Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Effectiveness of Single-Session Interventions (SSIs) for Anxiety and Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Objective: Single-session interventions (SSIs) have been proposed as a scalable approach to reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms; however, evidence for adults remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SSIs relative to inactive or minimal-control conditions. Method: A systematic search identified adult RCTs. Outcomes were analyzed separately for anxiety and depression using three-level random-effects meta-analytic models. Effects were pooled across 1–13 weeks and within short-term (1–3 weeks) and medium-term (4–13 weeks) follow-up windows. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (N = 7,035) contributed 53 outcome-level effect sizes. Across 1–13 weeks, SSIs were associated with significant reductions in anxiety symptoms (g = −0.66, 95% CI [−0.98, −0.34]) and depressive symptoms (g = −0.49, 95% CI [−0.84, −0.13]). At 1–3 weeks, effects were significant for anxiety symptoms (g = −0.80, 95% CI [−1.24, −0.36]), but not depressive symptoms (g = −0.78, 95% CI [−1.78, 0.22]). At 4–13 weeks, effects were significant for both depressive symptoms (g = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.55, −0.02]) and anxiety symptoms (g = −0.48, 95% CI [−0.93, −0.02]). Heterogeneity was high, prediction intervals were wide, publication bias was detected for anxiety outcomes at 1–13 and 1–3 weeks and for depression at 1–13 weeks, and most studies had some concerns or high risk of bias. Conclusions: SSIs may reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms over the short-to-medium term in adults. Substantial heterogeneity, limited trial availability, publication bias, and risk of bias constrain confidence in the magnitude and generalizability of these effects. Rigorous trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify effect durability and further inform the role within routine care.

Keywords: anxiety, depression, meta-analysis, single-session interventions, systematic review

Related

  1. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Fatigue in Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Yanze Bi, Bo Yang, Siyu Chen +6
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  2. Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions on Stress and Functional Capacity Among Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Neena Vir Singh, Raman Kalia, Amarjeet Singh +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Effectiveness of behavioral interventions on knowledge, attitude, and adherence to prenatal Multiple Micro-nutrients Suplement among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a post-test only cluster randomized controlled trial
    Tolasa Yadate, Ephrem Lejore, Tenagnework Eseyneh Dagnaw +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
  4. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hao Luo, Guoqing Zhang, Lingyun Long +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of WHO psychological interventions for migrant populations resettled in Italy: study protocol for the ADVANCE hybrid type-I randomized controlled trial
    Marianna Purgato, Federico Tedeschi, Eleonora Prina +27
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{nas2026effectiveness,
  title = {{Effectiveness of Single-Session Interventions (SSIs) for Anxiety and Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials}},
  author = {Nursima Nas and Metta Rahmadiana and Ponti, N. de (Nino) and Clara Miguel and Davide Papola and Eirini Karyotaki and Jessica L. Schleider and Mathias Harrer and Pim Cuijpers and Stashower, S.E. (Sarah)},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/q5byw_v2},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/q5byw_v2/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Effectiveness of Single-Session Interventions (SSIs) for Anxiety and Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
AU  - Nursima Nas
AU  - Metta Rahmadiana
AU  - Ponti, N. de (Nino)
AU  - Clara Miguel
AU  - Davide Papola
AU  - Eirini Karyotaki
AU  - Jessica L. Schleider
AU  - Mathias Harrer
AU  - Pim Cuijpers
AU  - Stashower, S.E. (Sarah)
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/q5byw_v2
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/q5byw_v2/
AB  - Objective: Single-session interventions (SSIs) have been proposed as a scalable approach to reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms; however, evidence for adults remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SSIs relative to inactive or minimal-control conditions. Method: A systematic search identified adult RCTs. Outcomes were analyzed separately for anxiety and depression using three-level random-effects meta-analytic models. Effects were pooled across 1–13 weeks and within short-term (1–3 weeks) and medium-term (4–13 weeks) follow-up windows. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (N = 7,035) contributed 53 outcome-level effect sizes. Across 1–13 weeks, SSIs were associated with significant reductions in anxiety symptoms (g = −0.66, 95% CI [−0.98, −0.34]) and depressive symptoms (g = −0.49, 95% CI [−0.84, −0.13]). At 1–3 weeks, effects were significant for anxiety symptoms (g = −0.80, 95% CI [−1.24, −0.36]), but not depressive symptoms (g = −0.78, 95% CI [−1.78, 0.22]). At 4–13 weeks, effects were significant for both depressive symptoms (g = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.55, −0.02]) and anxiety symptoms (g = −0.48, 95% CI [−0.93, −0.02]). Heterogeneity was high, prediction intervals were wide, publication bias was detected for anxiety outcomes at 1–13 and 1–3 weeks and for depression at 1–13 weeks, and most studies had some concerns or high risk of bias. Conclusions: SSIs may reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms over the short-to-medium term in adults. Substantial heterogeneity, limited trial availability, publication bias, and risk of bias constrain confidence in the magnitude and generalizability of these effects. Rigorous trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify effect durability and further inform the role within routine care.  Keywords: anxiety, depression, meta-analysis, single-session interventions, systematic review
ER  -