PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
How Is Uzbek NLP Evaluated? A Critical Evidence Map of Datasets, Benchmarks, and Linguistic Coverage
- 1Independent student researcher, Uzbekistan
Abstract
This paper presents a critical evidence map of 20 Uzbek NLP datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation records. It examines evaluation comparability, linguistic coverage, script variation, data provenance, annotation quality, test protocols, and metric interpretation. The review is based on a targeted search updated on 21 October 2026. It is preliminary and is not an exhaustive systematic review; no models were rerun, and no released datasets were independently recounted. This version is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.
Related
- Questioning the Benchmarks: Hidden Circularity in AQ-10 Autism Screening Datasets
- Food systems performance evaluated against targets and benchmarks reveals urgent gaps and a path to 2050
- The Distribution of Lexical Information Within Dependency Spans: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from 22 Languages
- When Different Relational Experiences with AI Become Visible in Conversation: Linguistic and Dyadic Evidence from Naturalistic ChatGPT Interactions
- Hybrid spatial organization and evidence for magnitude-independent neural coding of linguistic information during sentence production
BibTeX
@misc{isroilov2026uzbek,
title = {{How Is Uzbek NLP Evaluated? A Critical Evidence Map of Datasets, Benchmarks, and Linguistic Coverage}},
author = {Ismoiljon Isroilov},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23551776},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23551776},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - How Is Uzbek NLP Evaluated? A Critical Evidence Map of Datasets, Benchmarks, and Linguistic Coverage
AU - Ismoiljon Isroilov
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23551776
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23551776
AB - This paper presents a critical evidence map of 20 Uzbek NLP datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation records. It examines evaluation comparability, linguistic coverage, script variation, data provenance, annotation quality, test protocols, and metric interpretation. The review is based on a targeted search updated on 21 October 2026. It is preliminary and is not an exhaustive systematic review; no models were rerun, and no released datasets were independently recounted. This version is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.
ER -