Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,578 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Predicting Lifespan-Extending Compounds Using Supervised Machine Learning

  1. 1Imperial College London

Abstract

Identifying lifespan-extending compounds is an important objective in ageing research, but experimental screening remains costly and time consuming. This study evaluates supervised machine learning for predicting lifespan-extending compounds in Caenorhabditis elegans using compound-protein interaction features derived from the STITCH database. Three feature representations were compared: continuous interaction probabilities, binary features generated using a fixed threshold of 0.5, and binary features generated using an optimised threshold selected within cross-validation. Random Forest and XGBoost classifiers were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation, with performance assessed by accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). Model interpretation was examined using Mean Decrease in Impurity (MDI), SHAP, TreeSHAP, and LIME, with Jaccard similarity used to compare the top-ranked protein features. Random Forest achieved its highest accuracy (78.84%), AUROC (0.7391), and AUPRC (0.5202) using the fixed threshold binary representation. XGBoost achieved its highest accuracy (80.36%) using the optimised threshold representation, whereas continuous features yielded its highest AUROC (0.7605) and AUPRC (0.5332). SHAP and TreeSHAP showed the strongest agreement in protein rankings, producing identical top-10 feature sets across all three XGBoost representations. These findings demonstrate that feature representation influences both predictive performance and model interpretation, highlighting the importance of evaluating classification metrics alongside explainability when prioritising candidate compounds for further ageing research.

Related

  1. CloneOT: predicting clone-specific perturbation responses with lineage-supervised neural inverse optimal transport
    Yanshuo Chen, Wei Chen, Heng Huang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsarXiv
  2. Predicting and finding geroprotective compounds through modulating conserved longevity–associated aging modules
    Weihan Huai, Li-Fang Ng, Jasinda H. Lee +16
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYCell biologyCrossref
  3. Predicting Transcriptional Responses to Unseen Compounds through Context Modeling and Multi-View Transfer
    Y. Lei, H. Liang, K. Peng +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. Learning from Error Predictions Rather Than Prediction Errors: A Perspective on Self-Supervised Learning in the Brain
    Nicolas Meirhaeghe
    The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textNeurosciencePMC
  5. Exploring noise in TCR specificity data through supervised learning
    S. N. Deleuran, Y. Basavaraju, R. Matuleviciute +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{acharya2026predicting,
  title = {{Predicting Lifespan-Extending Compounds Using Supervised Machine Learning}},
  author = {D. D. Acharya and A. Freitas},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.16.759743},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759743v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Predicting Lifespan-Extending Compounds Using Supervised Machine Learning
AU  - D. D. Acharya
AU  - A. Freitas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.16.759743
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759743v1
AB  - Identifying lifespan-extending compounds is an important objective in ageing research, but experimental screening remains costly and time consuming. This study evaluates supervised machine learning for predicting lifespan-extending compounds in Caenorhabditis elegans using compound-protein interaction features derived from the STITCH database. Three feature representations were compared: continuous interaction probabilities, binary features generated using a fixed threshold of 0.5, and binary features generated using an optimised threshold selected within cross-validation. Random Forest and XGBoost classifiers were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation, with performance assessed by accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). Model interpretation was examined using Mean Decrease in Impurity (MDI), SHAP, TreeSHAP, and LIME, with Jaccard similarity used to compare the top-ranked protein features. Random Forest achieved its highest accuracy (78.84%), AUROC (0.7391), and AUPRC (0.5202) using the fixed threshold binary representation. XGBoost achieved its highest accuracy (80.36%) using the optimised threshold representation, whereas continuous features yielded its highest AUROC (0.7605) and AUPRC (0.5332). SHAP and TreeSHAP showed the strongest agreement in protein rankings, producing identical top-10 feature sets across all three XGBoost representations. These findings demonstrate that feature representation influences both predictive performance and model interpretation, highlighting the importance of evaluating classification metrics alongside explainability when prioritising candidate compounds for further ageing research.
ER  -