Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Agronomic drivers of Tribenuron-methyl resistance in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) in dryland wheat fields of western Iran

  1. 1Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Understanding the impact of common agronomic practices on the evolution of herbicide resistance is essential for developing sustainable weed management strategies that incorporate non-chemical control methods. In this study, we investigated the frequency of Tribenuron-methyl (TBM) reduced-sensitivity in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) by analyzing survival patterns and their association with agronomic management across 313 dryland wheat fields in the Eslamabad-e-Gharb district, Kermanshah, Iran. The results showed that survival levels in the studied fields varied notably, with 47.3% exhibiting survival between 0% and 20%, 14.0% falling within the 20% to 30% range, and 38.7% showing survival above 30%, highlighting the diverse survival patterns across the region. Logistic regression analysis identified intensive TBM application as the strongest factor promoting survival proportion, with triennial applications (3×) over a five-year period increasing the risk of reduced-sensitivity in wild mustard more than tenfold (Exp(B)=10.651) compared to no use. The selection of wheat cultivar also played a significant role; using Azar-2 raised the survival by more than twofold (Exp(B)=2.218) relative to Sardari. Furthermore, field area significantly influenced survival dynamics, with larger farms (15 ha and more) showing higher mean survival proportions (42.1%) and greater frequencies of intensive TBM application. Conversely, incorporating chickpea into the crop rotation significantly reduced survival proportions. These findings highlight the necessity of adopting diversified agronomic practices—including herbicide rotation, crop rotation, and competitive cultivar selection—to mitigate herbicide resistance frequency. Furthermore, strengthening grower awareness regarding resistance mechanisms and improving the outreach of effective management protocols are critical.

Related

  1. Integrated strategies for improving lodging resistance in wheat: physiological mechanisms, plant growth regulators and agronomic management
    Kavita Devi, Jasdev Singh Deol, Amit Kaul +2
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Multi-trait selection of tropical maize hybrids for combined productivity, agronomic stability, and aflatoxin resistance
    Victor Adelodun Diekade, Ayodeji Abe, Mamadou Mboup +6
    Frontiers in plant sciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Benchmarking long-read RNA sequencing for de novo transcriptome assembly in non-model plant species: insights from Moricandia arvensis
    S. Sharma, M. Hackenberg, L. Navarro +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. Effects of a community-based intervention bundle on household transmission of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in rural Burkina Faso to target community-level drivers of antimicrobial resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a cluster-randomised trial
    Raneem Aizouk, Yougbaré Sibidou, Daniel Valia +32
    The Lancet MicrobePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. Metabolomic assessment of nitrogen mustard and 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide effects on human dermal fibroblast cell line
    Erdim Sertoglu, Omer Faruk Kirlangic, Mesut Ortatli +6
    CytotechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPlant biologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{moradi2026agronomic,
  title = {{Agronomic drivers of Tribenuron-methyl resistance in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) in dryland wheat fields of western Iran}},
  author = {Fattah Moradi and Alireza Bagheri and Farzad Mondani and Iraj Nosratti},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358794},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358794},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Agronomic drivers of Tribenuron-methyl resistance in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) in dryland wheat fields of western Iran
AU  - Fattah Moradi
AU  - Alireza Bagheri
AU  - Farzad Mondani
AU  - Iraj Nosratti
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358794
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358794
AB  - Understanding the impact of common agronomic practices on the evolution of herbicide resistance is essential for developing sustainable weed management strategies that incorporate non-chemical control methods. In this study, we investigated the frequency of Tribenuron-methyl (TBM) reduced-sensitivity in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) by analyzing survival patterns and their association with agronomic management across 313 dryland wheat fields in the Eslamabad-e-Gharb district, Kermanshah, Iran. The results showed that survival levels in the studied fields varied notably, with 47.3% exhibiting survival between 0% and 20%, 14.0% falling within the 20% to 30% range, and 38.7% showing survival above 30%, highlighting the diverse survival patterns across the region. Logistic regression analysis identified intensive TBM application as the strongest factor promoting survival proportion, with triennial applications (3×) over a five-year period increasing the risk of reduced-sensitivity in wild mustard more than tenfold (Exp(B)=10.651) compared to no use. The selection of wheat cultivar also played a significant role; using Azar-2 raised the survival by more than twofold (Exp(B)=2.218) relative to Sardari. Furthermore, field area significantly influenced survival dynamics, with larger farms (15 ha and more) showing higher mean survival proportions (42.1%) and greater frequencies of intensive TBM application. Conversely, incorporating chickpea into the crop rotation significantly reduced survival proportions. These findings highlight the necessity of adopting diversified agronomic practices—including herbicide rotation, crop rotation, and competitive cultivar selection—to mitigate herbicide resistance frequency. Furthermore, strengthening grower awareness regarding resistance mechanisms and improving the outreach of effective management protocols are critical.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -