Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Precision Sum Rule for Nucleon Isovector Polarizabilities and the Proton-Neutron Mass Difference

Abstract

The precision of the electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference δmQED extracted from the Cottingham formula hinges on a subtraction function whose low-energy normalization S̅(0) is fixed by the isovector combination of the proton and neutron polarizabilities, (αE1−βM1)p−n. We derive a dispersive sum rule for this combination in terms of s-channel photoabsorption cross sections and the product of t-channel γγ→πη/KK̅It=1 and πη/KK̅It=1→ NN̅ amplitudes, without invoking Reggeon dominance. Combining empirical pion-photoproduction multipoles with coupled-channel Muskhelishvili-Omnès representations of the scalar-isovector πη/KK̅ amplitudes, we obtain (αE1−βM1)p−n=−0.82(33)×10−4 fm3, fixing its sign and reducing the uncertainty by one order of magnitude compared with the previously known value. This result yields S̅(0)=−0.56(28) GeV−2, leading to δmQED=0.75+0.02−0.04 MeV, substantially more precise than previous Cottingham determinations. The negative S̅(0) also provides a low-energy test of Reggeon dominance in the subtraction function.

Related

  1. Nucleon polarizabilities revisited: insights from the Bernabéu-Ericson-Ferro Fontan-Tarrach sum rule
    Xiong-Hui Cao, Ling-Yun Dai, Feng-Kun Guo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsNuclear physicsarXiv
  2. New Neutron Polarizabilities from Deuterium Compton Scattering at HIγS
    D. Godagama, M. W. Ahmed, B. Crowe +19
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNuclear physicsarXiv
  3. Probing the Size of Neutron and Proton Single-Particle Orbitals from Nucleon Knockout Reactions
    M Enciu, A Obertelli, P Doornenbal +83
    HALPreprintLicence not statedNuclear physicsHAL
  4. Statistical Analysis of Neutron Star Cooling: Implications for the Nuclear Equation of State and Nucleon Pairing
    Afonso Ávila, Ricardo Z. Ferreira, Violetta Sagun
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. On the Nucleon Effective Mass in Neutron Stars Cooling
    Yuuki Sugiyama, Akira Dohi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{cao2026precision,
  title = {{Precision Sum Rule for Nucleon Isovector Polarizabilities and the Proton-Neutron Mass Difference}},
  author = {Xiong-Hui Cao and Ling-Yun Dai and Feng-Kun Guo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.15154},
  eprint = {2609.15154},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15154},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Precision Sum Rule for Nucleon Isovector Polarizabilities and the Proton-Neutron Mass Difference
AU  - Xiong-Hui Cao
AU  - Ling-Yun Dai
AU  - Feng-Kun Guo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.15154
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15154
AB  - The precision of the electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference δm_QED extracted from the Cottingham formula hinges on a subtraction function whose low-energy normalization S̅(0) is fixed by the isovector combination of the proton and neutron polarizabilities, (α_E1−β_M1)^p−n. We derive a dispersive sum rule for this combination in terms of s-channel photoabsorption cross sections and the product of t-channel γγ→πη/KK̅_I_t=1 and πη/KK̅_I_t=1→ NN̅ amplitudes, without invoking Reggeon dominance. Combining empirical pion-photoproduction multipoles with coupled-channel Muskhelishvili-Omnès representations of the scalar-isovector πη/KK̅ amplitudes, we obtain (α_E1−β_M1)^p−n=−0.82(33)×10^−4 fm^3, fixing its sign and reducing the uncertainty by one order of magnitude compared with the previously known value. This result yields S̅(0)=−0.56(28) GeV^−2, leading to δm_QED=0.75^+0.02_−0.04 MeV, substantially more precise than previous Cottingham determinations. The negative S̅(0) also provides a low-energy test of Reggeon dominance in the subtraction function.
ER  -