Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The Gleason--Kahane--Zelazko theorem: a gentle introduction

Abstract

After some personal recollections of Jean-Pierre Kahane, this paper gives a gentle introduction to the Gleason-Kahane-Zelazko theorem. The theorem states that a normalised complex-linear functional on a unital complex Banach algebra is multiplicative whenever it does not vanish on invertible elements. Neither continuity of the functional nor commutativity of the algebra is assumed. We give a detailed account of three proofs: the original argument of Gleason and, independently, Kahane and Zelazko; the polynomial proof of Roitman and Sternfeld; and a proof by the author. We explain the complex analysis behind each: a special case of Hadamard's factorisation theorem, a polynomial argument using the fundamental theorem of algebra, and the Pólya-Saxer theorem on zero-free entire functions and their derivatives. The elementary entire-function lemma needed for the first proof is proved in full; the Pólya-Saxer theorem is used without proof. We give full details of the algebraic argument common to the three proofs, which deduces multiplicativity from the preservation of squares, including the non-commutative case. We then discuss applications and counterexamples, and present an extension to Ransford's generalised spectra using the Roitman--Sternfeld argument. We conclude with a brief guide to the more recent literature.

Related

  1. A gentle introduction to approximating high-dimensional integrals with lattice rules and a maybe-not-so-gentle introduction to the relevant function spaces for QMC integration
    Dirk Nuyens
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Sparse Kahane--Salem--Zygmund Forms and Weighted Hardy--Littlewood Inequalities Across the Critical Endpoint
    Anderson Barbosa, Daniel Núñez-Alarcón, Anselmo Raposo +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. The Hochschild (co)homology of gentle algebras
    Cristian Chaparro, Sibylle Schroll, Andrea Solotar +1
    Journal of AlgebraPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text13 citedGeometry & topologyOpenAlex
  4. A proof of Kahane's conjecture in the Wiener algebra
    Przemysław Ohrysko
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Symmetric Kahane--Salem--Zygmund Inequalities and the Supremum Norm
    Daniel M. Pellegrino, Anselmo B. Raposo Jr., Eduardo V. Teixeira
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{badea2026gleasonkahanezelazko,
  title = {{The Gleason--Kahane--Zelazko theorem: a gentle introduction}},
  author = {Catalin Badea},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.39769},
  eprint = {2610.39769},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39769},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Gleason--Kahane--Zelazko theorem: a gentle introduction
AU  - Catalin Badea
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.39769
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39769
AB  - After some personal recollections of Jean-Pierre Kahane, this paper gives a gentle introduction to the Gleason-Kahane-Zelazko theorem. The theorem states that a normalised complex-linear functional on a unital complex Banach algebra is multiplicative whenever it does not vanish on invertible elements. Neither continuity of the functional nor commutativity of the algebra is assumed. We give a detailed account of three proofs: the original argument of Gleason and, independently, Kahane and Zelazko; the polynomial proof of Roitman and Sternfeld; and a proof by the author. We explain the complex analysis behind each: a special case of Hadamard's factorisation theorem, a polynomial argument using the fundamental theorem of algebra, and the Pólya-Saxer theorem on zero-free entire functions and their derivatives. The elementary entire-function lemma needed for the first proof is proved in full; the Pólya-Saxer theorem is used without proof. We give full details of the algebraic argument common to the three proofs, which deduces multiplicativity from the preservation of squares, including the non-commutative case. We then discuss applications and counterexamples, and present an extension to Ransford's generalised spectra using the Roitman--Sternfeld argument. We conclude with a brief guide to the more recent literature.
ER  -