Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Heart Failure Reviews

Ventriculo-arterial coupling in acute heart failure: prognostic and therapeutic insights - a systematic review and meta-analysis of multivariable-adjusted data

4 more authors

Abstract

In acute heart failure (AHF), non-invasive ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) surrogates, including right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) and left ventricular-arterial (LV-Ao) coupling, have emerged as practical bedside indices, but their prognostic significance remains largely unknown systematically. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of non-invasive VAC assessment, in patients hospitalized with AHF. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, length of hospital stay, use of therapies, the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and odds ratios (aORs) were pooled using random-effects. Subgroup-analyses were performed according to follow-up duration and left ventricular ejection fraction. Thirty-six studies comprising 36,989 patients were analysed. Twenty-eight studies evaluated RV-PA coupling, predominantly the TAPSE/PASP ratio, and eight evaluated LV-Ao coupling, mainly using non-invasive Ea/Ees estimates. RV-PA uncoupling was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.90; 95% CI 1.42–2.56; I²=49%), with consistent associations at 12 months (aHR 2.03; 95% CI 1.44–2.85) and long-term follow-up (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 1.06–2.64). Associations with HF hospitalization, hospital stay, and the composite endpoint were directionally consistent but not statistically significant. LV-Ao uncoupling was associated with increased in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events (aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.29–2.24). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of these findings. RV-PA uncoupling predicts mortality, whereas LV-Ao uncoupling identifies patients at increased risk of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events, supporting VAC-risk-stratification in AHF and future evaluation of VAC-guided therapeutic strategies.

Related

  1. Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Ventriculo‐Arterial Uncoupling in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Phenotype‐Specific Review of Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies
    Amarelle Chamoun, Talha Farooq, Suhayya Batool +11
    Clinical cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. A systematic review of prognostic multivariable risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes in prediabetic populations
    Wesam A. Ali, Maitha M. Al-Hajeri, Fatema A. M. Alkamali +2
    Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Endocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  3. Clinical relevance of ventriculo-arterial coupling and how to assess it at the bedside
    Fabio Guarracino, Paul Elbers, Michel Slama +1
    Annals of Intensive CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicineHAL
  4. Heterogeneous cardiovascular responses to acute mean arterial pressure augmentation in septic shock: the role of ventriculo-arterial coupling and venous return
    Emilio Daniel Valenzuela, Pablo Mercado, Juan Nicolás Medel +6
    Critical CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND1 citedGeneral biologyCardiovascular medicineHAL
  5. Dynamics of ventriculo-arterial coupling and peripheral tissue perfusion during early resuscitation of septic shock.
    Juan Daniel Caicedo Ruiz, Gustavo García Gallardo, Jose Luis Aldana +6
    Annals of intensive carePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{guz2026ventriculoarterial,
  title = {{Ventriculo-arterial coupling in acute heart failure: prognostic and therapeutic insights - a systematic review and meta-analysis of multivariable-adjusted data}},
  author = {Dragos Guz and Daniela Filipescu and Beth Davison and Elena-Laura Antohi and Andrew P Ambrosy and Serban Mihaileanu and Oliviana Geavlete and Sean P Collins and Razvan Radu and Marianna Adamo and Nicolas Girerd and Radu Filipescu and Luca Monzo and Jan Biegus and Gad Cotter and Ovidiu Chioncel},
  journal = {Heart Failure Reviews},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s10741-026-10680-w},
  url = {https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05789056v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ventriculo-arterial coupling in acute heart failure: prognostic and therapeutic insights - a systematic review and meta-analysis of multivariable-adjusted data
AU  - Dragos Guz
AU  - Daniela Filipescu
AU  - Beth Davison
AU  - Elena-Laura Antohi
AU  - Andrew P Ambrosy
AU  - Serban Mihaileanu
AU  - Oliviana Geavlete
AU  - Sean P Collins
AU  - Razvan Radu
AU  - Marianna Adamo
AU  - Nicolas Girerd
AU  - Radu Filipescu
AU  - Luca Monzo
AU  - Jan Biegus
AU  - Gad Cotter
AU  - Ovidiu Chioncel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Heart Failure Reviews
DO  - 10.1007/s10741-026-10680-w
UR  - https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05789056v1
AB  - In acute heart failure (AHF), non-invasive ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) surrogates, including right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) and left ventricular-arterial (LV-Ao) coupling, have emerged as practical bedside indices, but their prognostic significance remains largely unknown systematically. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of non-invasive VAC assessment, in patients hospitalized with AHF. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, length of hospital stay, use of therapies, the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and odds ratios (aORs) were pooled using random-effects. Subgroup-analyses were performed according to follow-up duration and left ventricular ejection fraction. Thirty-six studies comprising 36,989 patients were analysed. Twenty-eight studies evaluated RV-PA coupling, predominantly the TAPSE/PASP ratio, and eight evaluated LV-Ao coupling, mainly using non-invasive Ea/Ees estimates. RV-PA uncoupling was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.90; 95% CI 1.42–2.56; I²=49%), with consistent associations at 12 months (aHR 2.03; 95% CI 1.44–2.85) and long-term follow-up (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 1.06–2.64). Associations with HF hospitalization, hospital stay, and the composite endpoint were directionally consistent but not statistically significant. LV-Ao uncoupling was associated with increased in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events (aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.29–2.24). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of these findings. RV-PA uncoupling predicts mortality, whereas LV-Ao uncoupling identifies patients at increased risk of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events, supporting VAC-risk-stratification in AHF and future evaluation of VAC-guided therapeutic strategies.
SN  - 1382-4147
SN  - 1573-7322
ER  -