Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of an Intact Rotator Cuff: A Contemporary Review of Current Indications, Outcomes, and Surgical Considerations
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Fracisco, 1500 Owens St, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) was designed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy but is now used in patients with an intact rotator cuff, most often for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). This review examines the current evidence for rTSA in cuff-intact patients, focusing on the indications, functional outcomes, complications, implant design considerations and surgical technique.
Recent Findings: In matched cohorts and meta-analyses restricted to cuff-intact GHOA, rTSA and aTSA produce comparable pain relief, patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction, and overhead elevation. ATSA restores greater external and internal rotation, but this difference often falls below clinically important thresholds and narrows over time. RTSA generally has a lower overall complication and revision rate, with baseplate loosening as the leading though still rare reason for revision surgery. Instability, acromial and scapular spine stress fracture, and revision surgery rates are all lower when the rotator cuff is intact. Current studies on the cuff-intact population are limited to 10-year outcomes, with registry survivorship of rTSA for GHOA approximately 96.1% at 10 years.
Summary: RTSA is an efficacious and durable option for patients with glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff, providing consistent pain relief and function. Patient outcomes are influenced by surgical technique, implant design and positioning, and avoidance of complications. Long-term follow-up and further comparative studies are needed to define the role of rTSA versus aTSA in this population.
Related
- Supraspinatus management in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: current evidence and practical considerations.
- Factors associated with outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at midterm follow-up
- Long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for atraumatic humeral head avascular necrosis
- Comparing outcomes of onlay humeral stem designs in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.
- Evaluating the safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist use in non-diabetic overweight patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty
BibTeX
@article{wong2026reverse,
title = {{Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of an Intact Rotator Cuff: A Contemporary Review of Current Indications, Outcomes, and Surgical Considerations}},
author = {Liam H. Wong and Benjamin M. Lurie and Michael R. Davies},
journal = {Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1007/s12178-026-10066-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10066-3},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of an Intact Rotator Cuff: A Contemporary Review of Current Indications, Outcomes, and Surgical Considerations
AU - Liam H. Wong
AU - Benjamin M. Lurie
AU - Michael R. Davies
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
DO - 10.1007/s12178-026-10066-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10066-3
AB - Purpose of Review: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) was designed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy but is now used in patients with an intact rotator cuff, most often for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). This review examines the current evidence for rTSA in cuff-intact patients, focusing on the indications, functional outcomes, complications, implant design considerations and surgical technique. Recent Findings: In matched cohorts and meta-analyses restricted to cuff-intact GHOA, rTSA and aTSA produce comparable pain relief, patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction, and overhead elevation. ATSA restores greater external and internal rotation, but this difference often falls below clinically important thresholds and narrows over time. RTSA generally has a lower overall complication and revision rate, with baseplate loosening as the leading though still rare reason for revision surgery. Instability, acromial and scapular spine stress fracture, and revision surgery rates are all lower when the rotator cuff is intact. Current studies on the cuff-intact population are limited to 10-year outcomes, with registry survivorship of rTSA for GHOA approximately 96.1% at 10 years. Summary: RTSA is an efficacious and durable option for patients with glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff, providing consistent pain relief and function. Patient outcomes are influenced by surgical technique, implant design and positioning, and avoidance of complications. Long-term follow-up and further comparative studies are needed to define the role of rTSA versus aTSA in this population.
SN - 1935-973X
SN - 1935-9748
ER -