Promotion of Tanning Behaviors on Instagram: Content Analysis.
- 1Department of Health, Administration, Research, and Technology, Lehman College, 250 Bedford Park Blvd W, Bronx, NY, 10468-1588, United States, 1 347-699-6505.
- 2Department of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College of Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
- 3Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, United States.
Abstract
Background
Adolescents and young adults may be particularly susceptible to social media content that promotes tanning and appearance-based beauty standards.Objective
This study examined the characteristics and messaging of pro- and antitanning Instagram posts and the extent to which they promoted health damaging- or health enhancing-behaviors.Methods
A cross-sectional content analysis of 100 Instagram posts using the hashtag #tanning assessed creator characteristics, tanning practices, commercial promotion, tanning-related messaging, beauty standards, and health risks and benefits. χ² and Fisher exact tests were used to determine differences between pro vs anti stances for categorical and dichotomous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables.Results
Most videos were protanning (79/100). Protanning videos were significantly greater than antitanning videos to have been posted in 2026 (77.2% vs 47.6%; P=.02), feature teen and young adult creators (87.3% vs 52.4%; P<.001), and include shopping tags promoting tanning products (30.4% vs 0%; P<.001). Overall, messaging focused on promoting tanning (76%) and advocating for tanned skin as a standard of beauty (63%) and downplayed the use of sun protection (11%) and the risks associated with tanning (20%). Messaging varied significantly by tanning stance, with antitanning videos focused on sun protection and health risk.Conclusions
Findings indicate an urgent need for clinicians to lead content creation on popular social media platforms to counter the health-damaging effects of unreliable, incomplete, and potentially misdirected information that is posted under popularized hashtags.
Related
- Background to the Intention to Photo-Post Food on Instagram: Potential Implications for Digital Food Marketing and Promotion of Healthy Eating
- Quality and accuracy of complementary feeding information on Instagram: A cross-sectional content analysis study
- Content Analysis of School Textbooks for Oral Health Promotion Information, among Six States/Union Territories of North India: A Mixed-method Study
- Health literacy as an indirect pathway in the association between health promotion behaviors and social network addiction symptoms among adolescents.
- An investigation of lifestyle behaviors, mental well-being, and work-related outcomes among female teachers: mixed-methods evidence for occupational health promotion
BibTeX
@article{gonzalez2026promotion,
title = {{Promotion of Tanning Behaviors on Instagram: Content Analysis.}},
author = {Tailisha Gonzalez and Grace C Hillyer and Bailey Gold and Corey H Basch},
journal = {JMIR dermatology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/110157},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42962080},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Promotion of Tanning Behaviors on Instagram: Content Analysis.
AU - Tailisha Gonzalez
AU - Grace C Hillyer
AU - Bailey Gold
AU - Corey H Basch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - JMIR dermatology
DO - 10.2196/110157
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42962080
AB - Background Adolescents and young adults may be particularly susceptible to social media content that promotes tanning and appearance-based beauty standards.Objective This study examined the characteristics and messaging of pro- and antitanning Instagram posts and the extent to which they promoted health damaging- or health enhancing-behaviors.Methods A cross-sectional content analysis of 100 Instagram posts using the hashtag #tanning assessed creator characteristics, tanning practices, commercial promotion, tanning-related messaging, beauty standards, and health risks and benefits. χ² and Fisher exact tests were used to determine differences between pro vs anti stances for categorical and dichotomous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables.Results Most videos were protanning (79/100). Protanning videos were significantly greater than antitanning videos to have been posted in 2026 (77.2% vs 47.6%; P=.02), feature teen and young adult creators (87.3% vs 52.4%; P<.001), and include shopping tags promoting tanning products (30.4% vs 0%; P<.001). Overall, messaging focused on promoting tanning (76%) and advocating for tanned skin as a standard of beauty (63%) and downplayed the use of sun protection (11%) and the risks associated with tanning (20%). Messaging varied significantly by tanning stance, with antitanning videos focused on sun protection and health risk.Conclusions Findings indicate an urgent need for clinicians to lead content creation on popular social media platforms to counter the health-damaging effects of unreliable, incomplete, and potentially misdirected information that is posted under popularized hashtags.
SN - 2562-0959
ER -