Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Case Reports in Surgery

FloSeal Related Small Bowel Obstruction: A Word of Caution

5 affiliations
  1. 1Adelaide University Adelaide South Australia Australia adelaide.edu.au
  2. 2Grampians Health Ballarat Victoria Australia
  3. 3Grampians Research Initiative Ballarat Victoria Australia
  4. 4Deakin University Ballarat Victoria Australia deakin.edu.au
  5. 5University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

Topical haemostatic agents such as FloSeal are widely used to manage low‐grade bleeding in areas where conventional haemostatic techniques may risk damage to critical structures or are unsuccessful. While effective, these agents can cause unexpected complications. This case report highlights small bowel obstruction (SBO) as a rare but important adverse outcome following FloSeal use in colorectal surgery. A 55‐year‐old male underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for hepatic flexure adenocarcinoma. Due to raw surface oozing near Gerota’s fascia and proximity to the duodenum, FloSeal was applied intra‐operatively. On postoperative day 3, the patient developed nausea, absent flatus and bowel sounds and a rising C‐reactive protein (CRP) (366 mg/L), progressing to 540 mg/L by day 4. CT imaging showed ileus with an intact anastomosis and no closed‐loop features. Exploratory laparotomy identified a transition point where the distal ileum was adhered to residual FloSeal, resulting in a high‐grade obstruction. Following adhesiolysis and irrigation, the patient recovered uneventfully. Normal lactate and a negative septic screen argued against bacterial translocation with systemic sepsis as the driver of the CRP rise, suggesting instead a localised inflammatory response to mechanical obstruction. We frame this as a preventable, surgical technique‐related complication rather than an intrinsic hazard of FloSeal, arising from a deliberate deviation from manufacturer instructions to remove excess material. Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for SBO in patients with rising CRP and no radiological leak, and should clearly document whenever haemostatic material is deliberately retained.

Related

  1. Association of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction with Postoperative Health-related Quality of Life after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.
    Jingxiao Fu, Yuta Yamamoto, Masato Kitazawa +9
    Journal of the anus, rectum and colonPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMCDOAJ
  2. A Rare Cause of Pediatric Small Bowel Obstruction: Congenital Rectouterine Hernia
    Aditya Kotla, Brandon C Toliver, Alan F Utria
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Assessment of ischemia in mechanical small bowel obstruction: The time has come for dual-energy CT
    Marc Zins, Julien Frandon, Ingrid Millet
    Diagnostic and Interventional ImagingPeer-reviewedLicence not stated4 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  4. Case Report: Immune checkpoint inhibitor–induced hypophysitis presenting as acute paralytic ileus mimicking mechanical bowel obstruction in a patient affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Alice Baggi, Anna Adriani, Luca Carlofrancesco Ammoni +6
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. Beyond the bowel: Computed tomography (CT) Scan identification of intraperitoneal bladder perforation causing mechanical small bowel obstruction
    Greg Samuels, Gloria Tshimbidi, Peter Aclavio +2
    Urology Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{carmichael2026floseal,
  title = {{FloSeal Related Small Bowel Obstruction: A Word of Caution}},
  author = {Gavin J. Carmichael and Jessica E. Hanna and Daniel Ng Ying Kin and Mathew O. Jacob},
  journal = {Case Reports in Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1155/cris/1127650},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/cris/1127650},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - FloSeal Related Small Bowel Obstruction: A Word of Caution
AU  - Gavin J. Carmichael
AU  - Jessica E. Hanna
AU  - Daniel Ng Ying Kin
AU  - Mathew O. Jacob
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Case Reports in Surgery
DO  - 10.1155/cris/1127650
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1155/cris/1127650
AB  - Topical haemostatic agents such as FloSeal are widely used to manage low‐grade bleeding in areas where conventional haemostatic techniques may risk damage to critical structures or are unsuccessful. While effective, these agents can cause unexpected complications. This case report highlights small bowel obstruction (SBO) as a rare but important adverse outcome following FloSeal use in colorectal surgery. A 55‐year‐old male underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for hepatic flexure adenocarcinoma. Due to raw surface oozing near Gerota’s fascia and proximity to the duodenum, FloSeal was applied intra‐operatively. On postoperative day 3, the patient developed nausea, absent flatus and bowel sounds and a rising C‐reactive protein (CRP) (366 mg/L), progressing to 540 mg/L by day 4. CT imaging showed ileus with an intact anastomosis and no closed‐loop features. Exploratory laparotomy identified a transition point where the distal ileum was adhered to residual FloSeal, resulting in a high‐grade obstruction. Following adhesiolysis and irrigation, the patient recovered uneventfully. Normal lactate and a negative septic screen argued against bacterial translocation with systemic sepsis as the driver of the CRP rise, suggesting instead a localised inflammatory response to mechanical obstruction. We frame this as a preventable, surgical technique‐related complication rather than an intrinsic hazard of FloSeal, arising from a deliberate deviation from manufacturer instructions to remove excess material. Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for SBO in patients with rising CRP and no radiological leak, and should clearly document whenever haemostatic material is deliberately retained.
SN  - 2090-6900
SN  - 2090-6919
ER  -