Barriers to Routine Use of Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Blocks in High and Low-Resource Emergency Departments
- 1Emergency Medicine, Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, USA
- 2Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, MWI
- 3Anesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, MWI
Abstract
Background
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, such as fascia iliaca (FI) blocks, represents an alternative pain management strategy with decreased risk of oversedation and respiratory depression for emergency department patients.
Methodology
This is a two-site, descriptive, 12-month follow-up survey to evaluate FI block uptake and perceived barriers after training resident physicians at two academic training sites: an urban academic tertiary center in the United States and a resource-limited referral hospital in Malawi.
Results
In total, 34 participants from the US site and seven participants from the Malawi site completed the survey, with response rates of 87% and 28%, respectively. Nearly all participants agreed that FI blocks were useful and improved patient care (median = 4 on a five-point Likert scale), and the majority reported confidence in performing the procedure. Despite this, most participants had not performed an FI block in the preceding 12 months (62% US participants and 57% Malawian participants). Perceived barriers were rated with “time to perform the procedure” ranking the highest among US participants and “time to perform the procedure” and “patient disinterest/refusal” ranking the highest for Malawian participants. Lack of equipment or supervision was commonly noted as a reason Malawian participants had considered but not performed an FI block, but not for US participants. Patient comorbidities (25%) and orthopedic reluctance (20%) were reasons US participants had considered but not performed the procedure, but were not noted by Malawian participants.
Conclusions
Reported barriers varied according to location, and the findings suggest that barriers are multifactorial and highly context-dependent.
Related
- Are Emergency Departments becoming inaccessible for vulnerable groups of patients? A retrospective cohort study
- Changing Patterns of Transient Ischemic Attack Evaluation in US Emergency Departments
- Impact evaluation of Lean Healthcare in emergency departments: evidence from a large-scale Brazilian initiative using difference-in-differences
- Prevalence of Professional Interpreter Use in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
- Hepatitis C screening strategies and linkage-to-care approaches in U.S. emergency departments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{brown2026barriers,
title = {{Barriers to Routine Use of Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Blocks in High and Low-Resource Emergency Departments}},
author = {Heather A Brown and Caroline Brady and Halley Alberts and Limbani Mapata and Singatiya Chikumbanje and Laura Nolting},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.117410},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728419},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Barriers to Routine Use of Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Blocks in High and Low-Resource Emergency Departments
AU - Heather A Brown
AU - Caroline Brady
AU - Halley Alberts
AU - Limbani Mapata
AU - Singatiya Chikumbanje
AU - Laura Nolting
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/03
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.117410
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728419
AB - Background Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, such as fascia iliaca (FI) blocks, represents an alternative pain management strategy with decreased risk of oversedation and respiratory depression for emergency department patients. Methodology This is a two-site, descriptive, 12-month follow-up survey to evaluate FI block uptake and perceived barriers after training resident physicians at two academic training sites: an urban academic tertiary center in the United States and a resource-limited referral hospital in Malawi. Results In total, 34 participants from the US site and seven participants from the Malawi site completed the survey, with response rates of 87% and 28%, respectively. Nearly all participants agreed that FI blocks were useful and improved patient care (median = 4 on a five-point Likert scale), and the majority reported confidence in performing the procedure. Despite this, most participants had not performed an FI block in the preceding 12 months (62% US participants and 57% Malawian participants). Perceived barriers were rated with “time to perform the procedure” ranking the highest among US participants and “time to perform the procedure” and “patient disinterest/refusal” ranking the highest for Malawian participants. Lack of equipment or supervision was commonly noted as a reason Malawian participants had considered but not performed an FI block, but not for US participants. Patient comorbidities (25%) and orthopedic reluctance (20%) were reasons US participants had considered but not performed the procedure, but were not noted by Malawian participants. Conclusions Reported barriers varied according to location, and the findings suggest that barriers are multifactorial and highly context-dependent.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -