Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Family and informal caregivers’ acceptance, concerns and expectations regarding artificial intelligence-enabled dementia care: a protocol for qualitative evidence synthesis

  1. 1School of Nursing, Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, China
  2. 2Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into dementia care to support assessment, monitoring, decision-making and personalized care. However, the successful implementation of AI-enabled dementia care depends not only on technological capabilities but also on the acceptance, trust and engagement of family and informal caregivers. Existing qualitative evidence remains fragmented and has not comprehensively synthesized caregivers’ perspectives regarding AI-enabled dementia care. This qualitative evidence synthesis aims to address this gap by exploring caregivers’ acceptance, concerns and expectations. Methods and analysis: This qualitative evidence synthesis will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for qualitative systematic reviews and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Studies will be identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science from database inception to December 2026. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring family and informal caregivers’ perspectives, experiences, acceptance, concerns or expectations regarding AI-enabled dementia care will be included. Study selection and methodological quality appraisal using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted using a predefined form and synthesized using Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis approach. Confidence in the review findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD420261470957.

Related

  1. Patient expectations for artificial intelligence transparency and agency: A qualitative study and proportionate framework for clinical artificial intelligence implementation
    Guy Stein, Abinav R. Udaiyar, David Bouslov +2
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyNeurosciencePLOSPMC
  2. Perceived GenAI competency and university teachers’ intention to continue using generative artificial intelligence: Extending the technology acceptance model
    Qiusu Wang
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  3. Toward Enactive Artificial Intelligence
    Banafsheh Rafiee, R Sutton
    arXiv (Cornell University)PreprintLicence not statedFull text6 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  4. Growing up with artificial intelligence: An amplifier of inequalities and a public health issue
    Théo Mouhoud, Thierry Baubet
    L'EncéphalePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  5. Notification: Artificial Intelligence in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Face, Voice, and Text Analysis Methods.
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026family,
  title = {{Family and informal caregivers’ acceptance, concerns and expectations regarding artificial intelligence-enabled dementia care: a protocol for qualitative evidence synthesis}},
  author = {Fang Wang and Jianqiong Li and Yingjie Shen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360163},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360163},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Family and informal caregivers’ acceptance, concerns and expectations regarding artificial intelligence-enabled dementia care: a protocol for qualitative evidence synthesis
AU  - Fang Wang
AU  - Jianqiong Li
AU  - Yingjie Shen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360163
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360163
AB  - Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into dementia care to support assessment, monitoring, decision-making and personalized care. However, the successful implementation of AI-enabled dementia care depends not only on technological capabilities but also on the acceptance, trust and engagement of family and informal caregivers. Existing qualitative evidence remains fragmented and has not comprehensively synthesized caregivers’ perspectives regarding AI-enabled dementia care. This qualitative evidence synthesis aims to address this gap by exploring caregivers’ acceptance, concerns and expectations. Methods and analysis: This qualitative evidence synthesis will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for qualitative systematic reviews and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Studies will be identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science from database inception to December 2026. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring family and informal caregivers’ perspectives, experiences, acceptance, concerns or expectations regarding AI-enabled dementia care will be included. Study selection and methodological quality appraisal using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted using a predefined form and synthesized using Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis approach. Confidence in the review findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD420261470957.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -