A global review of factors influencing decision-making on landfill mining and composition of mined residues
4 affiliations
- 1Research Group on Resource Management and Solid Waste Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Kassel, Germany
- 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- 4Residues and Resource Reclamation Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, 1 Cleantech Loop, Singapore
Abstract
Landfill mining (LFM) has gained momentum worldwide as a strategy to remediate legacy landfills (LeLas). Despite growing global interest, a systematic understanding of the factors guiding LFM suitability and composition of landfill mined residues (LMRs) has been meagre. Whether a LeLa is considered suitable for LFM depends on factors, including motivations for LFM, environmental impacts, economic impacts, the usability of LMRs, and the availability of alternative remediation strategies. Our review shows that LFM projects and studies worldwide are primarily driven by environmental remediation and resource recovery, with these motivations accounting for 34% and 25%, respectively. Key motivations in developing countries are less diverse than in developed countries, largely due to the severe environmental impacts caused by dumpsites in former setups. The availability of alternative remediation strategies could act in favour of or opposition to mining a landfill and is discussed for case studies in India and Estonia. The composition of LMRs, which is relevant to evaluating environmental and economic impacts, varies from one project to another. Based on data from 73 LeLas, age and depth of LMRs, geographical location, and income levels are identified as major factors influencing the composition of LMRs. Regardless of these factor dependencies, landfill-mined-soil-like-fraction is the major fraction (accounting for 35% and 75%) of LMRs. These findings support estimating material stocks in LeLas and prospective material flows from field-scale projects as a basis for developing effective LFM strategies. The novelty of this review includes (i) the first systematic distinction between major LFM motivations in developed and developing countries, and (ii) the first global quantification of LMRs’ composition dependencies on-site-specific factors (age and depth) and system-specific factors (geographical settings and income level). Overall, these insights establish a strong empirical basis for assessing LFM feasibility and supporting informed decision-making.
Related
- XAI-driven analysis of influencing factors in streamflow-based flood forecasting via fine tuned MTV19Anet
- Modified Hydrogels Against Phosphorus Pollution in Aqueous Environments: A Meta-Quantitative Analysis of Performance and Key Influencing Factors.
- Soil aggregate stability and its influencing factors in Picea Schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forests of the Central Tianshan Mountains
- Spatial differentiation and potential influencing factors of land-surface heat exposure based on street-view imagery: a case study of Luolong District, Luoyang.
- Uncertainty quantification for renewable energy generation from landfill methane
BibTeX
@article{goli2026global,
title = {{A global review of factors influencing decision-making on landfill mining and composition of mined residues}},
author = {Venkata Siva Naga Sai Goli and Zhibo Zhang and Xunchang Fei},
journal = {Waste Management \& Research},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1177/0734242x261456531},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x261456531},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A global review of factors influencing decision-making on landfill mining and composition of mined residues
AU - Venkata Siva Naga Sai Goli
AU - Zhibo Zhang
AU - Xunchang Fei
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/29
JO - Waste Management & Research
DO - 10.1177/0734242x261456531
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x261456531
AB - Landfill mining (LFM) has gained momentum worldwide as a strategy to remediate legacy landfills (LeLas). Despite growing global interest, a systematic understanding of the factors guiding LFM suitability and composition of landfill mined residues (LMRs) has been meagre. Whether a LeLa is considered suitable for LFM depends on factors, including motivations for LFM, environmental impacts, economic impacts, the usability of LMRs, and the availability of alternative remediation strategies. Our review shows that LFM projects and studies worldwide are primarily driven by environmental remediation and resource recovery, with these motivations accounting for 34% and 25%, respectively. Key motivations in developing countries are less diverse than in developed countries, largely due to the severe environmental impacts caused by dumpsites in former setups. The availability of alternative remediation strategies could act in favour of or opposition to mining a landfill and is discussed for case studies in India and Estonia. The composition of LMRs, which is relevant to evaluating environmental and economic impacts, varies from one project to another. Based on data from 73 LeLas, age and depth of LMRs, geographical location, and income levels are identified as major factors influencing the composition of LMRs. Regardless of these factor dependencies, landfill-mined-soil-like-fraction is the major fraction (accounting for 35% and 75%) of LMRs. These findings support estimating material stocks in LeLas and prospective material flows from field-scale projects as a basis for developing effective LFM strategies. The novelty of this review includes (i) the first systematic distinction between major LFM motivations in developed and developing countries, and (ii) the first global quantification of LMRs’ composition dependencies on-site-specific factors (age and depth) and system-specific factors (geographical settings and income level). Overall, these insights establish a strong empirical basis for assessing LFM feasibility and supporting informed decision-making.
SN - 0734-242X
SN - 1096-3669
ER -