Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Psychiatry

The association between cognitive disengagement syndrome and language in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University
  2. 2Research Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital
  3. 3Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen
  4. 4Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University
  5. 5Department of Culture and Communication, Aalborg University
  6. 6Department of Psychology, Agder University

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to explore the association between cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) and three aspects of language (narrative coherence, core language, and pragmatic language) in children with ADHD, and to examine whether these associations differ from those observed in neurotypical children.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, parents completed questionnaires about their child’s CDS and pragmatic language, while children with ADHD (n = 45) and neurotypical children (n = 38), aged 7–11 years, completed tasks of narrative coherence and core language.

Results: CDS, after adjusting for age and sex, was significantly associated with pragmatic language in children with ADHD with a large effect ( β = -0.51, p = .001), while CDS was significantly associated with core language in neurotypical children with a medium effect ( β = -0.34, p = .04). There was a significant group difference in the association between CDS and pragmatic language (χ²(1) = 4.44, p = .04), with a stronger association in the ADHD group. After performing sensitivity analyses including inattention as an additional covariate, the associations ceased to be significant in both groups and there were no longer significant between-group differences.

Conclusion: This study examined the association between CDS and language in children with and without ADHD. The findings suggest that there may be an association between CDS and pragmatic language in children with ADHD. However, sensitivity analyses including inattention as a covariate suggest that this association may largely reflect variance shared with inattention. Consequently, the association between CDS and language may partly reflect their shared association with ADHD symptoms. As this, to our knowledge, is the first study to investigate language in relation to CDS in children with ADHD, further research is warranted.

Related

  1. Attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder polygenic risk score and incidence of cognitive impairment in older adults: A prospective multicohort study
    Douglas Teixeira Leffa, Guilherme Bauer‐Negrini, Livia Amaral +12
    Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. The Efficacy of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Reducing Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Impairment in Indian University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dr Kadim Lovakumari, Prof Tosendra Dwivedi
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Screen time and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caihong Zhao, Jing Xu, Xirui Wu +1
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and odds of subsequent multiple sclerosis: a population-based retrospective case–control study
    Yuval M. Eshel, Dana Hadar, Hilla Cohen +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Interpretable attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis from functional magnetic resonance imaging via hybrid convolutional neural network–transformer learning and multi-level graph-based comprehensibility
    R. Harini, O. Uma Maheswari, K. Lakshmi Priya
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{jepsen2026association,
  title = {{The association between cognitive disengagement syndrome and language in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder}},
  author = {Ida Jepsen and Cecilia Brynskov and Charlotte Ulrikka Rask and Kristine Jensen de López and Per Hove Thomsen and Rikke Lambek},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1965712},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1965712/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The association between cognitive disengagement syndrome and language in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
AU  - Ida Jepsen
AU  - Cecilia Brynskov
AU  - Charlotte Ulrikka Rask
AU  - Kristine Jensen de López
AU  - Per Hove Thomsen
AU  - Rikke Lambek
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1965712
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1965712/full
AB  - Aim: This study aims to explore the association between cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) and three aspects of language (narrative coherence, core language, and pragmatic language) in children with ADHD, and to examine whether these associations differ from those observed in neurotypical children.  Methods: In this cross-sectional study, parents completed questionnaires about their child’s CDS and pragmatic language, while children with ADHD (n = 45) and neurotypical children (n = 38), aged 7–11 years, completed tasks of narrative coherence and core language.  Results: CDS, after adjusting for age and sex, was significantly associated with pragmatic language in children with ADHD with a large effect ( β = -0.51, p = .001), while CDS was significantly associated with core language in neurotypical children with a medium effect ( β = -0.34, p = .04). There was a significant group difference in the association between CDS and pragmatic language (χ²(1) = 4.44, p = .04), with a stronger association in the ADHD group. After performing sensitivity analyses including inattention as an additional covariate, the associations ceased to be significant in both groups and there were no longer significant between-group differences.  Conclusion: This study examined the association between CDS and language in children with and without ADHD. The findings suggest that there may be an association between CDS and pragmatic language in children with ADHD. However, sensitivity analyses including inattention as a covariate suggest that this association may largely reflect variance shared with inattention. Consequently, the association between CDS and language may partly reflect their shared association with ADHD symptoms. As this, to our knowledge, is the first study to investigate language in relation to CDS in children with ADHD, further research is warranted.
SN  - 1664-0640
ER  -