Undertreatment of Wernicke encephalopathy in alcohol-related clinical contexts: a scoping review of diagnosis, thiamine regimens, and clinical management.
5 affiliations
- 1Centro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (CPAD), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Av. Protásio Alves, 211 - Bloco C - Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre-RS, 90035-903, Brazil. [email protected].
- 2Departamento de Psiquiatria e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. [email protected].
- 3Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
- 4Centro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (CPAD), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Av. Protásio Alves, 211 - Bloco C - Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre-RS, 90035-903, Brazil.
- 5Departamento de Psiquiatria e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Abstract
Background
Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) is a potentially reversible neurological emergency that remains frequently missed and undertreated in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Although thiamine is widely accepted as the cornerstone of prevention and treatment, diagnostic uncertainty, limited comparative evidence, and heterogeneous clinical recommendations contribute to substantial variability in real-world management. This scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on the diagnosis and clinical management of WE in patients with AUD or clinically significant alcohol use, with particular attention to practice variability, undertreatment, and clinically actionable gaps in care.Methods
We conducted a scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Electronic databases and trial registries were searched for studies addressing the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of WE in populations with AUD or clinically significant alcohol use. Eligible sources included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, clinical audits, and implementation-focused reports. Data were charted and synthesized thematically.Results
A total of 26 studies were included. The evidence base was limited and heterogeneous. Only two randomized controlled trials evaluated thiamine regimens, and no consensus emerged regarding optimal dosing. Diagnostic criteria for WE varied widely across studies, with inconsistent use of formal criteria such as the Caine criteria. Across observational studies and prescribing audits, undertreatment was consistently reported, including delayed initiation of therapy and frequent use of oral thiamine in high-risk scenarios. Studies describing more protocolized and guideline-concordant care more often reported earlier treatment initiation and use of parenteral thiamine in suspected or confirmed cases.Conclusions
WE remains underrecognized and undertreated in AUD and clinically significant alcohol use. The mapped evidence suggests that diagnostic uncertainty, limited trial data, and inconsistent implementation of recommendations are associated with persistent variability in care. Although the optimal thiamine regimen remains unresolved, early recognition and appropriate parenteral treatment in high-risk or suspected cases represent actionable opportunities to reduce preventable neurological morbidity.
Related
- Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy Mimicking Wernicke's Encephalopathy
- Atypical Cerebellar Vermis Signal Abnormality in Wernicke Encephalopathy
- Refeeding Syndrome Induced by Fursultiamine Infusion in Wernicke Encephalopathy: A Case Report
- Beyond Ophthalmoplegia: Wernicke Encephalopathy with Anisocoria.
- Pediatric Headache: A Practical Approach to Clinical Diagnosis and Management
BibTeX
@article{goldani2026undertreatment,
title = {{Undertreatment of Wernicke encephalopathy in alcohol-related clinical contexts: a scoping review of diagnosis, thiamine regimens, and clinical management.}},
author = {André Akira Sueno Goldani and Gabriel Feitosa and Eduarda Vasconcelos Colchete and Cristhian Ferreira Falleiro and Cristine Weihrauch Pedro and Félix Henrique Paim Kessler and Thiago M Fidalgo and Lisia von Diemen},
journal = {Addiction science \& clinical practice},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s13722-026-00687-x},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897605},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Undertreatment of Wernicke encephalopathy in alcohol-related clinical contexts: a scoping review of diagnosis, thiamine regimens, and clinical management.
AU - André Akira Sueno Goldani
AU - Gabriel Feitosa
AU - Eduarda Vasconcelos Colchete
AU - Cristhian Ferreira Falleiro
AU - Cristine Weihrauch Pedro
AU - Félix Henrique Paim Kessler
AU - Thiago M Fidalgo
AU - Lisia von Diemen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Addiction science & clinical practice
DO - 10.1186/s13722-026-00687-x
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897605
AB - Background Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) is a potentially reversible neurological emergency that remains frequently missed and undertreated in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Although thiamine is widely accepted as the cornerstone of prevention and treatment, diagnostic uncertainty, limited comparative evidence, and heterogeneous clinical recommendations contribute to substantial variability in real-world management. This scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on the diagnosis and clinical management of WE in patients with AUD or clinically significant alcohol use, with particular attention to practice variability, undertreatment, and clinically actionable gaps in care.Methods We conducted a scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Electronic databases and trial registries were searched for studies addressing the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of WE in populations with AUD or clinically significant alcohol use. Eligible sources included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, clinical audits, and implementation-focused reports. Data were charted and synthesized thematically.Results A total of 26 studies were included. The evidence base was limited and heterogeneous. Only two randomized controlled trials evaluated thiamine regimens, and no consensus emerged regarding optimal dosing. Diagnostic criteria for WE varied widely across studies, with inconsistent use of formal criteria such as the Caine criteria. Across observational studies and prescribing audits, undertreatment was consistently reported, including delayed initiation of therapy and frequent use of oral thiamine in high-risk scenarios. Studies describing more protocolized and guideline-concordant care more often reported earlier treatment initiation and use of parenteral thiamine in suspected or confirmed cases.Conclusions WE remains underrecognized and undertreated in AUD and clinically significant alcohol use. The mapped evidence suggests that diagnostic uncertainty, limited trial data, and inconsistent implementation of recommendations are associated with persistent variability in care. Although the optimal thiamine regimen remains unresolved, early recognition and appropriate parenteral treatment in high-risk or suspected cases represent actionable opportunities to reduce preventable neurological morbidity.
SN - 1940-0632
SN - 1940-0640
ER -