Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Hardware-Efficient Error Mitigation and Shot-Efficient Sampling on IBM Quantum Hardware

Abstract

We experimentally study error mitigation and finite-shot sampling on superconducting quantum hardware under a constrained execution budget. The study combines calibration-aware qubit selection, circuit-depth scaling, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout-error mitigation, and repeated-shot estimation on an IBM Quantum processor. Experiments are organized across ideal simulation, noise-model simulation, and physical-device execution to separate sampling uncertainty from device-induced error. We investigate how mitigation performance changes with circuit depth, effective noise scale, qubit connectivity, and measurement budget, and quantify accuracy using expectation-value error, mean-squared error, statistical uncertainty, and mitigation gain. A fixed hardware-execution budget is used to evaluate shot allocation strategies and repeated measurements without relying on unlimited sampling. The resulting analysis provides a hardware-aware characterization of when mitigation improves expectation-value estimation and when finite-shot fluctuations offset the benefit of additional mitigation overhead. The implementation uses contemporary Qiskit and IBM Quantum Runtime workflows and is designed to provide reproducible experimental evidence for error-mitigation studies on current quantum processors.

Related

  1. A hardware-efficient variational ansatz with an exact diagonal metric for real- and imaginary-time evolution and Haar sampling
    Dario Picozzi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Hardware Demonstration of Neural-Surrogated Quantum-Enhanced MCMC for Large-Scale Constrained Boltzmann Sampling
    Yuya Kawamata, Keisuke Fujii
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Hardware-Efficient Reinforcement-Learned Scheduling for Quantum LDPC Decoders
    Mohsen Moradi, Vahid Nourozi, Wei Tang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Quantum MeanFlow: single-shot generative sampling on NISQ hardware
    Ashish Joshi, Eshaan Mistry, Takahiko Koyama
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Efficient quantum state preparation on Quantinuum hardware
    Archie Butterworth, Josh Green, Yusen Wu +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chongder2026hardwareefficient,
  title = {{Hardware-Efficient Error Mitigation and Shot-Efficient Sampling on IBM Quantum Hardware}},
  author = {Sumit Chongder},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.28535},
  eprint = {2608.28535},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28535},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hardware-Efficient Error Mitigation and Shot-Efficient Sampling on IBM Quantum Hardware
AU  - Sumit Chongder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.28535
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28535
AB  - We experimentally study error mitigation and finite-shot sampling on superconducting quantum hardware under a constrained execution budget. The study combines calibration-aware qubit selection, circuit-depth scaling, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout-error mitigation, and repeated-shot estimation on an IBM Quantum processor. Experiments are organized across ideal simulation, noise-model simulation, and physical-device execution to separate sampling uncertainty from device-induced error. We investigate how mitigation performance changes with circuit depth, effective noise scale, qubit connectivity, and measurement budget, and quantify accuracy using expectation-value error, mean-squared error, statistical uncertainty, and mitigation gain. A fixed hardware-execution budget is used to evaluate shot allocation strategies and repeated measurements without relying on unlimited sampling. The resulting analysis provides a hardware-aware characterization of when mitigation improves expectation-value estimation and when finite-shot fluctuations offset the benefit of additional mitigation overhead. The implementation uses contemporary Qiskit and IBM Quantum Runtime workflows and is designed to provide reproducible experimental evidence for error-mitigation studies on current quantum processors.
ER  -