Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches to Identifying Selection in Evolutionary Datasets

  1. 1Duke University

Abstract

We consider the problem of identifying individual sites and characters under selection in phylogenetic datasets. We introduce an approach based on the application of Bayesian variable selection to mutation-selection models, which enables both sites and selection coefficients to be explicitly excluded from the model in order to control parameter complexity. We provide an accelerated Gibbs sampling algorithm for model selection and parameter estimation, which enables our approach to scale to realistic sequence lengths and dataset sizes. We compare this approach to previous models that do not produce sparse solutions but attempt to control complexity through Dirichlet-process (DP) mixture model prior distributions. We demonstrate that the Bayesian variable selection approach outperforms the DP approach for a wide range of settings and selection signal strengths, while offering additional advantages of sparsity and interpretability. We also identify a problem of the DP prior producing "phantom selection" artifacts, on both simulated and real datasets, which the Bayesian variable selection approach avoids.

Related

  1. A Two-Stage Bayesian Approach for Variable Selection in Joint Modeling of Multiple Longitudinal Markers with Competing Risks
    Taban Baghfalaki, Reza Hashemi, Christophe Tzourio +2
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Eco-evolutionary Dynamics of Colonization: When Does Source Selection Matter?
    E. N. Rowland, H. J. Wearing, D. Gulisija
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  3. Intra-DNA k-mer conservation patterns encode evolutionary selection of variants
    Bernadette Mathew, Abhishek Halder, Nancy Jaiswal +10
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Evolutionary biologyMicrobiologyCrossrefCell Press
  4. Built-in Selection Bias in Proportional Hazards Models with Omitted Covariates: Simulation Evidence and Alternative Approaches
    Ayoub Bifenzi, Helene Jacqmin-Gadda
    Statistical Methods in Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. INDITEK ‐2.0: A Bayesian inverse modelling framework for mechanistic evolutionary processes
    Gloria Herrero‐gascón, Carmen García‐comas, Thomas Bodin +5
    Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyHAL
BibTeX
@misc{li2026bayesian,
  title = {{Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches to Identifying Selection in Evolutionary Datasets}},
  author = {Y. Li and S. Schmidler},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.19.760252},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.19.760252v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches to Identifying Selection in Evolutionary Datasets
AU  - Y. Li
AU  - S. Schmidler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.19.760252
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.19.760252v1
AB  - We consider the problem of identifying individual sites and characters under selection in phylogenetic datasets. We introduce an approach based on the application of Bayesian variable selection to mutation-selection models, which enables both sites and selection coefficients to be explicitly excluded from the model in order to control parameter complexity. We provide an accelerated Gibbs sampling algorithm for model selection and parameter estimation, which enables our approach to scale to realistic sequence lengths and dataset sizes. We compare this approach to previous models that do not produce sparse solutions but attempt to control complexity through Dirichlet-process (DP) mixture model prior distributions. We demonstrate that the Bayesian variable selection approach outperforms the DP approach for a wide range of settings and selection signal strengths, while offering additional advantages of sparsity and interpretability. We also identify a problem of the DP prior producing "phantom selection" artifacts, on both simulated and real datasets, which the Bayesian variable selection approach avoids.
ER  -