Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after lung resection in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 1Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
- 2College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Introduction
Lung resection is the standard curative treatment for resectable lung cancer; however, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) remain major barriers to recovery and healthcare efficiency. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation are distinct perioperative strategies that differ in their timing, intervention components, and mechanisms of action, but both aim to optimize patients' perioperative condition and improve postoperative recovery. However, their effectiveness compared with conventional perioperative care based solely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been comprehensively synthesized.Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of ERAS and prehabilitation in reducing PPCs, shortening LOS, and improving patient-reported outcomes following pulmonary resection for lung cancer.Subjects and methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving adults undergoing pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, RISS, KISS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identified studies published between January 2015 and May 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for PPCs and mean differences (MDs) for LOS. Patient-reported outcomes were synthesized narratively according to the SWiM guideline.Results
Ten RCTs involving 1,569 participants met the inclusion criteria. ERAS and prehabilitation significantly reduced PPCs compared with conventional perioperative care (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.36-0.65, p < 0.001). The exploratory pooled analysis suggested a shorter postoperative LOS (MD = -2.30 days, 95% CI = -3.58 to -1.01); however, heterogeneity was considerable (I ² = 97.9%), and the 95% prediction interval crossed the null. Narrative synthesis demonstrated consistent improvements in anxiety, depression, postoperative pain, pulmonary function, quality of life, and functional recovery.Conclusion
ERAS and prehabilitation are effective perioperative strategies for improving outcomes after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Their implementation in routine clinical practice may reduce postoperative complications, accelerate recovery, and improve healthcare efficiency. Further multicenter RCTs are needed to optimize intervention components, standardize outcome measures, and strengthen evidence for long-term and patient-reported outcomes.Systematic review registration
CRD420261373242.
Related
- Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury or myocardial injury after liver resection: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- The Effect of Perioperative Video Interventions on Postoperative Pain Control: A Systematic Review.
- Perioperative Interventions for Prevention of Prolonged Postoperative Ileus and Gastrointestinal Recovery After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Unreconciled postoperative imaging limits interpretation of gross-total resection in pediatric posterior fossa dermoids
- Prehabilitation for colon cancer surgery: a systematic review of quality-of-life outcomes and a feasibility study.
BibTeX
@article{kim2026effects,
title = {{Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after lung resection in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.}},
author = {Dongjin Kim and Gisoo Shin},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1939340},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898494},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after lung resection in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU - Dongjin Kim
AU - Gisoo Shin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1939340
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898494
AB - Introduction Lung resection is the standard curative treatment for resectable lung cancer; however, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) remain major barriers to recovery and healthcare efficiency. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation are distinct perioperative strategies that differ in their timing, intervention components, and mechanisms of action, but both aim to optimize patients' perioperative condition and improve postoperative recovery. However, their effectiveness compared with conventional perioperative care based solely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been comprehensively synthesized.Objectives To assess the effectiveness of ERAS and prehabilitation in reducing PPCs, shortening LOS, and improving patient-reported outcomes following pulmonary resection for lung cancer.Subjects and methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving adults undergoing pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, RISS, KISS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identified studies published between January 2015 and May 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for PPCs and mean differences (MDs) for LOS. Patient-reported outcomes were synthesized narratively according to the SWiM guideline.Results Ten RCTs involving 1,569 participants met the inclusion criteria. ERAS and prehabilitation significantly reduced PPCs compared with conventional perioperative care (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.36-0.65, p < 0.001). The exploratory pooled analysis suggested a shorter postoperative LOS (MD = -2.30 days, 95% CI = -3.58 to -1.01); however, heterogeneity was considerable (I ² = 97.9%), and the 95% prediction interval crossed the null. Narrative synthesis demonstrated consistent improvements in anxiety, depression, postoperative pain, pulmonary function, quality of life, and functional recovery.Conclusion ERAS and prehabilitation are effective perioperative strategies for improving outcomes after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Their implementation in routine clinical practice may reduce postoperative complications, accelerate recovery, and improve healthcare efficiency. Further multicenter RCTs are needed to optimize intervention components, standardize outcome measures, and strengthen evidence for long-term and patient-reported outcomes.Systematic review registration CRD420261373242.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -