Competition drives excessive recruitment in collective search
Abstract
Groups that search collectively often exploit what they find by recruiting: one member directs others to a site it has found. Recruitment raises the number of members foraging at a known site, but the return per forager may fall as that number grows, so there is an intermediate optimal recruitment rate. In addition, a site may be used by more than one group. Here we analyze a model of two groups that forage from a single site whose return declines with the total number of foragers present. The two groups interact only through this shared return. The long-run outcome is either coexistence at the foraging site or monopoly by one group, and we analyze the boundary between these two outcomes. A group's best response to its rival is not monotone: it increases its own recruitment rate with the rival's recruitment rate in an attempt to preserve a monopoly, and then its recruitment rate drops discontinuously when it is no longer optimal to preserve a monopoly. We analyze how model parameters govern this shift: a group relinquishes monopoly when the site saturates at few foragers and when the rival group is small. When the two groups have comparable size there are multiple Nash equilibria, so either group may end up with the larger share. And when two equally matched groups compete, both recruit above the rate that maximizes their common return, so that each individual ends with less than it would in a single undivided group of the same total size.
Related
- Histone lactylation in fibroblast-like synoviocytes drives CXCL1-mediated immune cell recruitment in rheumatoid arthritis
- Ecology of gene drives: Organism fitness under larval competition determines gene drive performance
- How multilevel competition drives cooperation in stigmergic systems
- A PhoP-regulated type II secretion system drives bacterial competition in Serratia marcescens
- Memory strength drives hybrid search efficiency
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026competition,
title = {{Competition drives excessive recruitment in collective search}},
author = {Hyunjoong Kim and Gayashan Jayavilal and Joshua B Plotkin},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.11715},
eprint = {2609.11715},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11715},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Competition drives excessive recruitment in collective search
AU - Hyunjoong Kim
AU - Gayashan Jayavilal
AU - Joshua B Plotkin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/10
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.11715
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11715
AB - Groups that search collectively often exploit what they find by recruiting: one member directs others to a site it has found. Recruitment raises the number of members foraging at a known site, but the return per forager may fall as that number grows, so there is an intermediate optimal recruitment rate. In addition, a site may be used by more than one group. Here we analyze a model of two groups that forage from a single site whose return declines with the total number of foragers present. The two groups interact only through this shared return. The long-run outcome is either coexistence at the foraging site or monopoly by one group, and we analyze the boundary between these two outcomes. A group's best response to its rival is not monotone: it increases its own recruitment rate with the rival's recruitment rate in an attempt to preserve a monopoly, and then its recruitment rate drops discontinuously when it is no longer optimal to preserve a monopoly. We analyze how model parameters govern this shift: a group relinquishes monopoly when the site saturates at few foragers and when the rival group is small. When the two groups have comparable size there are multiple Nash equilibria, so either group may end up with the larger share. And when two equally matched groups compete, both recruit above the rate that maximizes their common return, so that each individual ends with less than it would in a single undivided group of the same total size.
ER -