Survival economics and criminalization among women who use drugs during COVID-19 and de facto drug decriminalization in Baltimore, Maryland.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Medicine Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
- 2Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, Rochester, NY, USA.
- 3Department of Health, Behavior, & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- 4Department of Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
Background
Women who use drugs (WWUD) often experience social and economic marginalization. Many rely on survival economies that span formal, informal, and illicit income-generating activities, which may increase exposure to the criminal legal system. This study identified exploratory patterns of survival economic strategies among WWUD, then examined associations between income activities and criminal legal exposures during Baltimore, Maryland's COVID-19 emergency period and de facto drug decriminalization.Methods
Data come from the baseline assessment a WWUD cohort (n = 227) in Baltimore, recruited from August 2021 to December 2022. Guided by a sociological framework of income sources among low-income women, latent class analysis was used to identify survival economics across state support, instrumental support (money from family, friends, partners), informal labor, and illicit work (selling drugs, sex work). We then assessed associations between two common income sources (illicit and state support) and criminal legal exposures using Poisson regression with robust variance.Results
Three distinct survival economic strategies emerged: mixed and diverse income (57% of sample), primarily state supported (27%), and primarily illicit (15%). Arrest prevalence did not differ across income activities. However, WWUD reporting illicit income compared to not were significantly more likely to report police encounters (adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) 1.61 95% CI 1.39, 2.01), including abusive ones, although borderline significant (aPR 1.33 95% CI 1.02,1.74).Conclusions
WWUD engaged in diverse survival economic strategies and illicit income generation was associated with police contact. Although these findings are exploratory, they highlight the importance of clarifying how criminalized survival economies are policed.
Related
- An Epidemiological Study of the Impact of Doula Care on Black Birth Outcomes in Baltimore, Maryland
- Substance Use and Violent Injury Among Black Men in Baltimore, Maryland: A Qualitative Study
- The Escalating Cost of Disinvestment in the Health of Transgender Youths—From Research Retrenchment to the Criminalization of Care
- Lived experiences and occupational pressures among Vietnamese nail salon workers in Maryland
- The symbolic power of decriminalization and recriminalization in shaping stigma toward people who use drugs in British Columbia.
BibTeX
@article{flath2026survival,
title = {{Survival economics and criminalization among women who use drugs during COVID-19 and de facto drug decriminalization in Baltimore, Maryland.}},
author = {Natalie Flath and Tali Ziv and Catherine Tomko and Saba Rouhani and Laura Nicole Sisson and Susan G Sherman},
journal = {Drug and alcohol dependence reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.dadr.2026.100484},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927025},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Survival economics and criminalization among women who use drugs during COVID-19 and de facto drug decriminalization in Baltimore, Maryland.
AU - Natalie Flath
AU - Tali Ziv
AU - Catherine Tomko
AU - Saba Rouhani
AU - Laura Nicole Sisson
AU - Susan G Sherman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Drug and alcohol dependence reports
DO - 10.1016/j.dadr.2026.100484
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927025
AB - Background Women who use drugs (WWUD) often experience social and economic marginalization. Many rely on survival economies that span formal, informal, and illicit income-generating activities, which may increase exposure to the criminal legal system. This study identified exploratory patterns of survival economic strategies among WWUD, then examined associations between income activities and criminal legal exposures during Baltimore, Maryland's COVID-19 emergency period and de facto drug decriminalization.Methods Data come from the baseline assessment a WWUD cohort (n = 227) in Baltimore, recruited from August 2021 to December 2022. Guided by a sociological framework of income sources among low-income women, latent class analysis was used to identify survival economics across state support, instrumental support (money from family, friends, partners), informal labor, and illicit work (selling drugs, sex work). We then assessed associations between two common income sources (illicit and state support) and criminal legal exposures using Poisson regression with robust variance.Results Three distinct survival economic strategies emerged: mixed and diverse income (57% of sample), primarily state supported (27%), and primarily illicit (15%). Arrest prevalence did not differ across income activities. However, WWUD reporting illicit income compared to not were significantly more likely to report police encounters (adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) 1.61 95% CI 1.39, 2.01), including abusive ones, although borderline significant (aPR 1.33 95% CI 1.02,1.74).Conclusions WWUD engaged in diverse survival economic strategies and illicit income generation was associated with police contact. Although these findings are exploratory, they highlight the importance of clarifying how criminalized survival economies are policed.
SN - 2772-7246
ER -