Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Nonexistence of a Strongly Regular Graph with Parameters (266,45,0,9): A Certificate-Free Lean Proof

Abstract

We prove that no strongly regular graph with parameters $(266, 45, 0, 9)$ exists. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and Mathlib without external infeasibility certificates or assumed classification theorems. A hypothetical graph gives a rank-$12$ integral Gram lattice with an integral centroid. A Lorentzian change of form, a marked D7 gluing, and an explicit rank-six complement produce a positive-definite even unimodular lattice of rank $24$, together with the original indexed family of $220$ vectors. Harmonic theta identities and a root-isolation inequality force the root system A11 ⊥ D7 ⊥ E6. First and second moments then exclude the possible complements: the final case reduces to an impossible binary projection identity 4x + 4y − 2z = 50. A type-A subcase is closed by a separate classification-free proof of the known nonexistence of a quasi-symmetric $2−(56, 12, 9)$ design with intersections $0, 3$. That argument constructs a Krein graph and forces a Steiner $3−(12, 4, 1)$ design, contradicting its replication equation. The formal theorem depends only on the three standard Lean axioms and has also been checked independently with nanoda. The archived formalization is release v2.0.0.

Related

  1. Nonexistence of strongly regular graphs via multipoint spherical semidefinite bounds
    Zhen-Qi Liao, Wei-Hsuan Yu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Nonexistence of Strongly Regular Graphs via Gegenbauer Positivity and SRG Counting
    Zhen-Qi Liao, Jiaxin Wang, Wei-Hsuan Yu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Coherent configuration on 3-uniform hypergraph over strongly regular graph
    Fajri Maulana
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. An Induced Subgraph Paradigm for Strongly Regular Graph Constructions
    Benjamin Baker
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Strongly regular graph, strongly polynomial sequences, and two-level polynomials
    Tristram Bogart, Santiago Jiménez-Salazar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{akiyama2026nonexistence,
  title = {{Nonexistence of a Strongly Regular Graph with Parameters (266,45,0,9): A Certificate-Free Lean Proof}},
  author = {Kay Akiyama},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.08319},
  eprint = {2609.08319},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08319},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Nonexistence of a Strongly Regular Graph with Parameters (266,45,0,9): A Certificate-Free Lean Proof
AU  - Kay Akiyama
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.08319
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08319
AB  - We prove that no strongly regular graph with parameters $(266, 45, 0, 9)$ exists. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and Mathlib without external infeasibility certificates or assumed classification theorems. A hypothetical graph gives a rank-$12$ integral Gram lattice with an integral centroid. A Lorentzian change of form, a marked D_7 gluing, and an explicit rank-six complement produce a positive-definite even unimodular lattice of rank $24$, together with the original indexed family of $220$ vectors. Harmonic theta identities and a root-isolation inequality force the root system A_11 ⊥ D_7 ⊥ E_6. First and second moments then exclude the possible complements: the final case reduces to an impossible binary projection identity 4x + 4y − 2z = 50. A type-A subcase is closed by a separate classification-free proof of the known nonexistence of a quasi-symmetric $2−(56, 12, 9)$ design with intersections $0, 3$. That argument constructs a Krein graph and forces a Steiner $3−(12, 4, 1)$ design, contradicting its replication equation. The formal theorem depends only on the three standard Lean axioms and has also been checked independently with nanoda. The archived formalization is release v2.0.0.
ER  -