On Erdős Problem 767: Cycles with Chords
Abstract
For integers k≥ 1 and n≥ k+2, let gk(n) be the maximum number of edges in an n-vertex graph containing no cycle with a vertex incident with at least k chords. Erdős conjectured that gk(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) for n≥ 2k+2. Lewin found a counterexample. Bollobás later conjectured that there exists a function n(k) such that gk(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) for all n≥ n(k). Jiang confirmed this by proving the formula for all n≥3k+3 when k≥1. In this paper, we determine gk(n) completely. For all k≥1 and n≥ k+2, we prove gk(n)={⌊((k+1)n)/2⌋,max{a(n−a)+⌊(a(k+1−a))/2⌋ : a∈ℤ, ⌊ (k+1)/2⌋+1≤ a≤ k+1}}. For k≥2, we prove gk(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) when n≥ ⌈(5k+1)/2⌉, and this threshold is sharp. Our proof builds on the method developed by Ma and the second author in [Ma and Ning, 2020].
Related
- Erdös–Pósa property of cycles that are far apart
- An Erdős-Pósa theorem for induced packings of even cycles
- A near-linear Chvátal--Erdős condition for Hamilton cycles in digraphs
- Hypergraph Universality and Erdos-Posa Failure for Chromatically Rich Odd Cycles
- Linear dependencies, polynomial factors in the Duke–Erdős forbidden sunflower problem – CORRIGENDUM
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026erdős,
title = {{On Erdős Problem 767: Cycles with Chords}},
author = {Xiaozheng Chen and Bo Ning},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.15330},
eprint = {2609.15330},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15330},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On Erdős Problem 767: Cycles with Chords
AU - Xiaozheng Chen
AU - Bo Ning
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.15330
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15330
AB - For integers k≥ 1 and n≥ k+2, let g_k(n) be the maximum number of edges in an n-vertex graph containing no cycle with a vertex incident with at least k chords. Erdős conjectured that g_k(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) for n≥ 2k+2. Lewin found a counterexample. Bollobás later conjectured that there exists a function n(k) such that g_k(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) for all n≥ n(k). Jiang confirmed this by proving the formula for all n≥3k+3 when k≥1. In this paper, we determine g_k(n) completely. For all k≥1 and n≥ k+2, we prove g_k(n)={⌊((k+1)n)/2⌋,max{a(n−a)+⌊(a(k+1−a))/2⌋ : a∈ℤ, ⌊ (k+1)/2⌋+1≤ a≤ k+1}}. For k≥2, we prove g_k(n)=(k+1)(n−k−1) when n≥ ⌈(5k+1)/2⌉, and this threshold is sharp. Our proof builds on the method developed by Ma and the second author in [Ma and Ning, 2020].
ER -