Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Comparative Analysis of Buccal and Lingual Bone Thicknesses Following Immediate and Delayed Loading of Posterior Mandibular Implants

  1. 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, IND

Abstract

Introduction: Peri-implant bone preservation is a critical determinant of long-term implant survival. Although both immediate and delayed loading protocols have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, their influence on longitudinal buccal and lingual bone remodeling remains an area of investigation. This study compared peri-implant bone thickness changes following immediate and delayed loading in posterior mandibular implants using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 80 patients who received single posterior mandibular implants. The patients were divided into two groups: immediate loading (n = 40) and delayed loading (n = 40). Buccal bone thickness (BBT) and lingual bone thickness (LBT) were measured at the crestal, middle, and apical levels on standardized CBCT scans obtained immediately after implant placement and before prosthetic loading (T1), at six months (T2), and at 12 months (T3) after implant placement. Two-way mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), independent-samples t-test, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. The immediate loading group demonstrated significantly greater insertion torque (43.60 ± 4.83 vs. 33.29 ± 6.05 Ncm, p < 0.001) and implant stability quotient (72.17 ± 4.46 vs. 69.38 ± 4.21, p = 0.005). BBT decreased significantly in both groups during follow-up, with greater crestal bone loss in the immediate loading group (0.57 ± 0.17 mm) than in the delayed loading group (0.27 ± 0.09 mm). LBT also decreased over time but exhibited a smaller magnitude of remodeling than the buccal cortical plate. Two-way mixed RM-ANOVA demonstrated significant group × time interactions for both BBT and LBT (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression identified immediate loading as the strongest independent predictor of 12-month crestal buccal bone loss (β = 0.660, p < 0.001), whereas increasing age showed a modest protective association (β = -0.212, p = 0.008).

Conclusions: Both loading protocols demonstrated successful peri-implant bone adaptation during the first postoperative year. However, immediate loading was associated with greater peri-implant bone remodeling, particularly in the crestal region, whereas delayed loading resulted in better preservation of BBT and LBT. Careful patient selection and adequate primary implant stability are essential when immediate loading protocols are employed.

Related

  1. Retrospective CBCT-based anatomical assessment of mandibular first and second molars: a cross-sectional study with potential implications for immediate implant planning.
    Badr Othman
    The Saudi dental journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Comparison of bone augmentation techniques in the mandibular posterior region: A randomized clinical trial protocol
    Antonio Lanata-Flores, Marcelo Armijos Briones, Pablo Benítez Sellán +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  3. Management of Severe Dentoalveolar Trauma Following a Motorcycle Accident With Immediate Ridge Preservation and Delayed Implant Rehabilitation: A Case Report
    Norby Rodriguez
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Association of Mandibular Morphological and Trabecular Bone Characteristics with Long-Term Outcomes Following First Permanent Molar Extraction: A Retrospective Study
    Aybike Bas Ozturk, Gelengul Urvasizoglu, Rama Abdulkader +2
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Improving Immediate Postpartum Detection of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Added Diagnostic Value of Impedance Spectroscopy Following Clinical Assessment
    M. Uchman Musielak, K. Kleczkowska, I. Sudol Szopinska +1
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text1 citedObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{dev2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Analysis of Buccal and Lingual Bone Thicknesses Following Immediate and Delayed Loading of Posterior Mandibular Implants}},
  author = {Garima S Dev and Abhishek Balani and Vinay Kharsan and Abhishek Karan and Swati Sahu},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117200},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720932},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Analysis of Buccal and Lingual Bone Thicknesses Following Immediate and Delayed Loading of Posterior Mandibular Implants
AU  - Garima S Dev
AU  - Abhishek Balani
AU  - Vinay Kharsan
AU  - Abhishek Karan
AU  - Swati Sahu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117200
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720932
AB  - Introduction: Peri-implant bone preservation is a critical determinant of long-term implant survival. Although both immediate and delayed loading protocols have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, their influence on longitudinal buccal and lingual bone remodeling remains an area of investigation. This study compared peri-implant bone thickness changes following immediate and delayed loading in posterior mandibular implants using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).  Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 80 patients who received single posterior mandibular implants. The patients were divided into two groups: immediate loading (n = 40) and delayed loading (n = 40). Buccal bone thickness (BBT) and lingual bone thickness (LBT) were measured at the crestal, middle, and apical levels on standardized CBCT scans obtained immediately after implant placement and before prosthetic loading (T1), at six months (T2), and at 12 months (T3) after implant placement. Two-way mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), independent-samples t-test, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.  Results: The baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. The immediate loading group demonstrated significantly greater insertion torque (43.60 ± 4.83 vs. 33.29 ± 6.05 Ncm, p < 0.001) and implant stability quotient (72.17 ± 4.46 vs. 69.38 ± 4.21, p = 0.005). BBT decreased significantly in both groups during follow-up, with greater crestal bone loss in the immediate loading group (0.57 ± 0.17 mm) than in the delayed loading group (0.27 ± 0.09 mm). LBT also decreased over time but exhibited a smaller magnitude of remodeling than the buccal cortical plate. Two-way mixed RM-ANOVA demonstrated significant group × time interactions for both BBT and LBT (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression identified immediate loading as the strongest independent predictor of 12-month crestal buccal bone loss (β = 0.660, p < 0.001), whereas increasing age showed a modest protective association (β = -0.212, p = 0.008).  Conclusions: Both loading protocols demonstrated successful peri-implant bone adaptation during the first postoperative year. However, immediate loading was associated with greater peri-implant bone remodeling, particularly in the crestal region, whereas delayed loading resulted in better preservation of BBT and LBT. Careful patient selection and adequate primary implant stability are essential when immediate loading protocols are employed.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -