Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCJournal of inflammation research

Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease with Clinical and Biomarker Data.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, People's Republic of China.
  2. 2Kaifeng Key Laboratory for Modulation and Rehabilitation of Cardiac Function, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, People's Republic of China.
  3. 3Department of Cardiology, Zhoukou Central Hospital, Zhoukou Medical Science Research Center, Zhoukou, Henan, 466000, People's Republic of China.
  4. 4Institute on Aging and Disease, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Purpose

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common condition associated with high disability and mortality. Although coronary angiography (CAG) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, its accessibility is limited in medically underserved regions or for patients who are ineligible for the procedure. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model using machine learning algorithms that integrate clinical data and plasma biomarkers for timely and noninvasive CHD diagnosis.Patients and methods

A total of 191 patients who underwent CAG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University between March and October 2023, comprising 151 CHD patients and 40 non-CHD controls, were included. Clinical data and plasma samples were collected; the levels of eight biomarkers (LPA, MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-1β, NRG4, S100A8/A9, HMGB1, and cfDNA) were measured by ELISAs and fluorescence spectrophotometry. The dataset was split into training, test, and validation sets (8:1:1) and standardized. After the SMOTE was applied to the training set, key features were selected via recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV). Six machine learning algorithms were used to construct the models, and their performance was evaluated on the test set and via 10-fold cross-validation. SHAP was used to interpret the optimal model.Results

Eight important features were identified. Among the six models, the KNN model performed best on the test set, achieving an AUROC of 80.7%, accuracy of 82.7%, F1‑score of 89.5%, precision of 86.4%, and sensitivity of 92.7%.Conclusion

A machine learning model integrating clinical and plasma biomarker data has potential for predicting CHD in patients who present with chest discomfort, offering a potential diagnostic aid when CAG is not readily accessible, pending validation in larger, multicenter studies. However, these findings are based on a single-center cohort of 191 patients and require external validation in larger, multicenter populations.

Related

  1. PLA2G2A is a candidate biomarker for sepsis diagnosis in mice through machine learning algorithms
    Hong Zhu, Pai Peng, Shiquan Han +1
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Machine learning for biomarker-driven thalassemia diagnosis: a framework for causal effect estimation
    Nora ElRashidy, M. A. Elsabagh, Esraa Hassan +6
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHuman geneticsDOAJ
  3. A novel three-CpG signature for lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis: integrating multi-omics, machine learning, and clinical validation
    Qianying Liu, Maoting Shen, Lirui Yan +8
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Machine learning-based prediction of clinical outcomes and left ventricular ejection fraction improvement after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced ejection fraction.
    Lioz Steinbuch, Edward Itelman, Yuval Altman +11
    European heart journal. Digital healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. Integrative Multi-Omics and Machine Learning Unveil Plakophilin 1 as a Robust Diagnostic Biomarker for Thymoma
    Yunhan Li, Shen Zhang, Qian Gao +8
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026machine,
  title = {{Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease with Clinical and Biomarker Data.}},
  author = {Zhengwei Zhang and Ang Zhao and Yutian Mi and Yu Qiao and Shuangyang Xue and Fuwei Zhang and Jingmin Yang and Zhiming Song},
  journal = {Journal of inflammation research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/jir.s615123},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948381},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease with Clinical and Biomarker Data.
AU  - Zhengwei Zhang
AU  - Ang Zhao
AU  - Yutian Mi
AU  - Yu Qiao
AU  - Shuangyang Xue
AU  - Fuwei Zhang
AU  - Jingmin Yang
AU  - Zhiming Song
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Journal of inflammation research
DO  - 10.2147/jir.s615123
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948381
AB  - Purpose  Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common condition associated with high disability and mortality. Although coronary angiography (CAG) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, its accessibility is limited in medically underserved regions or for patients who are ineligible for the procedure. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model using machine learning algorithms that integrate clinical data and plasma biomarkers for timely and noninvasive CHD diagnosis.Patients and methods  A total of 191 patients who underwent CAG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University between March and October 2023, comprising 151 CHD patients and 40 non-CHD controls, were included. Clinical data and plasma samples were collected; the levels of eight biomarkers (LPA, MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-1β, NRG4, S100A8/A9, HMGB1, and cfDNA) were measured by ELISAs and fluorescence spectrophotometry. The dataset was split into training, test, and validation sets (8:1:1) and standardized. After the SMOTE was applied to the training set, key features were selected via recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV). Six machine learning algorithms were used to construct the models, and their performance was evaluated on the test set and via 10-fold cross-validation. SHAP was used to interpret the optimal model.Results  Eight important features were identified. Among the six models, the KNN model performed best on the test set, achieving an AUROC of 80.7%, accuracy of 82.7%, F1‑score of 89.5%, precision of 86.4%, and sensitivity of 92.7%.Conclusion  A machine learning model integrating clinical and plasma biomarker data has potential for predicting CHD in patients who present with chest discomfort, offering a potential diagnostic aid when CAG is not readily accessible, pending validation in larger, multicenter studies. However, these findings are based on a single-center cohort of 191 patients and require external validation in larger, multicenter populations.
SN  - 1178-7031
ER  -