Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,273 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Associations Between Parental and Child Food Neophobia and Children’s Eating Behavior and Psychological Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis of South Korean Parent–Child Dyads

5 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
  2. 2Addiction Policy Lab, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
  3. 3Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland
  4. 4Department of Psychiatry, Nowon Eulji University Hospital, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Seoul 01830, Republic of Korea
  5. 5Eulji Psychiatry and Medical Science Center, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric eating behavior and psychological adjustment may be related to family food-related attitudes. This cross-sectional study examined associations between parental and child food neophobia (FN) in South Korean parent–child dyads and evaluated whether child FN statistically mediated associations between parental FN and child eating-behavior and psychological-symptom indicators. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 300 parent–child dyads aged 6–12 years recruited through community mental health and counseling centers. Parent-reported FN, CEBQ indicators, and PSC-17 symptoms were analyzed using multivariable linear regression and 5000-resample bias-corrected bootstrap mediation models. Results: Parental FN was positively associated with parent-reported child FN (B = 0.31, 95% CI 0.21–0.42). In the mutually adjusted PSC-17 model, parental FN (B = 1.09, 95% CI 0.26–1.93) and child FN (B = 0.80, 95% CI −0.02–1.62) showed positive associations with PSC-17 Total; the child-FN association was not conventionally statistically significant (p = 0.056). The bootstrap indirect association through child FN was B = 0.212 (95% bias-corrected bootstrap CI 0.015–0.468). For the exploratory CEBQ Total, the corresponding indirect association was B = −0.706 (95% bias-corrected bootstrap CI −1.142 to −0.334). Conclusions: The findings indicate cross-sectional associations and statistically detectable indirect associations, but they do not establish temporal transmission or causality. Longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to determine whether these patterns are reproducible and temporally ordered.

Related

  1. A moderated mediation model of the association between parental psychological control and internalizing problems among college students
    Wenmin Li, Jin Meng, Yiqi Liu
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  2. Cross-sectional correlates and indirect associations linking parental warmth to scores on a study-specific gaming-related symptom index in senior-high-school and university students
    Ruoyu Zhou, Wenjie Yang, Haotian Gao +1
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. Associations between early antidepressant exposure, affective states, and subjective sleep quality among euthymic depressive-onset bipolar patients: a cross-sectional parallel mediation analysis
    Jing Ma, Shiming Liang, Mingjin Wang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. Psychological Inflexibility and Suicidal Ideation in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Multiple Mediation Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Insomnia, and Generalized Anxiety.
    Jonatan Baños-Chaparro, Juan Artica-Martinez, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez
    European journal of investigation in health, psychology and educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Associations of Mediterranean Diet Adherence with Cardiometabolic Outcomes, Psychological Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults Attending Primary Care Centres in Navarra, Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Julieth Paola Sulaiman Rojas, José Abellán Alemán, Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas +17
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{lee2026associations,
  title = {{Associations Between Parental and Child Food Neophobia and Children’s Eating Behavior and Psychological Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis of South Korean Parent–Child Dyads}},
  author = {Mi-Sun Lee and Kazimierz Wilkoszewski and Natalia Ziółkowska and Soo-Young Bhang and Kamilla Bargiel-Matusiewicz},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18213494},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3494},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Associations Between Parental and Child Food Neophobia and Children’s Eating Behavior and Psychological Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis of South Korean Parent–Child Dyads
AU  - Mi-Sun Lee
AU  - Kazimierz Wilkoszewski
AU  - Natalia Ziółkowska
AU  - Soo-Young Bhang
AU  - Kamilla Bargiel-Matusiewicz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18213494
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3494
AB  - Objectives: Pediatric eating behavior and psychological adjustment may be related to family food-related attitudes. This cross-sectional study examined associations between parental and child food neophobia (FN) in South Korean parent–child dyads and evaluated whether child FN statistically mediated associations between parental FN and child eating-behavior and psychological-symptom indicators. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 300 parent–child dyads aged 6–12 years recruited through community mental health and counseling centers. Parent-reported FN, CEBQ indicators, and PSC-17 symptoms were analyzed using multivariable linear regression and 5000-resample bias-corrected bootstrap mediation models. Results: Parental FN was positively associated with parent-reported child FN (B = 0.31, 95% CI 0.21–0.42). In the mutually adjusted PSC-17 model, parental FN (B = 1.09, 95% CI 0.26–1.93) and child FN (B = 0.80, 95% CI −0.02–1.62) showed positive associations with PSC-17 Total; the child-FN association was not conventionally statistically significant (p = 0.056). The bootstrap indirect association through child FN was B = 0.212 (95% bias-corrected bootstrap CI 0.015–0.468). For the exploratory CEBQ Total, the corresponding indirect association was B = −0.706 (95% bias-corrected bootstrap CI −1.142 to −0.334). Conclusions: The findings indicate cross-sectional associations and statistically detectable indirect associations, but they do not establish temporal transmission or causality. Longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to determine whether these patterns are reproducible and temporally ordered.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -