Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in oncology

Cohort-level proportions of low-grade glioma (WHO grades I-II) in mixed glioma cohorts: a single-arm meta-analysis for epidemiological benchmarking and clinical trial design.

  1. 1Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

Abstract

Background

Mixed-grade glioma surgical cohorts exhibit highly variable low-grade glioma (LGG) proportions across studies. This meta-analysis quantifies pooled LGG proportions to provide cohort-level epidemiological benchmarks for researchers, with applications in clinical trial design, health economics, and institutional benchmarking.Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis of 191 cohort studies (25,847 patients) with Grade II numerators and denominators from Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus (PRISMA 2020) used Freeman-Tukey random-effects synthesis with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments; subgroup analyses examined study design, geography, era, molecular specificity, and interventions; sensitivity analyses tested robustness.Results

The pooled LGG proportion was 57% (95% CI: 52%-61%; I²=99%; n=191). Mixed LGG/high-grade gliomas (HGG) cohorts showed 41% (32%-50%; 45 studies, 6,847 patients) versus 82% (77%-88%) in pure WHO Grade II cohorts (25 studies). Surgery-only cohorts demonstrated 46% (33%-59%) versus 86% (74%-98%) with targeted therapies, and 93% (90%-96%) in randomized controlled trials. Sensitivity analyses confirmed stability (50%-62%).Conclusion

In mixed-grade glioma cohorts, an LGG proportion approaching 60% may serve as a cohort-level epidemiological reference for understanding the historical grade composition of mixed surgical series. This meta-analysis primary value lies in applications such as clinical trial design, health economics and epidemiological modeling, and institutional benchmarking.Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261323907.

Related

  1. Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy in a Colombian Referral Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Marcela Henao-Pérez, Diana Carolina López-Medina, Alejandra Arboleda-Ramírez +2
    Neurology Research InternationalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  2. Cohort profile: the Prostate-Specific Antigen Cohort (PSA Cohort) and the Prostate Cancer Risk Cohort (ProCaRis Cohort) - cohorts based on Danish health data
    Susanne Hamborg Larsen, Jacob Hesselvig Fredsøe, Thomas Bøjer Rasmussen +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  3. Cohort-specific childhood adversity measures and incident cardiovascular disease across four ageing cohorts: analyses of childhood hunger, later-life psychosocial indicators, and life-course burden
    AnNa Dai, JinNan Yin, XuWen Zheng +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. Epidemiological, Clinical, and Etiological Profile of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Adults in Southern Morocco: A Five-Year Retrospective Study
    Rida Fatima Ezzahra, Mossaab El Mousadik, Omar Halloumi +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The Past, Present, and Future of Cutaneous Larva Migrans in Türkiye: From Selim Kurtoğlu’s 1981 Case to Current Clinical and Epidemiological Reality
    Muhammed Burak Yücel, Levent Kartal, Selim Kurtoğlu
    Journal of clinical practice and researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026cohortlevel,
  title = {{Cohort-level proportions of low-grade glioma (WHO grades I-II) in mixed glioma cohorts: a single-arm meta-analysis for epidemiological benchmarking and clinical trial design.}},
  author = {Shenao Zhang and Yawen Zheng and Yinjiao Wang and Lang Chen and Tianjun Song and Haiyan Zhang and Aihong Cao and Peng Du},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1888445},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908559},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cohort-level proportions of low-grade glioma (WHO grades I-II) in mixed glioma cohorts: a single-arm meta-analysis for epidemiological benchmarking and clinical trial design.
AU  - Shenao Zhang
AU  - Yawen Zheng
AU  - Yinjiao Wang
AU  - Lang Chen
AU  - Tianjun Song
AU  - Haiyan Zhang
AU  - Aihong Cao
AU  - Peng Du
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1888445
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908559
AB  - Background  Mixed-grade glioma surgical cohorts exhibit highly variable low-grade glioma (LGG) proportions across studies. This meta-analysis quantifies pooled LGG proportions to provide cohort-level epidemiological benchmarks for researchers, with applications in clinical trial design, health economics, and institutional benchmarking.Methods  A single-arm meta-analysis of 191 cohort studies (25,847 patients) with Grade II numerators and denominators from Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus (PRISMA 2020) used Freeman-Tukey random-effects synthesis with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments; subgroup analyses examined study design, geography, era, molecular specificity, and interventions; sensitivity analyses tested robustness.Results  The pooled LGG proportion was 57% (95% CI: 52%-61%; I²=99%; n=191). Mixed LGG/high-grade gliomas (HGG) cohorts showed 41% (32%-50%; 45 studies, 6,847 patients) versus 82% (77%-88%) in pure WHO Grade II cohorts (25 studies). Surgery-only cohorts demonstrated 46% (33%-59%) versus 86% (74%-98%) with targeted therapies, and 93% (90%-96%) in randomized controlled trials. Sensitivity analyses confirmed stability (50%-62%).Conclusion  In mixed-grade glioma cohorts, an LGG proportion approaching 60% may serve as a cohort-level epidemiological reference for understanding the historical grade composition of mixed surgical series. This meta-analysis primary value lies in applications such as clinical trial design, health economics and epidemiological modeling, and institutional benchmarking.Systematic review registration  https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261323907.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -