Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Allocation of TSPO-PET signals to cellular and extracellular compartments in dependence of blood-brain barrier disruption in experimental glioblastoma

6 more authors
11 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  2. 2Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  4. 4Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
  5. 5German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich, Munich, Germany
  6. 6Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
  7. 7Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  8. 8German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, A Partnership Between the DKFZ Heidelberg and the University Hospital of the LMU, Munich, Germany
  9. 9Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
  10. 10Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  11. 11Biomedical Center (BMC), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany

Abstract

Background: Translocator protein (TSPO)-PET imaging facilitates monitoring of glioblastoma in preclinical models and patients. However, specificity of TSPO-PET signals remains to be investigated. In this study, we aimed to decipher exact contributions of cellular and extracellular compartments including the impact of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption to TSPO-PET signals in an experimental glioblastoma mouse model.

Methods: Mice with implanted glioblastoma (SB28; n = 36 early-stage, n = 39 late-stage; GFP(+)) were injected with the TSPO tracer [18F]GE-180 (21 MBq ± 1.5 MBq). Dynamic 60 min microPET scans were performed with and without prior blocking by excessive cold radiotracer. Tumors were dissociated, followed by cell sorting of tumor cells, tumor-associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs, CD11b(+)) and non-tumor/non-TAM (i.e. remaining) cells with subsequent gamma emission measures and flow cytometry (scRadiotracing) to calculate radioactivity per single cell. PET signals and single-cell tracer uptake in tumors and non-lesional hemispheres were compared between blocked and unblocked conditions. N = 10 mice were intravenously injected with fluorescent Dextran to investigate BBB disruption by confocal microscopy in correlation with TSPO-PET signals of the same animals.

Results: TSPO-PET indicated strong but incomplete signal reduction after blocking in tumors (early-stage: -72%; late-stage: -59%, p < 0.001) and contralateral hemispheres (early stage: -65%, late-stage: -63%, p < 0.001) compared to unblocked animals. We found nearly complete blocking of radiotracer uptake across all analyzed cell fractions (tumor cells: -95%, p = 0.0039; TAMs: -98%, p < 0.0001; remaining cells: -99%, p = 0.0033) compared to unblocked mice, regardless of tumor stages. There was a significant correlation of PET signal reduction (R=-0.824, p = 0.0034) as well as residual PET signal upon blocking (R = 0.809, p = 0.0046) with Dextran intensity.

Conclusion: Specificity of TSPO-PET signals in experimental glioblastoma reaches 72% in early-stage tumors, but decreases to 59% in late-stage SB28 tumors, due to progressive contributions of BBB disruption. Non-specific TSPO tracer uptake is driven by BBB disruption and fully allocated to the extracellular compartment, whereas cellular TSPO tracer uptake shows strong specificity.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5.

Related

  1. Beyond tumor volume: connectomic measures of tumor burden provide superior prognostic information across tumor compartments in glioblastoma
    J. Falco-Roget, A. Ielo, A. Janus +11
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textOncologymedRxiv
  2. Effects of panitumumab on the proteome of treated EGFRvIII glioblastoma cells and on their extracellular vesicles
    A. Gateau, B. Moeglen-Paget, S. Durand +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  3. Microglia-derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Promote Bone Marrow Monocyte Expansion and Recruitment in Glioblastoma.
    I. Albuja, M. Quiralte, N. Panda +6
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  4. Effects of video reinforcement following face-to-face CPR/AED training on knowledge, attitude, and simulated performance among frontline community workers: a quasi-experimental study with post-training randomized allocation
    Farzaneh Mirzaei, Ali Nasiri, Abbas Abbaszadeh +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General medicineCrossref
  5. Microenvironmental IL13 Rα2 Expression and Enable Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Antigen Transfer in Glioblastoma
    Yujun Wang, Ryan Urak, Clara Chen +3
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{hoermann2026allocation,
  title = {{Allocation of TSPO-PET signals to cellular and extracellular compartments in dependence of blood-brain barrier disruption in experimental glioblastoma}},
  author = {Leonie Hoermann and Fatma Burcu Seker and Emanuel Joseph and Sabrina V Kirchleitner and Jens Blobner and Lea H Kunze and Justus F Thevis and Selina Hummel and Amelie L Englert and Karin Wind-Mark and Adrien Holzgreve and Simon Lindner and Rudolf A Werner and Louisa von Baumgarten and Nathalie L Albert and Nikolaus Plesnila and Matthias Brendel and Laura M Bartos},
  journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Allocation of TSPO-PET signals to cellular and extracellular compartments in dependence of blood-brain barrier disruption in experimental glioblastoma
AU  - Leonie Hoermann
AU  - Fatma Burcu Seker
AU  - Emanuel Joseph
AU  - Sabrina V Kirchleitner
AU  - Jens Blobner
AU  - Lea H Kunze
AU  - Justus F Thevis
AU  - Selina Hummel
AU  - Amelie L Englert
AU  - Karin Wind-Mark
AU  - Adrien Holzgreve
AU  - Simon Lindner
AU  - Rudolf A Werner
AU  - Louisa von Baumgarten
AU  - Nathalie L Albert
AU  - Nikolaus Plesnila
AU  - Matthias Brendel
AU  - Laura M Bartos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
JO  - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
DO  - 10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5
AB  - Background: Translocator protein (TSPO)-PET imaging facilitates monitoring of glioblastoma in preclinical models and patients. However, specificity of TSPO-PET signals remains to be investigated. In this study, we aimed to decipher exact contributions of cellular and extracellular compartments including the impact of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption to TSPO-PET signals in an experimental glioblastoma mouse model.  Methods: Mice with implanted glioblastoma (SB28; n = 36 early-stage, n = 39 late-stage; GFP(+)) were injected with the TSPO tracer [18F]GE-180 (21 MBq ± 1.5 MBq). Dynamic 60 min microPET scans were performed with and without prior blocking by excessive cold radiotracer. Tumors were dissociated, followed by cell sorting of tumor cells, tumor-associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs, CD11b(+)) and non-tumor/non-TAM (i.e. remaining) cells with subsequent gamma emission measures and flow cytometry (scRadiotracing) to calculate radioactivity per single cell. PET signals and single-cell tracer uptake in tumors and non-lesional hemispheres were compared between blocked and unblocked conditions. N = 10 mice were intravenously injected with fluorescent Dextran to investigate BBB disruption by confocal microscopy in correlation with TSPO-PET signals of the same animals.  Results: TSPO-PET indicated strong but incomplete signal reduction after blocking in tumors (early-stage: -72%; late-stage: -59%, p < 0.001) and contralateral hemispheres (early stage: -65%, late-stage: -63%, p < 0.001) compared to unblocked animals. We found nearly complete blocking of radiotracer uptake across all analyzed cell fractions (tumor cells: -95%, p = 0.0039; TAMs: -98%, p < 0.0001; remaining cells: -99%, p = 0.0033) compared to unblocked mice, regardless of tumor stages. There was a significant correlation of PET signal reduction (R=-0.824, p = 0.0034) as well as residual PET signal upon blocking (R = 0.809, p = 0.0046) with Dextran intensity.  Conclusion: Specificity of TSPO-PET signals in experimental glioblastoma reaches 72% in early-stage tumors, but decreases to 59% in late-stage SB28 tumors, due to progressive contributions of BBB disruption. Non-specific TSPO tracer uptake is driven by BBB disruption and fully allocated to the extracellular compartment, whereas cellular TSPO tracer uptake shows strong specificity.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08187-5.
SN  - 1619-7070
SN  - 1619-7089
ER  -