Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

The sharp leading asymptotics of the self-energy of the spinless Pauli-Fierz model

Abstract

We consider the ground state energy E_0(alpha, Lambda) of a single spinless non-relativistic electron coupled to the quantized radiation field with a sharp ultraviolet cutoff Lambda (the Pauli-Fierz model), with fine structure constant alpha = e^2/(4 pi). Lieb and Loss proved that C_1 alpha^(1/2) Lambda^(3/2) <= E_0 <= C_2 alpha^(2/7) Lambda^(12/7) for large Lambda and suggested that the upper bound, which comes from product states, gives the correct order. We prove that, for every fixed alpha > 0, E_0(alpha, Lambda) = (1+o(1)) c_alpha alpha^(2/7) Lambda^(12/7) as Lambda -> infinity, with an explicit constant c_alpha = 0.99338...; more generally, this holds uniformly in the joint limit Lambda/alpha -> infinity, alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> infinity, provided log(2+alpha) = o((Lambda/alpha)^(1/21)). Since our upper bound holds already for the infimum over product states, it follows that the ratio of E_0 to this infimum tends to one: electron-field correlations do not contribute to the leading term. The condition alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> infinity cannot be dropped, since for alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> 0 the vacuum trial state gives a smaller energy. The upper bound follows from a coherent state bound for the field energy in a fixed electron density. The lower bound combines a periodization of the field, a Born-Oppenheimer bound in which phase multiplication and a Hardy inequality in field space are applied block by block, and a lower bound on the magnetic Neumann Laplacian on a cube for band-limited fields; the key point of the last is that a band-limited field obeying a weighted gradient condition cannot concentrate its vorticity.

Related

  1. Computation of leading coefficients in asymptotics of relative quantum invariants
    Ka Ho Wong, Tian Yang
    Advances in MathematicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text11 citedGeometry & topologyOpenAlex
  2. Sharp universal death of entanglement threshold for Pauli Hamiltonians
    Bobak T. Kiani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Sharp Minimax Gram-Determinant Asymptotics for Labelled Unit Decompositions of the Identity and Recent Developments on Makai's Conjecture
    Haozhou Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyProbabilityarXiv
  4. Asymptotics of Laplace and Stokes solutions in the gap between a sharp tip and a smooth boundary
    Nicolas Roblet
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsHALarXiv
  5. Sharp asymptotics for a transport model with a nonlocal condition of the Fisher-KPP type at the boundary
    Grégory Faye, Jean-Michel Roquejoffre, Mingmin Zhang
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{futakuchi2026sharp,
  title = {{The sharp leading asymptotics of the self-energy of the spinless Pauli-Fierz model}},
  author = {Shinichiro Futakuchi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.34122},
  eprint = {2610.34122},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34122},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The sharp leading asymptotics of the self-energy of the spinless Pauli-Fierz model
AU  - Shinichiro Futakuchi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.34122
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34122
AB  - We consider the ground state energy E_0(alpha, Lambda) of a single spinless non-relativistic electron coupled to the quantized radiation field with a sharp ultraviolet cutoff Lambda (the Pauli-Fierz model), with fine structure constant alpha = e^2/(4 pi). Lieb and Loss proved that C_1 alpha^(1/2) Lambda^(3/2) <= E_0 <= C_2 alpha^(2/7) Lambda^(12/7) for large Lambda and suggested that the upper bound, which comes from product states, gives the correct order. We prove that, for every fixed alpha > 0, E_0(alpha, Lambda) = (1+o(1)) c_alpha alpha^(2/7) Lambda^(12/7) as Lambda -> infinity, with an explicit constant c_alpha = 0.99338...; more generally, this holds uniformly in the joint limit Lambda/alpha -> infinity, alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> infinity, provided log(2+alpha) = o((Lambda/alpha)^(1/21)). Since our upper bound holds already for the infimum over product states, it follows that the ratio of E_0 to this infimum tends to one: electron-field correlations do not contribute to the leading term. The condition alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> infinity cannot be dropped, since for alpha^(5/2) Lambda -> 0 the vacuum trial state gives a smaller energy. The upper bound follows from a coherent state bound for the field energy in a fixed electron density. The lower bound combines a periodization of the field, a Born-Oppenheimer bound in which phase multiplication and a Hardy inequality in field space are applied block by block, and a lower bound on the magnetic Neumann Laplacian on a cube for band-limited fields; the key point of the last is that a band-limited field obeying a weighted gradient condition cannot concentrate its vorticity.
ER  -