.
Methods: A voluntary, anonymous national online survey of perinatal professionals was conducted using QualtricsXM, developed with input from a parental advisory group. The survey was structured into discrete sections exploring different elements of prebirth conversations and incorporated vignette-based scenarios (22+3, 23+3, 24+3 weeks) to explore professionals’ experiences of prebirth periviable discussions, including communication, moral distress and training needs. It was distributed through relevant professional organisations across the UK between March and April 2022. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively and qualitative free-text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: The survey received 387 views with responses across the perinatal multidisciplinary team (MDT). The completed response rate varied from 100 respondents (questions related to training) to 321 (clinical vignette questions).
In contrast to national guidance, the survey showed that only two-thirds of paediatric and neonatal consultants and one-third of obstetric consultants would include comfort care within prebirth discussions with parents. Additionally, the survey demonstrated that involvement in these conversations confers a moral distress burden to perinatal professionals across the MDT.
Conclusion: Variation in management options presented to parents has the potential to limit their ability to be meaningfully involved in decisions relating to their baby. Further research is required to determine how best to train and support perinatal professionals to deliver this challenging area of care.
Related
- Digital training to support delivery of an evidence-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for heart failure: a mixed-methods evaluation of healthcare professionals' training experiences and intervention fidelity.
- Experiences towards endometriosis management: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals
- Experiences of Healthcare Professionals in Home Based-Caring for Children With Type 1-Diabetes in Vulnerable Positions: A Qualitative Study.
- Navigating failed induction of labor within maternity care systems: a qualitative study of women’s experiences and healthcare professionals’ perspectives
- Healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing care for patients with Graves’ disease: a qualitative interview study in Swedish secondary care
BibTeX
@article{peterson2026national,
title = {{National survey of perinatal professionals’ experiences and approaches to conducting prebirth periviable (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) conversations: a mixed-methods study}},
author = {Jennifer L H Peterson and Kate Delany and Edward D Johnstone and Ajit Mahaveer and Debbie M Smith},
journal = {BMJ Paediatrics Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004153},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004153},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - National survey of perinatal professionals’ experiences and approaches to conducting prebirth periviable (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) conversations: a mixed-methods study
AU - Jennifer L H Peterson
AU - Kate Delany
AU - Edward D Johnstone
AU - Ajit Mahaveer
AU - Debbie M Smith
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - BMJ Paediatrics Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004153
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004153
AB - Background: Conducting prebirth conversations with parents facing periviable birth (22+0 to 23+6 weeks) presents numerous challenges for perinatal professionals. This mixed-methods survey aimed to gather a holistic assessment of the experiences and issues encountered by UK-based perinatal professionals in relation to periviable birth. Methods: A voluntary, anonymous national online survey of perinatal professionals was conducted using QualtricsXM, developed with input from a parental advisory group. The survey was structured into discrete sections exploring different elements of prebirth conversations and incorporated vignette-based scenarios (22+3, 23+3, 24+3 weeks) to explore professionals’ experiences of prebirth periviable discussions, including communication, moral distress and training needs. It was distributed through relevant professional organisations across the UK between March and April 2022. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively and qualitative free-text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The survey received 387 views with responses across the perinatal multidisciplinary team (MDT). The completed response rate varied from 100 respondents (questions related to training) to 321 (clinical vignette questions). In contrast to national guidance, the survey showed that only two-thirds of paediatric and neonatal consultants and one-third of obstetric consultants would include comfort care within prebirth discussions with parents. Additionally, the survey demonstrated that involvement in these conversations confers a moral distress burden to perinatal professionals across the MDT. Conclusion: Variation in management options presented to parents has the potential to limit their ability to be meaningfully involved in decisions relating to their baby. Further research is required to determine how best to train and support perinatal professionals to deliver this challenging area of care.
SN - 2399-9772
ER -