Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in immunology

Patient-aware single-cell analysis of fibrovascular remodeling in a predominantly colorectal cancer immunotherapy cohort

  1. 1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ward I, Jingmen Central Hospital, Jingmen Central Hospital affiliated to Jingchu University of Technology , , ,
  2. 2Operating Room, Jingmen Central Hospital, Jingmen Central Hospital affiliated to Jingchu University of Technology , , ,

Abstract

Background: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and vascular mural cells may shape extracellular matrix organization in colorectal cancer. However, single-cell comparisons are susceptible to unequal cell recovery, ambient RNA, doublets, treatment-stage mixing, and repeated sampling within patients. We investigated fibrovascular remodeling using patients as the inferential unit and distinguished reproducible signals from donor-concentrated and context-dependent findings.

Methods: We reanalyzed a published single-cell RNA sequencing cohort of 22 patients, including 20 with colorectal cancer and 2 with duodenal carcinoma. The primary pericyte analysis included 14 pretreatment matched normal-tumor pairs with at least three pericytes per tissue. We assessed ambient contamination and doublets using DecontX and scDblFinder. CAFs were reclustered at six response-blind resolutions, and the stable parent population was tested by patient-blocked pseudobulk analysis after excluding its dominant donor. Independent CRC single-cell and spatial datasets, a cross-cancer immunotherapy cohort, and TCGA were used for external testing.

Results: After DecontX correction, tumor pericytes had higher ECM6 scores (median paired change 0.309; false discovery rate [FDR] 0.018). Scores were also higher for the matrix stiffness transcriptional proxy (0.277; FDR 0.012) and the hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptional program (0.255; FDR 0.028). All three signatures remained significant at the five-pericyte threshold (n=13). COL1A1 and FN1 increased in the analysis, although COL1A1 was borderline in the five-cell sensitivity analysis. Response-blind stability analysis identified a 2,983-cell ECM-remodeling CAF population represented in all 22 patients. After excluding P02, patient-blocked pseudobulk analysis in 15 patients showed higher matrix, inflammatory, and myCAF-related programs and a lower iCAF program. Neither SPP1 nor baseline enrichment in stable disease was supported. In GSE205506, a disjoint 10-gene fibroblast gate retained higher inflammatory and composite CAF scores in non-pCR samples. The highest-scoring unsupervised cluster was donor-concentrated and showed no patient-level association with response. Spatial and cross-cancer analyses yielded mixed or null results.

Conclusions: These results support pretreatment fibrovascular transcriptional remodeling at the patient level. They do not establish an SPP1-high response biomarker, a mechanical stiffness phenotype, or causal CAF-to-pericyte signaling. Donor-aware analysis places the rare-cluster observation within a broader, reproducible ECM-remodeling CAF program while defining its evidential limits.

Related

  1. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Colorectal Cancer: From Immune Regulation to Immunotherapy
    Xin Yang, Xiaoqin Ge, Shengping Gong +4
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. The Gut Microbiota-Immunity Axis in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy and Clinical Translation.
    Izabela Siemińska
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Bariatric surgery-induced gut microbiota remodeling and innate immune activation: implications for gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy
    Bingbing Shen, Yi Luo, Xinghong Tang +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  4. Photoimmunotherapy Meets Systemic Immunotherapy: Molecular Mechanisms, Microenvironmental Remodeling, and Combinatorial Paradigms in Solid Tumors
    Francesco Russano, Francesco Callegarin, Davide Brugnolo +8
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biochemistryCrossref
  5. NDFIP2 Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Through DDX3X‐Dependent R‐Loop Remodeling and GNG13 Transcriptional Activation
    Enjian Zhang, Yanfang Li, Jiaxin Shu +10
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{gu2026patientaware,
  title = {{Patient-aware single-cell analysis of fibrovascular remodeling in a predominantly colorectal cancer immunotherapy cohort}},
  author = {Yang Gu and Li Li and Yuxian Zhang and Jie Tang and Zhigang Wang and Xiaofeng Luo},
  journal = {Frontiers in immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1961075},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668821},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Patient-aware single-cell analysis of fibrovascular remodeling in a predominantly colorectal cancer immunotherapy cohort
AU  - Yang Gu
AU  - Li Li
AU  - Yuxian Zhang
AU  - Jie Tang
AU  - Zhigang Wang
AU  - Xiaofeng Luo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Frontiers in immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1961075
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668821
AB  - Background: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and vascular mural cells may shape extracellular matrix organization in colorectal cancer. However, single-cell comparisons are susceptible to unequal cell recovery, ambient RNA, doublets, treatment-stage mixing, and repeated sampling within patients. We investigated fibrovascular remodeling using patients as the inferential unit and distinguished reproducible signals from donor-concentrated and context-dependent findings.  Methods: We reanalyzed a published single-cell RNA sequencing cohort of 22 patients, including 20 with colorectal cancer and 2 with duodenal carcinoma. The primary pericyte analysis included 14 pretreatment matched normal-tumor pairs with at least three pericytes per tissue. We assessed ambient contamination and doublets using DecontX and scDblFinder. CAFs were reclustered at six response-blind resolutions, and the stable parent population was tested by patient-blocked pseudobulk analysis after excluding its dominant donor. Independent CRC single-cell and spatial datasets, a cross-cancer immunotherapy cohort, and TCGA were used for external testing.  Results: After DecontX correction, tumor pericytes had higher ECM6 scores (median paired change 0.309; false discovery rate [FDR] 0.018). Scores were also higher for the matrix stiffness transcriptional proxy (0.277; FDR 0.012) and the hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptional program (0.255; FDR 0.028). All three signatures remained significant at the five-pericyte threshold (n=13). COL1A1 and FN1 increased in the analysis, although COL1A1 was borderline in the five-cell sensitivity analysis. Response-blind stability analysis identified a 2,983-cell ECM-remodeling CAF population represented in all 22 patients. After excluding P02, patient-blocked pseudobulk analysis in 15 patients showed higher matrix, inflammatory, and myCAF-related programs and a lower iCAF program. Neither SPP1 nor baseline enrichment in stable disease was supported. In GSE205506, a disjoint 10-gene fibroblast gate retained higher inflammatory and composite CAF scores in non-pCR samples. The highest-scoring unsupervised cluster was donor-concentrated and showed no patient-level association with response. Spatial and cross-cancer analyses yielded mixed or null results.  Conclusions: These results support pretreatment fibrovascular transcriptional remodeling at the patient level. They do not establish an SPP1-high response biomarker, a mechanical stiffness phenotype, or causal CAF-to-pericyte signaling. Donor-aware analysis places the rare-cluster observation within a broader, reproducible ECM-remodeling CAF program while defining its evidential limits.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -