Does (co-)variation between boldness and growth differ between sexes? A nuanced and powerful evaluation of the pace of life hypothesis.
- 1School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.
- 2School of Science, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
Abstract
A major goal of behavioral ecology is identifying sources of among-individual variation in behavior. Theory suggests that life history traits and personality should be correlated at the individual level, but despite much attention, it has little support. A potentially crucial aspect influencing life history and personality associations that has been overlooked is sex. Males and females of many species differ in energy requirements, energy allocation, and behavior, suggesting that sex may affect correlations between life history and personality differently; if so, not accounting for sex differences may obscure relationships. We address this possibility by intensive longitudinal sampling of boldness and growth in 66 male and 92 female pillbugs (Armadillidium vulgare) (total N = 158) using novel statistical methods to estimate sex-specific (co-)variances in a single parsimonious model. We found that females and males had similar mean boldness, similar among-individual variation in boldness and in growth rate, but females grew faster than males. We found support for a positive correlation between boldness and growth in males but no correlation in females. Differences in personality-life-history correlations between females and males may be linked to sex-specific reproductive strategies. Given the ubiquity of sex differences in life history and behavior, this sex-specific approach to studying trait integration is likely to provide novel insights in many systems that may have gone unnoticed.
Related
- Averaging in gene perturbation benchmarks hides perturbation-strength variation: Consequences for model evaluation
- Characterization of the knock-in AppSAA mouse model as a powerful tool for Alzheimer's disease preclinical research.
- Dissection of quality variation and hierarchical quality evaluation of Evodiae Fructus under multidimensional factors
- A hybrid supervised learning model for the classification of a low-volume EEG dataset employing powerful ensembles
- Text guidance is powerful but prompt-sensitive for weakly-supervised leaf symptom segmentation
BibTeX
@article{joynson2026does,
title = {{Does (co-)variation between boldness and growth differ between sexes? A nuanced and powerful evaluation of the pace of life hypothesis.}},
author = {Aidan M Joynson and Christa Beckmann and Peter A Biro},
journal = {Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/beheco/arag116},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909888},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Does (co-)variation between boldness and growth differ between sexes? A nuanced and powerful evaluation of the pace of life hypothesis.
AU - Aidan M Joynson
AU - Christa Beckmann
AU - Peter A Biro
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
DO - 10.1093/beheco/arag116
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909888
AB - A major goal of behavioral ecology is identifying sources of among-individual variation in behavior. Theory suggests that life history traits and personality should be correlated at the individual level, but despite much attention, it has little support. A potentially crucial aspect influencing life history and personality associations that has been overlooked is sex. Males and females of many species differ in energy requirements, energy allocation, and behavior, suggesting that sex may affect correlations between life history and personality differently; if so, not accounting for sex differences may obscure relationships. We address this possibility by intensive longitudinal sampling of boldness and growth in 66 male and 92 female pillbugs (Armadillidium vulgare) (total N = 158) using novel statistical methods to estimate sex-specific (co-)variances in a single parsimonious model. We found that females and males had similar mean boldness, similar among-individual variation in boldness and in growth rate, but females grew faster than males. We found support for a positive correlation between boldness and growth in males but no correlation in females. Differences in personality-life-history correlations between females and males may be linked to sex-specific reproductive strategies. Given the ubiquity of sex differences in life history and behavior, this sex-specific approach to studying trait integration is likely to provide novel insights in many systems that may have gone unnoticed.
SN - 1045-2249
SN - 1465-7279
ER -