Equity in access through a digital hospital appointment system: a reflexive thematic analysis of frontline registration staff perspectives in Türkiye
- 1Department of Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University , ,
- 2Department of Health Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University , ,
Abstract
Introduction: Digital appointment systems increasingly mediate access to healthcare. However, not all individuals benefit equally from these systems, and the experiences of the frontline staff responsible for operating them remain underexplored. This qualitative study examined how hospital registration staff perceive access inequities, exercise discretion when formal procedures fail to meet patients’ needs, and understand equality and equity.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 frontline registration staff working in two public hospitals in Central Anatolia, Türkiye. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, combining semantic and latent interpretation. Coding was conducted primarily in a data-driven manner, while the multidimensional model of access, street-level bureaucracy theory, and a social justice perspective informed the analytical interpretation.
Results: The analysis generated five interconnected themes. The findings indicate that formally equal access to the appointment system does not translate into substantively equal opportunities to obtain care. Differences in digital proficiency, social support, transportation access, and temporal flexibility shape patients’ ability to navigate the system, while social connections may provide additional informal access advantages. Staff exercise discretion to assist patients when formal procedures prove insufficient. However, such assistance may make access dependent on staff members’ willingness and capacity to intervene, as well as on organisational approval and available resources. Support for disadvantaged patients is commonly understood not as an institutional right but as an act of conscience and humanity.
Discussion: Overall, the findings reveal a process of conscience-based repair of structurally unequal access: staff attempt to reduce inequities through individual efforts, while the underlying structural conditions remain unchanged. When equitable access is not institutionally guaranteed, responsibility for compensating for these inequalities is partly transferred to frontline staff. Transparent, consistent, and rights-based institutional arrangements are therefore needed to ensure equitable access.
Related
- Keeping care alive in 2025-26 humanitarian Somalia: routine digital data and frontline and managerial perspectives on integrated services
- Maintaining routine inpatient safety under prolonged armed conflict: an institutional case study of a frontline civilian hospital
- Population-wide implementation of comprehensive cancer registration in Germany—overview article on current status quo and future perspectives
- Assessing the prevalence of risk factors not included in the EuroSCORE II and their impact on hospital benchmarking in cardiac surgery: using the Netherlands Heart Registration as an example
- Virtual and In-Person Psychiatric Care: Appointment Completion and Capacity Use in a Public Mental Health Service in Peru
BibTeX
@article{akıncı2026equity,
title = {{Equity in access through a digital hospital appointment system: a reflexive thematic analysis of frontline registration staff perspectives in Türkiye}},
author = {Habibullah Akıncı and Sema Dalkılıç},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1958637},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13690947},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Equity in access through a digital hospital appointment system: a reflexive thematic analysis of frontline registration staff perspectives in Türkiye
AU - Habibullah Akıncı
AU - Sema Dalkılıç
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1958637
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13690947
AB - Introduction: Digital appointment systems increasingly mediate access to healthcare. However, not all individuals benefit equally from these systems, and the experiences of the frontline staff responsible for operating them remain underexplored. This qualitative study examined how hospital registration staff perceive access inequities, exercise discretion when formal procedures fail to meet patients’ needs, and understand equality and equity. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 frontline registration staff working in two public hospitals in Central Anatolia, Türkiye. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, combining semantic and latent interpretation. Coding was conducted primarily in a data-driven manner, while the multidimensional model of access, street-level bureaucracy theory, and a social justice perspective informed the analytical interpretation. Results: The analysis generated five interconnected themes. The findings indicate that formally equal access to the appointment system does not translate into substantively equal opportunities to obtain care. Differences in digital proficiency, social support, transportation access, and temporal flexibility shape patients’ ability to navigate the system, while social connections may provide additional informal access advantages. Staff exercise discretion to assist patients when formal procedures prove insufficient. However, such assistance may make access dependent on staff members’ willingness and capacity to intervene, as well as on organisational approval and available resources. Support for disadvantaged patients is commonly understood not as an institutional right but as an act of conscience and humanity. Discussion: Overall, the findings reveal a process of conscience-based repair of structurally unequal access: staff attempt to reduce inequities through individual efforts, while the underlying structural conditions remain unchanged. When equitable access is not institutionally guaranteed, responsibility for compensating for these inequalities is partly transferred to frontline staff. Transparent, consistent, and rights-based institutional arrangements are therefore needed to ensure equitable access.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -