Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Market Making on Prediction-Market Order Books

Abstract

A market maker provides liquidity by quoting prices to buy and sell an asset, earning the spread while managing inventory risk. We study market makers trained with multi-agent reinforcement learning on prediction markets, specifically Polymarket, whose thin order books pose distinct challenges. Three challenges underpin this research: adverse selection may cause a policy trained on real data to stop quoting; the consequences of a quote can arrive many steps after the action; and prediction-market L2 data does not identify individual orders needed for simulation. We address these challenges by reconstructing order-level LOBSTER-format data from Polymarket and training agents in JaxMARL-HFT on 417 real markets. We enrich the baseline market maker's observation space with the book and recent flow, redesign its actions and inventory controls, and propose a cooperative multi-agent decomposition into a quoter and a risk manager trained using recurrent Independent Proximal Policy Optimisation (IPPO) with RNN policies. We investigate reward shaping, particularly reward blending and post-fill markout, to mitigate credit-assignment difficulties between the agents. Our redesigned single-agent market maker quotes more frequently and incurs smaller held-out losses than the retrained JaxMARL-HFT baseline, although the contributions of jointly changed observations, actions and risk constraints are not separately identified. Decomposition alone performs poorly; careful reward design substantially improves the desk relative to the unshaped split and yields our best result. Models are evaluated on realised end-of-episode portfolio value on held-out markets. None establishes positive average portfolio value in periodic held-out evaluation, and each configuration was trained with one seed. The environment, data and protocol lay a foundation for makers that quote many linked markets at once.

Related

  1. Signature Methods for Optimal Market Making
    Alberto Gennaro, Thibaut Mastrolia, Francesca Primavera
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Tail reliability in probabilistic electricity price forecasts: comparing model combination and conformal prediction in the GB day-ahead market
    Anirudh Agrawal, Aidan O'Sullivan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Two-Way Price Discovery Between a Cryptocurrency-Based Prediction Market and Federal Funds Futures: Evidence from FOMC Decisions
    Marcus Alexis Giannopoulos, Giovanni Millo
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  4. Learning-Accelerated Optimization-based Trajectory Planning for Cooperative Aerial-Ground Handover Missions
    Jingshan Chen, Bochen Yu, Henrik Ebel +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Bi-HYCO: Bi-Objective Cooperative Learning for PDE Parameter Identification under Fragmented Observations
    Umberto Biccari, Jun Chen, Roberto Morales +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lejmi2026cooperative,
  title = {{Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Market Making on Prediction-Market Order Books}},
  author = {Skander Lejmi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.26789},
  eprint = {2610.26789},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26789},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Market Making on Prediction-Market Order Books
AU  - Skander Lejmi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26789
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26789
AB  - A market maker provides liquidity by quoting prices to buy and sell an asset, earning the spread while managing inventory risk. We study market makers trained with multi-agent reinforcement learning on prediction markets, specifically Polymarket, whose thin order books pose distinct challenges. Three challenges underpin this research: adverse selection may cause a policy trained on real data to stop quoting; the consequences of a quote can arrive many steps after the action; and prediction-market L2 data does not identify individual orders needed for simulation. We address these challenges by reconstructing order-level LOBSTER-format data from Polymarket and training agents in JaxMARL-HFT on 417 real markets. We enrich the baseline market maker's observation space with the book and recent flow, redesign its actions and inventory controls, and propose a cooperative multi-agent decomposition into a quoter and a risk manager trained using recurrent Independent Proximal Policy Optimisation (IPPO) with RNN policies. We investigate reward shaping, particularly reward blending and post-fill markout, to mitigate credit-assignment difficulties between the agents. Our redesigned single-agent market maker quotes more frequently and incurs smaller held-out losses than the retrained JaxMARL-HFT baseline, although the contributions of jointly changed observations, actions and risk constraints are not separately identified. Decomposition alone performs poorly; careful reward design substantially improves the desk relative to the unshaped split and yields our best result. Models are evaluated on realised end-of-episode portfolio value on held-out markets. None establishes positive average portfolio value in periodic held-out evaluation, and each configuration was trained with one seed. The environment, data and protocol lay a foundation for makers that quote many linked markets at once.
ER  -