Effectiveness of nurse-led hypertension interventions on retention, adherence, and blood pressure control among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
5 affiliations
- 1Public Health Research, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
- 2Excellent Center for Public Health Research: EC for PHR, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
- 3South Ethiopia Region Public Health Institute, Jinka, Southern Regional State, Ethiopia
- 4School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
- 5Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Hypertension affects more than 1.28 billion adults globally and remains the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, renal failure, and premature death. This burden is inconsistently distributed across Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), where nearly three-quarters of adults live with hypertension. This gap is largely driven by poor adherence and low retention. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions on retention in care, medication adherence, and blood pressure among adult patients with hypertension in primary health care settings in LMICs. Methods: The protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD420251136515) following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane for articles published between 2000 and 2026. Eligibility criteria included: adults (≥18 years) with hypertension receiving care from primary care clinics; nurse-led interventions; usual care as comparator; primary outcome: retention rates; secondary outcomes: medication adherence, blood pressure (BP) control. Inclusion: experimental, quasi-experimental, and prospective cohort studies. Dual independent screening and data extraction were performed. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2(RoB2) for randomized controlled trials and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools for quasi-experimental and observational studies. Due to heterogeneity in intervention duration, outcome measures, and follow-up periods, a narrative synthesis was employed. Results: Eleven unique studies (n = 19,005) were identified: 63.6% RCTs, 18.2% quasi-experimental, and 18.2% observational. Seven studies were conducted in Africa and four in Asia. The mean age range was 52.0–67.4 years; 51.3%−76.0% were female. Risk-of-bias assessment revealed high or unclear risk in the missing outcomes data domain for most RCTs. Ten studies used multicomponent interventions. Retention rates varied with appointment attendance (12.6–96.5%), routine clinical retention (27.0–62.8%), and study completion of follow-up (83.8% to 97.2%). Four studies reported medication adherence with varying effects in the intervention group compared to the control or baseline. Ten studies reported systolic blood pressure (SBP) outcomes; 9 reported mean SBP after intervention; the majority reported the mean reduction of SBP was greater than 10 mmHg. Nine studies reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) outcomes; all studies reported a reduction in DBP after the intervention, with a range of −1.8 mmHg to −20.6 mmHg. Reported SBP and DBP reductions included both within-group controlled estimates; these should not be interpreted as a pooled effect. Conclusion: This systematic review included 11 studies that showed nurse-led interventions improved blood pressure control in primary health care facilities of LMICs. But retention in care showed substantial variability in nurse-led interventions in primary health care facilities of LMICs. Nurse-led interventions in LMICs are a promising strategy for improving blood pressure control. However, retention in care was substantially and variably due to heterogeneous definitions and evidence on medication adherence was limited. Future research should prioritize standardized outcome measures and robust study designs to strengthen the evidence base and inform sustainable scale-up of these models in LMICs.
Related
- Effectiveness of a pharmacy-led personalised intervention program aimed at improving adherence to oral diabetes and/or hypertension medication in people with type 2 diabetes
- Effectiveness of behavioral interventions on knowledge, attitude, and adherence to prenatal Multiple Micro-nutrients Suplement among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a post-test only cluster randomized controlled trial
- Effectiveness of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization-based interventions for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BibTeX
@article{yakob2026effectiveness,
title = {{Effectiveness of nurse-led hypertension interventions on retention, adherence, and blood pressure control among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review}},
author = {Tagese Yakob and Charuai Suwanbamrung and Cua Ngoc Le and Abebe Sorsa Badacho and Udomsak Saengow},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0362190},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362190},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effectiveness of nurse-led hypertension interventions on retention, adherence, and blood pressure control among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
AU - Tagese Yakob
AU - Charuai Suwanbamrung
AU - Cua Ngoc Le
AU - Abebe Sorsa Badacho
AU - Udomsak Saengow
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0362190
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0362190
AB - Background: Hypertension affects more than 1.28 billion adults globally and remains the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, renal failure, and premature death. This burden is inconsistently distributed across Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), where nearly three-quarters of adults live with hypertension. This gap is largely driven by poor adherence and low retention. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions on retention in care, medication adherence, and blood pressure among adult patients with hypertension in primary health care settings in LMICs. Methods: The protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD420251136515) following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane for articles published between 2000 and 2026. Eligibility criteria included: adults (≥18 years) with hypertension receiving care from primary care clinics; nurse-led interventions; usual care as comparator; primary outcome: retention rates; secondary outcomes: medication adherence, blood pressure (BP) control. Inclusion: experimental, quasi-experimental, and prospective cohort studies. Dual independent screening and data extraction were performed. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2(RoB2) for randomized controlled trials and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools for quasi-experimental and observational studies. Due to heterogeneity in intervention duration, outcome measures, and follow-up periods, a narrative synthesis was employed. Results: Eleven unique studies (n = 19,005) were identified: 63.6% RCTs, 18.2% quasi-experimental, and 18.2% observational. Seven studies were conducted in Africa and four in Asia. The mean age range was 52.0–67.4 years; 51.3%−76.0% were female. Risk-of-bias assessment revealed high or unclear risk in the missing outcomes data domain for most RCTs. Ten studies used multicomponent interventions. Retention rates varied with appointment attendance (12.6–96.5%), routine clinical retention (27.0–62.8%), and study completion of follow-up (83.8% to 97.2%). Four studies reported medication adherence with varying effects in the intervention group compared to the control or baseline. Ten studies reported systolic blood pressure (SBP) outcomes; 9 reported mean SBP after intervention; the majority reported the mean reduction of SBP was greater than 10 mmHg. Nine studies reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) outcomes; all studies reported a reduction in DBP after the intervention, with a range of −1.8 mmHg to −20.6 mmHg. Reported SBP and DBP reductions included both within-group controlled estimates; these should not be interpreted as a pooled effect. Conclusion: This systematic review included 11 studies that showed nurse-led interventions improved blood pressure control in primary health care facilities of LMICs. But retention in care showed substantial variability in nurse-led interventions in primary health care facilities of LMICs. Nurse-led interventions in LMICs are a promising strategy for improving blood pressure control. However, retention in care was substantially and variably due to heterogeneous definitions and evidence on medication adherence was limited. Future research should prioritize standardized outcome measures and robust study designs to strengthen the evidence base and inform sustainable scale-up of these models in LMICs.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -