Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)

The impact of group prenatal care on breastfeeding: A planned secondary analysis of the CRADLE randomized controlled trial.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Prisma Health/University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville Greenville South Carolina USA.
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Prisma Health Greenville South Carolina USA.
  3. 3Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA.
  4. 4Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles South Carolina USA.
  5. 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Illinois USA.

Abstract

Background

Despite providing both maternal and neonatal benefits, breastfeeding rates remain lower than goal targets. Prior observational studies suggest group prenatal care (GPNC) increases breastfeeding initiation compared to individual prenatal care (IPNC), but few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined how GPNC impacts breastfeeding knowledge and self-efficacy. We aimed to determine if participating in GPNC impacts breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding prevalence postpartum.Materials and methods

This is a planned secondary analysis of the Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) RCT comparing the impact of GPNC versus IPNC on preterm birth. The CRADLE trial enrolled 2350 participants and randomized them to GPNC or IPNC. Eligibility requirements included age of 14-45 years, singleton pregnancy, entering prenatal care before 21 weeks' gestation, and low-risk pregnancy by institutional standards. Questionnaires assessed breastfeeding knowledge (adapted from the Infant Feeding Practices II Survey) and self-efficacy (adapted from Wells' 20-item Prenatal Breast-feeding Self-Efficacy Scale). A per-compliance approach was used, including participants who attended at least five sessions in their assigned group. The primary outcome was breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding prevalence at the postpartum visit. Chi-square, Students' t-test, and multivariable logistic regression were applied. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted among nulliparous participants.Results

Of the 2350 participants in the CRADLE study, 1561 were included in this secondary analysis. Participants self-identified as Black (38.3%), Hispanic (24.2%), White (36.2%), or another race and ethnicity (1.3%), and the majority were multiparous. GPNC participants reported higher rates of breastfeeding at hospital discharge compared to IPNC (72.8% IPNC vs. 78.2% GPNC; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.72). GPNC participants also had greater breastfeeding knowledge, scoring higher on the composite knowledge questionnaire (score 18.5, standard deviation [SD] 4.3) compared to IPNC participants (score 17.5, SD 4.4; p < 0.001). No differences were observed in self-efficacy scores or postpartum breastfeeding rates between GPNC and IPNC participants. These findings were generally consistent for nulliparous participants; however, breastfeeding rate at hospital discharge did not differ between arms.Conclusion

GPNC increased breastfeeding knowledge and breastfeeding at hospital discharge but not breastfeeding at the postpartum visit. These findings suggest that education alone may be insufficient to create long-lasting changes in breastfeeding behavior.

Related

  1. Identification and operative vs. conservative vs. no treatment trial of breastfeeding-impeding lingual frenulum in newborn infants (LINNE): protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) embedded in a prospective observational cohort study in Northern Finland
    Stiina Aitamurto, Venla Lohi, Anu Lehtinen +2
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  2. Effectiveness of behavioral interventions on knowledge, attitude, and adherence to prenatal Multiple Micro-nutrients Suplement among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a post-test only cluster randomized controlled trial
    Tolasa Yadate, Ephrem Lejore, Tenagnework Eseyneh Dagnaw +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
  3. Effect of health literacy-based education on the self-efficacy of primiparous breastfeeding women: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zohreh Shahhosseini, Negin Kalvani, Roya Nikbakht +1
    BMC pregnancy and childbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Effect of breastfeeding counseling in rooming-in to prevent the use of artificial nipples among primiparous women: a secondary outcome of multicenter, randomized, parallel, and open-label clinical trial
    Cynthya Viana de Resende, Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz, Michele Curcino Cavalcanti +4
    BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Assessing an educational strategy to improve community health provider-led provision of cervical cancer screening services in western Kenya: A secondary analysis of the Elimisha-HPV cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Purity Chepkoech, Stephanie B. Jordan, Breandan Makhulo +5
    Global Health & MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{campbell2026impact,
  title = {{The impact of group prenatal care on breastfeeding: A planned secondary analysis of the CRADLE randomized controlled trial.}},
  author = {Alexa I K Campbell and Meghan DuBose and Jessica Britt and Moonseong Heo and Lu Zhang and Liwei Chen and Lauren Keenan-Devlin and Amy H Crockett},
  journal = {Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/pmf2.70492},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923640},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The impact of group prenatal care on breastfeeding: A planned secondary analysis of the CRADLE randomized controlled trial.
AU  - Alexa I K Campbell
AU  - Meghan DuBose
AU  - Jessica Britt
AU  - Moonseong Heo
AU  - Lu Zhang
AU  - Liwei Chen
AU  - Lauren Keenan-Devlin
AU  - Amy H Crockett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)
DO  - 10.1002/pmf2.70492
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923640
AB  - Background  Despite providing both maternal and neonatal benefits, breastfeeding rates remain lower than goal targets. Prior observational studies suggest group prenatal care (GPNC) increases breastfeeding initiation compared to individual prenatal care (IPNC), but few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined how GPNC impacts breastfeeding knowledge and self-efficacy. We aimed to determine if participating in GPNC impacts breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding prevalence postpartum.Materials and methods  This is a planned secondary analysis of the Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) RCT comparing the impact of GPNC versus IPNC on preterm birth. The CRADLE trial enrolled 2350 participants and randomized them to GPNC or IPNC. Eligibility requirements included age of 14-45 years, singleton pregnancy, entering prenatal care before 21 weeks' gestation, and low-risk pregnancy by institutional standards. Questionnaires assessed breastfeeding knowledge (adapted from the Infant Feeding Practices II Survey) and self-efficacy (adapted from Wells' 20-item Prenatal Breast-feeding Self-Efficacy Scale). A per-compliance approach was used, including participants who attended at least five sessions in their assigned group. The primary outcome was breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding prevalence at the postpartum visit. Chi-square, Students' t-test, and multivariable logistic regression were applied. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted among nulliparous participants.Results  Of the 2350 participants in the CRADLE study, 1561 were included in this secondary analysis. Participants self-identified as Black (38.3%), Hispanic (24.2%), White (36.2%), or another race and ethnicity (1.3%), and the majority were multiparous. GPNC participants reported higher rates of breastfeeding at hospital discharge compared to IPNC (72.8% IPNC vs. 78.2% GPNC; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.72). GPNC participants also had greater breastfeeding knowledge, scoring higher on the composite knowledge questionnaire (score 18.5, standard deviation [SD] 4.3) compared to IPNC participants (score 17.5, SD 4.4; p < 0.001). No differences were observed in self-efficacy scores or postpartum breastfeeding rates between GPNC and IPNC participants. These findings were generally consistent for nulliparous participants; however, breastfeeding rate at hospital discharge did not differ between arms.Conclusion  GPNC increased breastfeeding knowledge and breastfeeding at hospital discharge but not breastfeeding at the postpartum visit. These findings suggest that education alone may be insufficient to create long-lasting changes in breastfeeding behavior.
SN  - 2997-9684
ER  -