Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment

Why diffusion models do not memorize: the role of implicit dynamical regularization in training

Abstract

Diffusion models have attained remarkable success across a wide range of generative tasks. A key challenge lies in understanding the mechanisms that prevent their memorization of training data and allow generalization. In this work, we investigate the role of the training dynamics in the transition from generalization to memorization. Through extensive experiments and theoretical analysis, we identify two distinct timescales: an early time τ gen at which models begin to generate high-quality samples and a later time τ mem beyond which memorization emerges. Crucially, we found that τ mem increases linearly with the training set size n, whereas τ gen remains constant. This creates a growing window of training times with n where models generalize effectively, despite showing strong memorization if training continues beyond it. It is only when n becomes larger than a model-dependent threshold that overfitting disappears at infinite training times. These findings reveal a form of implicit dynamical regularization 3 Equal contribution.

Related

  1. First Learn, Then Memorize: The Spectral Bias of Diffusion Models
    Raphaël Urfin, Tony Bonnaire, Giulio Biroli +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. NNLO Final-State Quark-Pair Corrections in Implicit Regularization
    Ricardo J. C. Rosado, Adriano Cherchiglia, Marcos Sampaio +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Curvture Regularization and Dynamical Vacuum Structure in Pseudo-Complex General Relativity
    Fridolin Weber, Peter Otto Hess, Cesar Augusto Zen Vasconcellos
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Exploring the construction of field equations for regular black holes with dynamical regularization scales
    Raúl Carballo-Rubio, Jacopo Mazza
    HALPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityHALarXiv
  5. Multiscale Modeling of Ion Transport in Nanopores: Fitting Implicit-Water Radial Diffusion Profiles to Explicit-Water Molecular Dynamics
    Mónika Valiskó, Salman Shabbir, Eszter Molnárné Lakics +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{bonnaire2026diffusion,
  title = {{Why diffusion models do not memorize: the role of implicit dynamical regularization in training}},
  author = {Tony Bonnaire and Raphaël Urfin and Giulio Biroli and Marc Mezard},
  journal = {Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1088/1742-5468/ae7e6a},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05767724v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why diffusion models do not memorize: the role of implicit dynamical regularization in training
AU  - Tony Bonnaire
AU  - Raphaël Urfin
AU  - Giulio Biroli
AU  - Marc Mezard
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/19
JO  - Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
DO  - 10.1088/1742-5468/ae7e6a
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05767724v1
AB  - Diffusion models have attained remarkable success across a wide range of generative tasks. A key challenge lies in understanding the mechanisms that prevent their memorization of training data and allow generalization. In this work, we investigate the role of the training dynamics in the transition from generalization to memorization. Through extensive experiments and theoretical analysis, we identify two distinct timescales: an early time τ gen at which models begin to generate high-quality samples and a later time τ mem beyond which memorization emerges. Crucially, we found that τ mem increases linearly with the training set size n, whereas τ gen remains constant. This creates a growing window of training times with n where models generalize effectively, despite showing strong memorization if training continues beyond it. It is only when n becomes larger than a model-dependent threshold that overfitting disappears at infinite training times. These findings reveal a form of implicit dynamical regularization 3 Equal contribution.
SN  - 1742-5468
ER  -