Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Information Content of Krylov Observables: A Machine Learning Approach

Abstract

We employ machine learning techniques to estimate the amount of information contained in three Krylov-space observables: the spread complexity C(t), the discrete Wigner negativity N(t), and the normalized negativity χ(t)=N(t)/|S(t)|, where S(t) is the survival amplitude. We study thermofield-double evolutions on GUE, GOE and Poisson spectra, and on the integrable SL(2,R) Krylov chain of a two-dimensional CFT primary, with Lanczos coefficients bn=α√(n(n+2h−1)). To introduce chaos we add a GUE random matrix to the integrable chain, H(ε)=HSL(2,R)+ε R0 WGUE, where R0 is its spectral half-width. Either C(t) or N(t) alone determines the thermofield temperature, with R2≃0.999. However, neither can reconstruct the fine structure of the spectral form factor. In the integrable sector all three observables carry the same information. When we turn on chaos an asymmetry appears: χ predicts C better than C predicts χ. This gap grows from +0.33 to +0.77, while the same gap for the raw negativity decays to zero. The extra information comes from the survival amplitude, and χ(t) carries it while C(t) can still be recovered from χ(t). We derive a lower bound on this gap, set by the fraction of the variance of χ that comes from S.

Versions

Related

  1. Transparency Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Trust: Information Leakage and Procedural Overfitting in Supervised Machine Learning for Psychology
    Rosa Lavelle-Hill
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsOSF
  2. From Common Information to Canonical Correlation Analysis and Beyond: Bridging Information Theory, Signal Processing, and Machine Learning
    Paris A. Karakasis, Walid Saad
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. The Sombor deletion correction term: extremal structure, exact coincidence classification, and the information content of edge decks, with applications to chemistry
    Junyi Gong
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeometry & topologyChemRxiv
  4. Task-Sufficient Contraction: Source Selection for Machine Information Interfaces
    Joss Armstrong
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. The optimal information complexity of VC learning
    Steve Hanneke, Juexiao Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{basu2026information,
  title = {{The Information Content of Krylov Observables: A Machine Learning Approach}},
  author = {Ritam Basu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.17346},
  eprint = {2607.17346},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17346},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Information Content of Krylov Observables: A Machine Learning Approach
AU  - Ritam Basu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.17346
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17346
AB  - We employ machine learning techniques to estimate the amount of information contained in three Krylov-space observables: the spread complexity C(t), the discrete Wigner negativity N(t), and the normalized negativity χ(t)=N(t)/|S(t)|, where S(t) is the survival amplitude. We study thermofield-double evolutions on GUE, GOE and Poisson spectra, and on the integrable SL(2,R) Krylov chain of a two-dimensional CFT primary, with Lanczos coefficients b_n=α√(n(n+2h−1)). To introduce chaos we add a GUE random matrix to the integrable chain, H(ε)=H_SL(2,R)+ε R_0 W_GUE, where R_0 is its spectral half-width. Either C(t) or N(t) alone determines the thermofield temperature, with R^2≃0.999. However, neither can reconstruct the fine structure of the spectral form factor. In the integrable sector all three observables carry the same information. When we turn on chaos an asymmetry appears: χ predicts C better than C predicts χ. This gap grows from +0.33 to +0.77, while the same gap for the raw negativity decays to zero. The extra information comes from the survival amplitude, and χ(t) carries it while C(t) can still be recovered from χ(t). We derive a lower bound on this gap, set by the fraction of the variance of χ that comes from S.
ER  -