Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Keep the discussion going! Our response to Nielsen’s comment

  • Anders Högberg
  • Kristian Brink
  • Torbjörn Brorsson
  • Helena Malmström
  • Elisabeth Rudebeck
  • Miguel de Navascués
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

Highlights: • Continuous critical dialogues. • Plurality is informative. • Demographic inference is model‑dependent. • Methodological choices shape interpretative outcomes. Abstract: This article offers a response to Nielsen’s commentary on the authors’ earlier study Variation in the number of radiocarbon (14C) dates does not equal change in Neolithic population size over time. Clarifying some misunderstandings in Nielsen’s commentary, the authors emphasise the value in continuous critical dialogues in advancing archaeological research on prehistoric demography.

Related

  1. Response to comment on “Using genomic data and machine learning to predict antibiotic resistance: A tutorial paper”
    Lucy Moctezuma Tan, Faye Orcales, Pleuni Pennings
    PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsMicrobiologyHALPLOS
  2. When the going gets tough, the dove gets going: feral pigeons maintain nest attendance rates during food shortages with asymmetrical biparental care
    Brandon Mak, Mira Julie Chaban, Edward Drewitt +2
    Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  3. Hiboù: keep an eye on biodiversity
    Antoine Savoie, Victoria Félix
    NOV'AE - Numéros spéciauxPeer-reviewedCC BY-SA 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Seaweed carbon removal cannot keep up with climate-driven loss
    Karen Filbee-Dexter, Albert Pessarrodona, Kira A. Krumhansl +1
    PLOS BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyClimate sciencePLOS
  5. Going beyond labels: Semi-supervised learning for enzyme kinetic parameter prediction
    A. Malli, D. Vasyutyn, A. Majumder +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{hogberg2026keep,
  title = {{Keep the discussion going! Our response to Nielsen’s comment}},
  author = {Anders Högberg and Kristian Brink and Torbjörn Brorsson and Helena Malmström and Elisabeth Rudebeck and Miguel de Navascués},
  journal = {Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105894},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05683577v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Keep the discussion going! Our response to Nielsen’s comment
AU  - Anders Högberg
AU  - Kristian Brink
AU  - Torbjörn Brorsson
AU  - Helena Malmström
AU  - Elisabeth Rudebeck
AU  - Miguel de Navascués
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/13
JO  - Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105894
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05683577v1
AB  - Highlights: • Continuous critical dialogues. • Plurality is informative. • Demographic inference is model‑dependent. • Methodological choices shape interpretative outcomes. Abstract: This article offers a response to Nielsen’s commentary on the authors’ earlier study Variation in the number of radiocarbon (14C) dates does not equal change in Neolithic population size over time. Clarifying some misunderstandings in Nielsen’s commentary, the authors emphasise the value in continuous critical dialogues in advancing archaeological research on prehistoric demography.
SN  - 2352-409X
SN  - 2352-4103
ER  -