Volatile Anesthetic-Based Combination Strategies Against Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Experimental Evidence, Molecular Mechanisms, and Translational Limitations
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara 06490, Türkiye
- 2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara 06560, Türkiye
- 3Life Sciences Application and Research Center, Gazi University, Ankara 06830, Türkiye
- 4Laboratory Animal Breeding and Experimental Research Center (GÜDAM), Gazi University, Ankara 06510, Türkiye
Abstract
Ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury is a complex pathological process involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, calcium overload, excessive reactive oxygen species generation, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory activation, and regulated cell death. Volatile anesthetics, including sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane, may modulate several of these processes through antioxidant and prosurvival signaling, suppression of inflammatory pathways, and regulation of apoptosis. Because I/R injury involves interconnected mechanisms, combining interventions that act on different targets may offer additional protection. Experimental studies have investigated volatile anesthetics together with fullerenol C60, ischemic conditioning, and selected pharmacological interventions. Other combination strategies involving ozone conditioning and boric acid have also been evaluated in experimental models, although these have not established the effects of combining either intervention with a volatile anesthetic. This narrative review examines the molecular mechanisms and organ-specific evidence underlying these approaches, with particular attention to study design, treatment timing, and the interpretation of combined effects. While some combinations have shown greater protection than individual interventions, the findings remain heterogeneous, and formal analyses distinguishing additivity from synergy are generally lacking. Clinical evidence is limited, and further studies are needed to establish whether these experimental findings can be translated into meaningful patient outcomes.
Related
- Pstpip2-deficient mouse models in SAPHO syndrome research: Utility, mechanistic insights, and translational limitations
- Bridging the Translational Gap in Artificial Intelligence for Otology and Neurotology: Clinical Readiness, Limitations, and Research Priorities
- Nanodelivery of Brucine in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Mitochondrial PANoptosis, Cardiotoxicity, and Translational Barriers.
- Brain cytoprotection in acute ischemic stroke in the reperfusion era: neuroimmune networks, clinical evidence, and translational barriers
- Animal models of anemia of inflammation: Methodological advances, limitations, and translational applications
BibTeX
@article{sengel2026volatile,
title = {{Volatile Anesthetic-Based Combination Strategies Against Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Experimental Evidence, Molecular Mechanisms, and Translational Limitations}},
author = {Necmiye Şengel and Mustafa Arslan},
journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/ijms27209335},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/20/9335},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Volatile Anesthetic-Based Combination Strategies Against Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Experimental Evidence, Molecular Mechanisms, and Translational Limitations
AU - Necmiye Şengel
AU - Mustafa Arslan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
DO - 10.3390/ijms27209335
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/20/9335
AB - Ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury is a complex pathological process involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, calcium overload, excessive reactive oxygen species generation, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory activation, and regulated cell death. Volatile anesthetics, including sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane, may modulate several of these processes through antioxidant and prosurvival signaling, suppression of inflammatory pathways, and regulation of apoptosis. Because I/R injury involves interconnected mechanisms, combining interventions that act on different targets may offer additional protection. Experimental studies have investigated volatile anesthetics together with fullerenol C60, ischemic conditioning, and selected pharmacological interventions. Other combination strategies involving ozone conditioning and boric acid have also been evaluated in experimental models, although these have not established the effects of combining either intervention with a volatile anesthetic. This narrative review examines the molecular mechanisms and organ-specific evidence underlying these approaches, with particular attention to study design, treatment timing, and the interpretation of combined effects. While some combinations have shown greater protection than individual interventions, the findings remain heterogeneous, and formal analyses distinguishing additivity from synergy are generally lacking. Clinical evidence is limited, and further studies are needed to establish whether these experimental findings can be translated into meaningful patient outcomes.
SN - 1422-0067
ER -